Osseointegration at Implants Installed in Composite Bone: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Sinus Floor Elevation
Source abstract
Abstract
Osseointegration of implants installed in conjunction with sinus floor elevation might be affected by the presence of residual graft. The implant surface characteristics and the protection of the access window using a collagen membrane might influence the osseointegration. To evaluate these factors, sinus floor elevation was performed in patients using a natural bovine bone grafting material. The access windows were either covered with a collagen membrane made of porcine corium (Mb group) or left uncovered (No-Mb group) and, after six months, two mini-implants with either a moderate rough or turned surfaces were installed. After 3 months, biopsies containing the mini-implants were retrieved, processed histologically, and analyzed. Twenty patients, ten in each group, were included in the study. The two mini-implants were retrieved from fourteen patients, six belonging to the Mb group, and eight to the No-Mb group. No statistically significant differences were found in osseointegration between groups. However, statistically significant differences were found between the two surfaces. It was concluded that implants with a moderately rough surface installed in a composite bone presented much higher osseointegration compared to those with a turned surface. The present study failed to show an effect of the use of a collagen membrane on the access window.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ARDEC Academy, 47923 Rimini, Italy
Department of Oral Biology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
ARDEC Foundation, Cartagena de Indias 130001, Colombia
Department of Medical Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
School of Dentistry, University Corporation Rafael Núñez, Cartagena de Indias 130001, Colombia
Funding
ARDEC Academy
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x ↗
2. Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed with cone-beam computed tomography: A randomized clinical trial10.1111/jicd.12362 ↗
3. Influence of the height of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed by cone beam computed tomography- a randomized clinical trial10.11607/jomi.7112 ↗
4. Histological outcomes on the development of new space-making devices for maxillary sinus floor augmentation10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00208.x ↗
5. Use of a titanium device in lateral sinus floor elevation: An experimental study in monkeys10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02200.x ↗
6. Bone regeneration using a hollow hydroxyapatite space-maintaining device for maxillary sinus floor augmentation—A clinical pilot study10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00293.x ↗
7. Omori, Y., Botticelli, D., Ferri, M., Delgado-Ruiz, R., Ferreira Balan, V., and Porfirio Xavier, S. (2021). Argon Bioactivation of Implants Installed Simultaneously to Maxillary Sinus Lifting without Graft. An Experimental Study in Rabbits. Dent. J., 9.10.3390/dj9090105 ↗
8. Outcomes of implants placed after osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts: A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-arm studies10.1186/s40729-021-00358-3 ↗
9. Sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: A systematic review of clinical data10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.6.411 ↗
10. Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: A radiographic study in minipigs10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02245.x ↗
11. Sinus augmentation analysis revised: The gradient of graft consolidation10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01733.x ↗
12. Lack of influence of the Schneiderian membrane in forming new bone apical to implants simultaneously installed with sinus floor elevation: An experimental study in monkeys10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02227.x ↗
13. Sinus mucosa elevation using Bio-Oss(®) or Gingistat(®) collagen sponge: An experimental study in rabbits10.1111/clr.12850 ↗
14. Influence of a collagen membrane positioned subjacent the sinus mucosa following the elevation of the maxillary sinus. A histomorphometric study in rabbits10.1111/clr.13027 ↗
15. Complications of postoperative swelling of the maxillary sinus membrane after sinus floor augmentation
16. Bone Graft Displacement after Maxillary Sinus Floor Aug-mentation With or Without Covering Barrier Membrane: A Retrospective Computed Tomographic Image Evaluation10.11607/jomi.6940 ↗
17. Effect of barrier membranes on the outcomes of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A meta-analysis of histomorphometric outcomes10.11607/jomi.3886 ↗
18. Histomorphometric analysis of bone healing at implants with turned or rough surfaces: An experimental study in the dog
19. Long-term clinical outcome of implants with different surface modifications
20. Influence of implant surface characteristics on the initiation, progression and treatment outcomes of peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal model studies
21. Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: A Systematic Review10.5037/jomr.2019.10101 ↗
22. What is the influence of implant surface characteristics and/or implant material on the incidence and progression of peri-implantitis? A systematic literature review10.1111/clr.13859 ↗
23. A retrospective study on the crestal bone loss as-sociated with different implant surfaces in chronic periodontitis patients under maintenance10.1111/clr.13153 ↗
24. One-year outcomes of dental implants with a hybrid surface macro-design placed in patients with history of periodontitis: A randomized clinical trial10.1111/jcpe.13575 ↗
25. Histomorphometric comparison of maxillary pristine bone and composite bone graft biopsies obtained after sinus augmentation10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01814.x ↗
26. The influence of a biomaterial on the closure of a marginal hard tissue defect adjacent to implants. An experimental study in the dog10.1046/j.1600-0501.2003.01008.x ↗
27. Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation on the healing of mini-implants: A randomized clinical trial10.1007/s10006-020-00846-7 ↗
28. Influence of the Dimensions of the Antrostomy on Osseointegration of Mini-implants Placed in the Grafted Region after Sinus Floor Elevation: A Randomized Clinical Trial10.11607/jomi.8005 ↗
29. Bone Healing at Implants Placed in Sites Prepared Either with a Sonic Device or Drills: A Split-Mouth Histomorphometric Randomized Controlled Trial10.11607/jomi.7481 ↗
30. Tomographic Assessment on the In-fluence of the Use of a Collagen Membrane on Dimensional Variations to Protect the Antrostomy After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical Trial10.11607/jomi.7843 ↗
31. Bone healing at bicortically installed implants with different surface configurations. An experimental study in rabbits10.1111/clr.12475 ↗
32. Use of sonic in-struments for implant biopsy retrieval10.1111/clr.12466 ↗
33. Correlated morphometric and biochemical analysis of gingival tissue. Mor-phometric model, tissue sampling and test of stereologic procedures10.1111/j.1365-2818.1973.tb04629.x ↗
34. Influence of material properties on rate of resorption of two bone graft materials after sinus lift using radiographic assessment10.1155/2012/737262 ↗
35. Histological evaluation of two different anorganic bovine bone matrixes in lateral wall sinus elevation procedure: A retrospective study10.4103/njms.NJMS_81_19 ↗
36. Comparison of Bone Formation After Sinus Membrane Lifting without Graft or Using Bone Substitute “Histologic and Radiographic Evaluation”10.1016/j.joms.2020.12.040 ↗
37. Sinus Floor Elevation Using the Lateral Approach and Window Repositioning and a Xenogeneic Bone Substitute as a Grafting Material: A Histologic, Histomorphometric, and Radio-graphic Analysis10.11607/jomi.6226 ↗
38. Purification processes of xenogeneic bone substitutes and their impact on tissue reactions and regeneration10.1177/0391398818771530 ↗
39. Injectable nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste for bone substitution: In vivo analysis of biocompatibility and vascularization10.1002/jbm.b.30755 ↗
40. Evaluation of a novel nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste and a solid hydroxyapatite ceramic for the treatment of critical size bone defects (CSD) in rabbits10.1007/s10856-007-3039-0 ↗
41. A Novel Xenograft Bone Substitute Supports Stable Bone Formation in Circumferential Defects around Dental Implants in Minipigs10.11607/jomi.8265 ↗
42. Resol based chi-tosan/nano-hydroxyapatite nanoensemble for effective bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.103 ↗
43. Bone-healing pattern at the surface of titanium implants: An experimental study in the dog10.1111/clr.12097 ↗
44. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00693.x ↗
45. Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: A study in dogs
46. Appositional bone formation in marginal defects at implants10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140101.x ↗
47. Bone healing pattern in surgically created cir-cumferential defects around submerged implants: An experimental study in dog10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02170.x ↗
48. The jumping distance revisited: An experimental study in the dog10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.x ↗
49. The effect of a fibrin glue on the integration of Bio-Oss with bone tissue. An experimental study in Labrador dogs10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290501.x ↗
50. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.x ↗
51. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x ↗
52. Sequential healing of open extraction sockets. An experimental study in monkeys10.1111/clr.12148 ↗
53. Histologic and Micro-CT Analyses at Implants Placed Immediately after Maxillary Sinus Elevation Using Large or Small Xenograft Granules: An Experimental Study in Rabbits10.11607/jomi.8067 ↗
54. Healing at implants installed con-currently to maxillary sinus floor elevation with Bio-Oss® or autologous bone grafts. A histo-morphometric study in rabbits10.1111/clr.12825 ↗
55. New bone ingrowth into β-TCP/HA graft activated with argon plasma: A histomorphometric study on sinus lifting in rabbits10.1186/s40729-020-00236-4 ↗
56. Bone plate repositioned over the antrostomy after sinus floor elevation: An experimental study in sheep10.1186/s40729-020-0207-1 ↗
57. IUPAC (1997). Compendium of Chemical Terminology, Blackwell Scientific Publications. [2nd ed.].
58. Histologic and clinical comparison of bilateral sinus floor elevations with and without barrier membrane placement in 12 patients: Part 3 of an ongoing prospective study
59. Sinus augmentation utilizing anor-ganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) with absorbable and nonabsorbable membranes placed over the lateral window: Histo-morphometric and clinical analyses
60. The effects of resorbable membrane on human maxillary sinus graft: A pilot study
61. Maxillary sinus augmentation using prehydrated corticocancellous porcine bone: Hystomorphometric evaluation after 6 months10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00274.x ↗
62. Sinus Floor Elevation and Antrostomy Healing: A Histomorphometric Clinical Study in Humans
63. Perini, A., Viña-Almunia, J., Carda, C., Martín de Llano, J.J., Botticelli, D., and Peñarrocha-Diago, M. (2021). Influence of the Use of a Collagen Membrane Placed on the Bone Window after Sinus Floor Augmentation-An Experimental Study in Rabbits. Dent. J., 9.10.3390/dj9110131 ↗
64. Prospective 3D Assessment of CORAGRAF and Bio-Oss as Bone Substitutes in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation for Implant Placement10.2485/jhtb.24.43 ↗
65. (2014). Yousaf Athar, Siti Lailatul Akmar Zainuddin, Zurairah Berahim, Akram Hassan, Aamina Sagheer, Mohammad Khursheed Alam Bovine Pericardium: A Highly Versatile Graft Material. Int. Med. J., 21, 321–324.
66. 3D CBCT Assessment of Incidental Maxillary Sinus Abnormalities in a Saudi Arabian Population10.2485/jhtb.26.369 ↗
67. Bovine Pericardium Membrane and Periodontal Guided Tissue Regeneration: A SEM Study