journal article·2023-04-30Open access

Robocasting of Ceramic Fischer–Koch S Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Vail Baumer, Erin Gunn, Valerie Riegle, Claire Bailey, Clayton Shonkwiler, David Prawel

Abstract

Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) are promising structures for bone tissue engineering scaffolds due to their relatively high mechanical energy absorption, smoothly interconnected porous structure, scalable unit cell topology, and relatively high surface area per volume. Calcium phosphate-based materials, such as hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate, are very popular scaffold biomaterials due to their biocompatibility, bioactivity, compositional similarities to bone mineral, non-immunogenicity, and tunable biodegradation. Their brittle nature can be partially mitigated by 3D printing them in TPMS topologies such as gyroids, which are widely studied for bone regeneration, as evidenced by their presence in popular 3D-printing slicers, modeling systems, and topology optimization tools. Although structural and flow simulations have predicted promising properties of other TPMS scaffolds, such as Fischer–Koch S (FKS), to the best of our knowledge, no one has explored these possibilities for bone regeneration in the laboratory. One reason for this is that fabrication of the FKS scaffolds, such as by 3D printing, is challenged by a lack of algorithms to model and slice this topology for use by low-cost biomaterial printers. This paper presents an open-source software algorithm that we developed to create 3D-printable FKS and gyroid scaffold cubes, with a framework that can accept any continuous differentiable implicit function. We also report on our successful 3D printing of hydroxyapatite FKS scaffolds using a low-cost method that combines robocasting with layer-wise photopolymerization. Dimensional accuracy, internal microstructure, and porosity characteristics are also presented, demonstrating promising potential for the 3D printing of TPMS ceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

Funding

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) · Colorado State University Translational Medicine Institute Translational Acceleration Program (TMI TAP) · Simons Foundation

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Dynamic Bioreactor Culture of High Volume Engineered Bone Tissue10.1089/ten.tea.2015.0395 ↗
2. Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–202510.1359/jbmr.061113 ↗
3. The Direct and Indirect Costs of Long Bone Fractures in a Working Age US Population10.3111/13696998.2012.737391 ↗
4. Trends in Fracture Incidence: A Population-Based Study Over 20 Years10.1002/jbmr.2072 ↗
5. Soft Tissue Reconstruction after Compound Tibial Fracture: 235 Cases over 12 Years10.1016/j.bjps.2015.05.017 ↗
6. Use of a Vascularized Fibula Bone Flap and Intercalary Allograft for Diaphyseal Reconstruction after Resection of Primary Extremity Bone Sarcomas10.1097/01.prs.0000189203.38204.d5 ↗
7. Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects: Current Clinical Therapeutic Strategies and Future Directions Using 3D Printing10.3389/fbioe.2020.00061 ↗
8. The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature-A Systematic Review10.1155/2017/8074178 ↗
9. Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterials10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.08.003 ↗
10. Evaluation of 3D Printing and Its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences10.1021/ac403397r ↗
11. Microwave-Sintered 3D Printed Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering10.1002/term.555 ↗
12. Crosslinked, Electrospun Chitosan–Poly (Ethylene Oxide) Nanofiber Mats10.1002/app.28107 ↗
13. Porous Scaffold Design for Tissue Engineering10.1038/nmat1421 ↗
14. Bone Tissue Engineering Using 3D Printing10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
15. Lin, K., Sheikh, R., Romanazzo, S., and Roohani, I. (2019). 3D Printing of Bioceramic Scaffolds—Barriers to the Clinical Translation: From Promise to Reality, and Future Perspectives. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12172660 ↗
16. Zafar, M.J., Zhu, D., and Zhang, Z. (2019). 3D Printing of Bioceramics for Bone Tissue Engineering. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12203361 ↗
17. 3D Printing of Ceramic Biomaterials
18. Fundamentals of Biomechanics in Tissue Engineering of Bone10.1089/107632700418083 ↗
19. Porosity of 3D Biomaterial Scaffolds and Osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
20. Diffusion in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering Scaffolds- Design Issues Related to Porosity, Permeability, Architecture, and Nutrient Mixing10.1007/s10439-004-7825-2 ↗
21. Permeability Analysis of Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.019 ↗
22. SrO- and MgO-doped Microwave Sintered 3D Printed Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds: Mechanical Properties and in Vivo Osteogenesis in a Rabbit Model10.1002/jbm.b.33239 ↗
23. Pore Size and Pore Volume Effects on Alumina and TCP Ceramic Scaffolds10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00129-7 ↗
24. Biomimetic Porous Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001 ↗
25. On Stiffness of Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering—A Numerical Study10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.020 ↗
26. 3D Photo-Fabrication for Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery10.15302/J-ENG-2015015 ↗
27. New Clinical Application of Three-Dimensional-Printed Polycaprolactone/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffold as an Alternative to Allograft Bone for Limb-Sparing Surgery in a Dog with Distal Radial Osteosarcoma10.1292/jvms.18-0158 ↗
28. Use of Three-dimensionally Printed Β-tricalcium Phosphate Synthetic Bone Graft Combined with Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 to Treat a Severe Radial Atrophic Nonunion in a Yorkshire Terrier10.1111/vsu.13476 ↗
29. Scaffold-Guided Bone Regeneration in Large Volume Tibial Segmental Defects10.1016/j.bone.2021.116163 ↗
30. Osteoinductive 3D Printed Scaffold Healed 5 Cm Segmental Bone Defects in the Ovine Metatarsus10.1038/s41598-021-86210-5 ↗
31. Additive Manufacturing Technology for Porous Metal Implant Applications and Triple Minimal Surface Structures: A Review10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.003 ↗
32. Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polymeric Gyroid Cellular Structures: Experimental and Finite Element Study10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107597 ↗
33. Germain, L., Fuentes, C.A., van Vuure, A.W., des Rieux, A., and Dupont-Gillain, C. (2018). 3D-Printed Biodegradable Gyroid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Mater. Des., 10.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.037 ↗
34. In Vitro Assessment of Laser Sintered Bioactive Glass Scaffolds with Different Pore Geometries10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0175 ↗
35. Minimal Surface Scaffold Designs for Tissue Engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.012 ↗
36. High Strength Porous PLA Gyroid Scaffolds Manufactured via Fused Deposition Modeling for Tissue-Engineering Applications10.1016/j.smaim.2020.10.003 ↗
37. The Journey of Multifunctional Bone Scaffolds Fabricated from Traditional toward Modern Techniques10.1007/s42242-020-00094-4 ↗
38. An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Compressive Response of Designed Schwarz Primitive Triply Periodic Minimal Surface with Non-Uniform Shell Thickness10.1016/j.eml.2020.100671 ↗
39. Lu, Y., Cheng, L., Yang, Z., Li, J., and Zhu, H. (2020). Relationship between the Morphological, Mechanical and Permeability Properties of Porous Bone Scaffolds and the Underlying Microstructure. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0238471 ↗
40. Mechanical Behaviours and Mass Transport Properties of Bone-Mimicking Scaffolds Consisted of Gyroid Structures Manufactured Using Selective Laser Melting10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.023 ↗
41. Insights into the Mechanical Properties of Several Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Lattice Structures Made by Polymer Additive Manufacturing10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.049 ↗
42. Numerical Optimization of Open-Porous Bone Scaffold Structures to Match the Elastic Properties of Human Cortical Bone10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.002 ↗
43. Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) Porous Structures: From Multi-Scale Design, Precise Additive Manufacturing to Multidisciplinary Applications10.1088/2631-7990/ac5be6 ↗
44. Additive Manufacturing of Tissues and Organs10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007 ↗
45. Mechanical Response of 3D Printed Bending-Dominated Ligament-Based Triply Periodic Cellular Polymeric Solids10.1007/s11665-019-03982-8 ↗
46. Compressive Failure Modes and Energy Absorption in Additively Manufactured Double Gyroid Lattices
47. Micromechanical Behavior of TPMS Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering10.1002/mame.202000487 ↗
48. Effects of the Architecture of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds on Cell Seeding and Culturing10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.012 ↗
49. On the Permeability of TPMS Scaffolds10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103932 ↗
50. Porous Polylactic Acid Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration: A Study of Additively Manufactured Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces and Their Osteogenic Potential10.1177/2041731420956541 ↗
51. The Compressive Behaviour of ABS Gyroid Lattice Structures Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modelling10.1007/s00170-020-05239-4 ↗
52. RegionTPMS—Region Based Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) for 3-D Printed Multiphase Bone Scaffolds with Exact Porosity Values10.1016/j.softx.2021.100835 ↗
53. Synthesis, Processing, Mechanical, and Biological Property Characterization of Hydroxyapatite Whisker-Reinforced Hydroxyapatite Composites10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02881.x ↗
54. Mechanical Properties of Ceramic Structures Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) Processed by 3D Printing10.1088/1742-6596/935/1/012036 ↗
55. Extrusion-Based 3D Printing of Ceramic Components10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.028 ↗
56. A New Photopolymer Extrusion 5-Axis 3D Printer
57. Processing Parameters Investigation for the Fabrication of Self-Supported and Freeform Polymeric Microstructures Using Ultraviolet-Assisted Three-Dimensional Printing10.1088/0960-1317/24/5/055020 ↗
58. (2019). 58. Lopez Ambrosio, Katherine V. Hydroxyapatite Structures Created by Additive Manufacturing with Extruded Photopolymer. [Master’s Thesis, Colorado State University].
59. Isaacson, N., Lopez-Ambrosio, K., Chubb, L., Waanders, N., Hoffmann, E., Witt, C., James, S., and Prawel, D.A. (2022). Compressive Properties and Failure Behavior of Photocast Hydroxyapatite Gyroid Scaffolds Vary with Porosity. J. Biomater. Appl.10.1177/08853282211073904 ↗
60. The Anisotropic Elastic Behavior of the Widely-Used Triply-Periodic Minimal Surface Based Scaffolds10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.012 ↗
61. Geier, M., and Alihussein, H. (2021). Computation of Implicit Representation of Volumetric Shells with Predefined Thickness. Algorithms, 14.10.3390/a14040125 ↗
62. Gunn, E. (2023, January 02). Non-Manifold Meshes for Gyroid and Fisher-Koch S Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces. Available online: https://github.com/IkonOne/tpmsModeller.
63. Musy, M., Jacquenot, G., Dalmasso, G., de Bruin, R., Müller, J., Pollack, A., Claudi, F., Badger, C., and Sol, A. (2022, October 18). Vedo, a Python Module for Scientific Analysis and Visualization of 3D Objects and Point Clouds. Available online: https://zenodo.org/record/7222019#.Y1GySnbMLD4.
64. Image Processing with ImageJ
65. A Review of Melt Extrusion Additive Manufacturing Processes: I. Process Design and Modeling10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012 ↗
66. Porous Scaffold Internal Architecture Design Based on Minimal Surfaces: A Compromise between Permeability and Elastic Properties10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.009 ↗