Influence of Cyclic Loading on the Removal Torque of Unique Subperiosteal Implant Screws
Source abstract
Abstract
During the investigation, the effect of screw tightening torque on the potential loosening of screws under load was examined in the case of custom-made subperiosteal implants. The study focused on the connection screws between the implant components, testing the commonly applied tightening torques of 15 Ncm and 30 Ncm. Mastication was simulated using a custom-designed, PLC-controlled testing device, which allowed for the reproduction of variable numbers, forces, and speeds of bite cycles. With this device, six different scenarios were tested, including 500, 2000, and 10,000 bite cycles, under both constant and variable bite forces. A caliper was used to record potential length changes of the screws, force sensors measured the bite forces, and calibrated torque screwdrivers were used to verify the loosening torques. Based on the analysis of the measured data, it was concluded that for the M1.8 screws tested, a tightening torque of 15 Ncm does not provide sufficient resistance against loosening, whereas 30 Ncm offers adequate stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Technology, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary
Alba Regia Technical Faculty, Óbuda University, 8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary
PaB Kereskedelmi és Fejlesztő Kft., 1116 Budapest, Hungary
Funding
Ministry of Culture and Innovation and the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund through the University Research Fellowship Program (EKÖP-KDP) · Széchenyi István University
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Morse taper connection implants supporting “planned” maxillary and mandibular bar-retained overdentures: A 5-year prospective multicenter study10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02079.x ↗
2. Small-diameter titanium grade IV and titanium-zirconium implants in edentulous mandibles: Five-year results from a double-blind, randomized controlled trial10.1186/s12903-015-0107-6 ↗
3. Fixed restorations supported by Morse-taper connection implants: A retrospective clinical study with 10–20 years of follow-up10.1111/clr.12439 ↗
4. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Prostheses for the edentulous mandible (Protocol)
5. Haugen, H.J., and Chen, H. (2022). Is There a Better Biomaterial for Dental Implants than Titanium?—A Review and Meta-Study Analysis. J. Funct. Biomater., 13.10.3390/jfb13020046 ↗
6. Contemporary Concepts in Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Review10.1155/2022/6170452 ↗
7. Technical complications of implant-causes and management: A comprehensive review10.4103/0975-5950.168233 ↗
8. Velasco-Ortega, E., Flichy-Fernández, A., Punset, M., Jiménez-Guerra, A., Manero, J.M., and Gil, J. (2019). Fracture and Fatigue of Titanium Narrow Dental Implants: New Trends in Order to Improve the Mechanical Response. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12223728 ↗
9. Implant screw mechanics10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00606-1 ↗
10. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00096.x ↗
11. Implants and components: Entering the new millennium
12. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs)10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x ↗
13. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x ↗
14. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws
15. Körtvélyessy, G., Szabó, Á.L., Pelsőczi-Kovács, I., Tarjányi, T., Tóth, Z., Kárpáti, K., Matusovits, D., Hangyási, B.D., and Baráth, Z. (2023). Different Conical Angle Connection of Implant and Abutment Behavior: A Static and Dynamic Load Test and Finite Element Analysis Study. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16051988 ↗
16. Rico-Coderch, A., Félix, L.F., Solá-Ruiz, M.F., Medina, M., Agustín-Panadero, R., Ortega, R., Cascos, R., and Gómez-Polo, M. (2024). Influence of CAD/CAM Manufacturing Technique and Implant Abutment Angulation on Loosening of Individual Screw-Retained Implant Crowns. Metals, 14.10.3390/met14070816 ↗
17. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: A systematic review10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01271.x ↗
18. Om möjligheten för implantation i käken av metallskelett som bas eller retention för fasta eller avtagbara proteser
19. A 41-year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant
20. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions10.1111/prd.12185 ↗
21. Tripodal mandibular subperiosteal implant: Basic sciences, operational procedures, and clinical data10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0016:TMSIBS>2.3.CO;2 ↗
22. Ramus hinges for excessive movements of the condyles: A new dimension in mandibular tripodal subperiosteal implants10.1563/1548-1336(1999)025<0011:RHFEMO>2.3.CO;2 ↗
23. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface10.1177/154405910608500515 ↗
24. Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of premachined or cast components10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.026 ↗
25. Torque removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening cycles: An in vitro study10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02165.x ↗
26. Effect of retorque on loosening torque of prosthetic screws under two levels of fit of implant-supported dentures10.1590/S0103-64402010000100002 ↗
27. De Riu, G., Soma, D., Biglio, A., Raho, M.T., Mura, D., Michelon, F., Salzano, G., Piombino, P., Lechien, J.R., and Vaira, L.A. (2023). Primary reconstruction of total maxillectomy with custom-made subperiosteal implant and temporal muscle flap: A case report. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13106269 ↗
28. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability
29. Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses
30. Effect of lateral cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of an external hexagon implant system10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.001 ↗
31. Mechanical Studies of Subperiosteal Implants10.3311/PPme.23706 ↗
32. 3D printed bone models in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: A systematic review10.1186/s41205-020-00082-5 ↗
33. (2025, June 20). Formlabs.com. Available online: https://formlabs-media.formlabs.com/datasheets/2001340-TDS-ENUS-0P.pdf.
34. (2025, June 20). s3.amazonaws.com. Available online: https://s3.amazonaws.com/servicecloudassets.formlabs.com/media/Finishing/Post-Curing/115001414464-Form%20Cure%20Time%20and%20Temperature%20Settings/FormCurePost-CureSettings.pdf.