journal article·2026-06-01Open access

Fluoride Modified Graded Restoratives Based on Induced Silica Mineralization

Ahmed K. Al-Kamal, Israa Z. Ahmed, Esraa A. Abbod, Kadhim K. Resan, Mohammed Ali Abdulrehman, Ali M. Flayyih

Abstract

Most existing dental restorative materials exhibit limited bioactivity, insufficient acid resistance, and poor mechanical compatibility with natural tooth structures. This study involved an in vitro approach in which a biomimetic fluoride-modified functionally gradient dental restorative material was prepared from sol–gel-derived mesoporous silica through mineralization induced via SBF solution. They synthesized bioactive restorative materials by introducing silica into a simulated body fluid (SBF) for biomimetic mineralization and generating hydroxyapatite on the silica surface. XRD, FTIR, SEM, and EDS analyses confirmed the presence of hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite-like phases. The results showed statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) in the mechanical properties. The surface hardness of the developed restorative system ranged from 214 HV for the prepared silica to 392 HV for the fluoride-modified specimens. Biomimetic mineralization and fluoride modification increased the shear bond strength to dentin substrates from 9.2 MPa to 21.4 MPa and the wear from 12.8 mg to 3.6 mg, respectively. Acid resistance evaluation also showed that the specimens with fluoride modification had the highest value of hardness retention (92.1%) after acid resistance due to the formation of chemically stable and dense apatite-rich layers on the surface. The functionally graded structure demonstrated a partial biomimetic resemblance to certain hierarchical and functional characteristics of natural dental tissues under in vitro conditions. In vitro studies on bioactivity, mechanical properties, and resistance to acidic environments of the synthesized restorative showed promising results for future dental restoration applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Fluoride Effects and Removal

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Engineering Department, Engineering College, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad 10045, Iraq

Mechanical Engineering Department, Engineering College, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad 10045, Iraq

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Bioactive restorative materials: The intersection of restoration and regeneration
2. Dental materials: A comprehensive review of evolution, classification, challenges and future prospects10.31782/IJCRR.2023.152403 ↗
3. Hameed, R.M. (2023). Bioactive Materials Used in Pediatric Dentistry. [Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Baghdad]. Available online: https://codental.uobaghdad.edu.iq/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2023/12/Rania-Majeed.pdf.
4. Zafar, M.S., Amin, F., Fareed, M.A., Ghabbani, H., Riaz, S., Khurshid, Z., and Kumar, N. (2020). Biomimetic aspects of restorative dentistry biomaterials. Biomimetics, 5.10.3390/biomimetics5030034 ↗
5. Perez-Moreno, A., Reyes-Peces, M.d.l.V., de los Santos, D.M., Pinaglia-Tobaruela, G., de la Orden, E., Vilches-Pérez, J.I., Salido, M., Piñero, M., and de la Rosa-Fox, N. (2020). Hydroxyl Groups Induce Bioactivity in Silica/Chitosan Aerogels Designed for Bone Tissue Engineering. In Vitro Model for the Assessment of Osteoblasts Behavior. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12122802 ↗
6. A comprehensive review of wear in restorative dentistry: From enamel to advanced restorative materials10.24874/ti.1994.07.25.08 ↗
7. A critical review of dental biomaterials with an emphasis on biocompatibility10.17219/dmp/172732 ↗
8. Evolution of biomimetic approaches for regenerative and restorative dentistry
9. Lile, I.E., Cojocariu, C., Pasca, C., Stăncioiu, A.-A., Vaida, L.L., and Marian, D. (2026). Flexural Strength of Different Restorative Materials Used for Direct Restoration in Pediatric Dentistry: An In Vitro Study. Biomimetics, 11.10.3390/biomimetics11010016 ↗
10. Materials in restorative dentistry10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb20274.x ↗
11. pH change of different dental adhesives 30 and 60 days after polymerization10.59306/jrd.v12e3202412-16 ↗
12. Satou, R., and Sugihara, N. (2024). In vitro risk assessment of dental acid erosion caused by long-term exposure to oral liquid bandages. Dent. J., 12.10.3390/dj12030070 ↗
13. Evaluation of longevity and performance of various dental filling materials
14. Buzatu, B.L.R., Buzatu, R., Galuscan, A., Luca, D.A., Rosianu, R.S., Balean, O., Vlase, T., and Jumanca, D. (2024). Assessing the impact of acidic drinks on the structural integrity of enamel and their consequences for dental aesthetics. Rom. J. Oral Rehabil., 16.10.62610/RJOR.2024.4.16.5 ↗
15. Effect of oral environment on contemporary orthodontic materials and its clinical implications10.4103/jos.jos_73_22 ↗
16. Saha, S., and Roy, S. (2023). Metallic dental implants wear mechanisms, materials, and manufacturing processes: A literature review. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16010161 ↗
17. Dorozhkin, S.V. (2022). Calcium orthophosphate (CaPO4)-based bioceramics: Preparation, properties, and applications. Coatings, 12.10.3390/coatings12101380 ↗
18. Present status and future directions—Vital pulp treatment and pulp preservation strategies10.1111/iej.13688 ↗
19. Three interfaces of the dental implant system and their clinical effects on hard and soft tissues10.1039/D1MH01621K ↗
20. The role of biomaterials and biocompatible materials in implant-supported dental prosthesis
21. (2022). Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials (Standard No. ASTM E384–22).
22. (2023). Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on-Disk Apparatus (Standard No. ASTM G99–17).
23. (2013). Dentistry—Adhesion—Notched-Edge Shear Bond Strength Test (Standard No. ISO 29022:2013).