Development of Bioceramic Bone-Inspired Scaffolds Through Single-Step Melt-Extrusion 3D Printing for Segmental Defect Treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
The increasing demand for novel tissue engineering (TE) applications in bone tissue regeneration underscores the importance of exploring advanced manufacturing techniques and biomaterials for personalised treatment approaches. Three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology facilitates the development of implantable devices with intricate geometries, enabling patient-specific therapeutic solutions. Although Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) and Direct Ink Writing (DIW) are widely utilised for fabricating bone-like implants, the need for multiple processing steps often prolongs the overall production time. In this study, a single-step melt-extrusion 3DP technique was performed to develop multi-material scaffolds including bioceramics, hydroxyapatite (HA), and β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) in both their bioactive and calcined forms at 10% and 20% w/w, within polycaprolactone (PCL) matrices. Printing parameters were optimised, and physicochemical properties of all biomaterials and final forms were evaluated. Thermal degradation and surface morphology analyses assessed the consistency and distribution of the ceramics across the different formulations. The tensile testing of the scaffolds defined the impact of each ceramic type and wt% on scaffold flexibility performance, while in vitro cell studies determined the cytocompatibility efficiency. Hence, all 3D-printed PCL–ceramic composite scaffolds achieved structural integrity and physicochemical and thermal stability. The mechanical profile of extruded samples was relevant to the ceramic consistency, providing valuable insights for further mechanotransduction investigations. Notably, all materials showed high cell viability and proliferation, indicating strong biocompatibility. Therefore, this additive manufacturing (AM) process is a precise and fast approach for developing biomaterial-based scaffolds, with potential applications in surgical restoration and support of segmental bone defects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Oral Solids Development, Research & Development, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
Funding
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · NIH
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Lou, Y., Wang, H., Ye, G., Li, Y., Liu, C., Yu, M., and Ying, B. (2021). Periosteal Tissue Engineering: Current Developments and Perspectives. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 10.10.1002/adhm.202100215 ↗
2. Buer Boyetey, M.J., Torgbo, S., and Sukyai, P. (2023). Bio-Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering with Focus on Bacterial Cellulose, Biological Materials for Hydroxyapatite Synthesis and Growth Factors. Eur. Polym. J., 194.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112168 ↗
3. Development and Characterisation of Bilayered Periosteum-Inspired Composite Membranes Based on Sodium Alginate-Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles10.1016/j.jcis.2020.03.086 ↗
4. Anisotropy Characteristics of Microstructures for Bone Substitutes and Porous Implants with Application of Additive Manufacturing in Orthopaedic10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108608 ↗
5. Wang, W., Wang, L., Zhang, B., Shang, S., Zhao, C., Zhang, W., Chen, J., Zhou, C., Zhou, H., and Feng, S. (2024). 3D Printing of Personalized Magnesium Composite Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold for Bone and Angiogenesis Regeneration. Chem. Eng. J., 484.10.1016/j.cej.2024.149444 ↗
6. Herath, B., Suresh, S., Downing, D., Cometta, S., Tino, R., Castro, N.J., Leary, M., Schmutz, B., Wille, M.L., and Hutmacher, D.W. (2021). Mechanical and Geometrical Study of 3D Printed Voronoi Scaffold Design for Large Bone Defects. Mater. Des., 212.10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110224 ↗
7. Abdollahiyan, P., Oroojalian, F., Mokhtarzadeh, A., and de la Guardia, M. (2020). Hydrogel-Based 3D Bioprinting for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Biotechnol. J., 15.10.1002/biot.202000095 ↗
8. MicroRNA-Activated Hydrogel Scaffold Generated by 3D Printing Accelerates Bone Regeneration
9. Osteogenic Magnesium Incorporated into PLGA/TCP Porous Scaffold by 3D Printing for Repairing Challenging Bone Defect10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.013 ↗
10. Vascularized 3D Printed Scaffolds for Promoting Bone Regeneration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.033 ↗
11. dos Santos, V.I., Chevalier, J., Fredel, M.C., Henriques, B., and Gremillard, L. (2024). Ceramics and Ceramic Composites for Biomedical Engineering Applications via Direct Ink Writing: Overall Scenario, Advances in the Improvement of Mechanical and Biological Properties and Innovations. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep., 161.10.1016/j.mser.2024.100841 ↗
12. Three Dimensionally Printed Bioactive Ceramic Scaffold Osseoconduction across Critical-Sized Mandibular Defects10.1016/j.jss.2017.10.027 ↗
13. Robocasting of Silicon Nitride with Controllable Shape and Architecture for Biomedical Applications10.1111/ijac.12633 ↗
14. Chan, S.S.L., Black, J.R., Franks, G.V., and Heath, D.E. (2025). Hierarchically Porous 3D-Printed Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Biomater. Adv., 169.10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214149 ↗
15. Dedeloudi, A., Farzeen, F., Lesutan, V.N., Irwin, R., Wylie, M.P., Andersen, S., Eastwood, M.P., and Lamprou, D.A. (2025). Biopolymeric 3D Printed Scaffolds as a Versatile Tissue Engineering Treatment for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Int. J. Pharm., 672.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125313 ↗
16. Dedeloudi, A., Martinez-Marcos, L., Quinten, T., Andersen, S.K., and Lamprou, D.A. (2025). 3D-Printed Biomaterial-Based Scaffolds Loaded with Zoledronic Acid Functionalised Ceramic Microparticles for Sustained Release. Int. J. Pharm., 683.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126101 ↗
17. Wu, L., Pei, X., Zhang, B., Su, Z., Gui, X., Gao, C., Guo, L., Fan, H., Jiang, Q., and Zhao, L. (2023). 3D-Printed HAp Bone Regeneration Scaffolds Enable Nano-Scale Manipulation of Cellular Mechanotransduction Signals. Chem. Eng. J., 455.10.1016/j.cej.2022.140699 ↗
18. Gui, X., Song, P., Zhang, B., Lei, H., Wu, L., Sun, J., Tang, R., Zhang, H., Qin, Y., and Su, Z. (2025). Natural Loofah Sponge Inspired 3D Printed Bionic Scaffolds Promote Personalized Bone Defect Regeneration. Compos. B Eng., 288.10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111920 ↗
19. Biomimetic Mineralized 3D-Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffold Induced by Self-Adaptive Nanotopology to Accelerate Bone Regeneration10.1021/acsami.4c02636 ↗
20. Fitzpatrick, V., Martín-Moldes, Z., Deck, A., Torres-Sanchez, R., Valat, A., Cairns, D., Li, C., and Kaplan, D.L. (2021). Functionalized 3D-Printed Silk-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Enhanced Bone Regeneration with Innervation and Vascularization. Biomaterials, 276.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120995 ↗
21. The Sustainability of Emerging Technologies for Use in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing10.1080/17425247.2022.2093857 ↗
22. Ebrahimi, Z., Irani, S., Ardeshirylajimi, A., and Seyedjafari, E. (2022). Enhanced Osteogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells by 3D Printed PCL Scaffolds Coated with Collagen and Hydroxyapatite. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-15602-y ↗
23. Fabrication of Chitosan/Alginate/Hydroxyapatite Hybrid Scaffolds Using 3D Printing and Impregnating Techniques for Potential Cartilage Regeneration10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.201 ↗
24. Lee, J., Song, C., Noh, I., Song, S., and Rhee, Y.S. (2020). Hot-Melt 3d Extrusion for the Fabrication of Customizable Modified-Release Solid Dosage Forms. Pharmaceutics, 12.10.3390/pharmaceutics12080738 ↗
25. 3D-Printed Tri-Element-Doped Hydroxyapatite/Polycaprolactone Composite Scaffolds with Antibacterial Potential for Osteosarcoma Therapy and Bone Regeneration
26. Babilotte, J., Martin, B., Guduric, V., Bareille, R., Agniel, R., Roques, S., Héroguez, V., Dussauze, M., Gaudon, M., and Le Nihouannen, D. (2021). Development and Characterization of a PLGA-HA Composite Material to Fabricate 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 118.10.1016/j.msec.2020.111334 ↗
27. 3D-Printed Mg-Incorporated PCL-Based Scaffolds: A Promising Approach for Bone Healing10.1016/j.msec.2021.112372 ↗
28. 3D-Printed PCL Scaffolds Coated with Nanobioceramics Enhance Osteogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells10.1021/acsomega.1c04015 ↗
29. Effect of Mechanical Loading on Bone Regeneration in HA/β-TCP/SF Scaffolds Prepared by Low-Temperature 3D Printing In Vivo10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00437 ↗
30. Biopolymeric 3D Printed Implantable Scaffolds as a Potential Adjuvant Treatment for Acute Post-Operative Pain Management10.1080/17425247.2024.2336492 ↗
31. Oladeji, S., Mohylyuk, V., Jones, D.S., and Andrews, G.P. (2022). 3D Printing of Pharmaceutical Oral Solid Dosage Forms by Fused Deposition: The Enhancement of Printability Using Plasticised HPMCAS. Int. J. Pharm., 616.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121553 ↗
32. Corduas, F., Mathew, E., McGlynn, R., Mariotti, D., Lamprou, D.A., and Mancuso, E. (2021). Melt-Extrusion 3D Printing of Resorbable Levofloxacin-Loaded Meshes: Emerging Strategy for Urogynaecological Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 131.10.1016/j.msec.2021.112523 ↗
33. Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 ↗
34. Backes, E.H., Fernandes, E.M., Diogo, G.S., Marques, C.F., Silva, T.H., Costa, L.C., Passador, F.R., Reis, R.L., and Pessan, L.A. (2021). Engineering 3D Printed Bioactive Composite Scaffolds Based on the Combination of Aliphatic Polyester and Calcium Phosphates for Bone Tissue Regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 122.10.1016/j.msec.2021.111928 ↗
35. Calcining Influence on the Powder Properties of Hydroxyapatite10.1023/A:1008986430940 ↗
36. Synthesis and Sintered Properties Evaluation of Calcium Phosphate Ceramics10.1016/j.msec.2006.06.021 ↗
37. The Effects of Sintering Temperature on the Properties of Hydroxyapatite10.1016/S0272-8842(99)00046-2 ↗
38. Pitol-Palin, L., Moura, J., Frigério, P.B., de Souza Batista, F.R., Saska, S., Oliveira, L.J.M., Matsubara, E.Y., Pilatti, L., Câmara, D., and Lizier, N. (2024). A Preliminary Study of Cell-Based Bone Tissue Engineering into 3D-Printed β-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds and Polydioxanone Membranes. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-82334-6 ↗
39. Cestari, F., Petretta, M., Yang, Y., Motta, A., Grigolo, B., and Sglavo, V.M. (2021). 3D Printing of PCL/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Derived from Biogenic Sources for Bone Tissue Engineering. Sustain. Mater. Technol., 29.10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00318 ↗
40. Evaluation of a Multiscale Modelling Methodology to Predict the Mechanical Properties of PCL/β-TCP Sintered Scaffold Materials10.1007/s10439-014-1199-x ↗
41. Meng, D., Hou, Y., Zubairi, H., Ucan, M.T., Hall, D.A., Feteira, A., Bartolo, P., Wang, G., and Wang, W. (2025). Ceramic-Based Piezoelectric Material Reinforced 3D Printed Polycaprolactone Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Mater. Des., 257.10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114542 ↗
42. Nanocomposite Films of Polycaprolactone and Amorphous/Sintered Wollastonite Nanoparticles for Potential Biomedical Applications10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.04.417 ↗
43. Mechanical Properties of the Periosteum in the Pig, Sus Scrofa10.1016/S0003-9969(02)00065-1 ↗
44. Gonçalves, A.M., Leal, F., Moreira, A., Schellhorn, T., Blahnová, V.H., Zeiringer, S., Vocetková, K., Tetyczka, C., Simaite, A., and Buzgo, M. (2023). Potential of Electrospun Fibrous Scaffolds for Intestinal, Skin, and Lung Epithelial Tissue Modeling. Adv. Nanobiomed Res., 3.10.1002/anbr.202200104 ↗
45. Tuning the Properties of Hydroxyapatite through Mg/Zn Co-Doping: A Pathway to Advanced Biomedical Devices10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00440 ↗
46. Fibroblasts and Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells Are Phenotypically Indistinguishable10.1159/000445096 ↗