A Comparative Investigation of Chemical Decontamination Methods for In-Situ Cleaning of Dental Implant Surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Surface chemistry evaluation is crucial in assessing the efficacy of chemical decontamination products for titanium implants. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of chemical decontamination solutions in cleaning a contaminated dental implant surface and to evaluate the potential of combining Pluronic gel with hydrogen peroxide (NuBone®Clean) by evaluating pellicle disruption and re-formation on implant surfaces. In addition, ensuring safety with in vitro and human testing protocols. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was utilised for surface analysis. All the tested gels had some effect on the surface cleanness except for PrefGel®. Among the tested chemical decontamination candidates, NuBone®Clean demonstrated effectiveness in providing a cleaner titanium surface. Furthermore, none of the tested chemical agents exhibited cytotoxic effects, and the safety assessment showed no adverse events. The results of this study highlight the significance of conducting comprehensive evaluations, encompassing safety and efficacy, before introducing new chemical agents for dental treatments. The findings suggest that NuBone®Clean shows potential as a chemical decontamination solution for implant surfaces. However, further investigation through randomised clinical trials is necessary. By adhering to rigorous testing protocols, the development of safe and efficient chemical decontamination strategies can be advanced, benefiting patients and promoting progress in implant dentistry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway
Department of Prosthetics and Oral Function, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway
Section of the Postgraduate Program in Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
Funding
“MISFAITH” · “DEBRIGEL” · Horizon Europe “BIOMATDB”
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.044 ↗
2. Grundy, E.M., and Murphy, M. (2017). Oxford Textbook of Geriatric Medicine, Oxford University Press.
3. Surgical site infections: Epidemiology, microbiology and prevention10.1016/S0195-6701(08)60017-1 ↗
4. Biofilms and device-associated infections10.3201/eid0702.010226 ↗
5. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1 ↗
6. Guided growth for pathological physes: Radiographic improvement during realignment10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181841fda ↗
7. Management of peri-implantitis10.4103/1735-3327.104867 ↗
8. Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: Systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.011 ↗
9. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions10.1002/JPER.17-0739 ↗
10. Peri-implantitis update: Risk indicators, diagnosis, and treatment10.1055/s-0040-1715779 ↗
11. Acquired salivary pellicle and oral diseases: A literature review10.1016/j.jds.2020.10.007 ↗
12. Investigation of initial pellicle formation on modified titanium dioxide (TiO2) surfaces by reflectometric interference spectroscopy (RIfS) in a model system10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.010 ↗
13. Bioadhesion in the oral cavity and approaches for biofilm management by surface modifications10.1007/s00784-020-03646-1 ↗
14. Peri-Implant Health and the Knowing-Doing Gap—A Digital Survey on Procedures and Therapies10.3389/fdmed.2021.726607 ↗
15. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions10.1111/prd.12185 ↗
16. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of titanium surface on nanostructural and chemical changes and the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.052 ↗
17. One-step hydrothermal synthesis and characterisation of Cu-doped TiO2 nanoparticles/nanobucks/nanorods with enhanced photocatalytic performance under simulated solar light10.1007/s10854-019-01766-3 ↗
18. Nanoporous TiO2/polyaniline composite films with enhanced photoelectrochemical properties10.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.099 ↗
19. XPS analysis of K-based reference compounds to allow reliable studies of solid electrolyte interphase in K-ion batteries10.1021/acsaem.1c02400 ↗
20. Sequential processes to produce N-TiO2 films through Rf plasmas10.1051/matecconf/20166706075 ↗
21. A critical analysis of the X-ray photoelectron spectra of Ti3C2Tz MXenes10.1016/j.matt.2021.01.015 ↗
22. Popov, A.A., Tikhonowski, G.V., Shakhov, P.V., Popova-Kuznetsova, E.A., Tselikov, G.I., Romanov, R.I., Markeev, A.M., Klimentov, S.M., and Kabashin, A.V. (2022). Synthesis of titanium nitride nanoparticles by pulsed laser ablation in different aqueous and organic solutions. Nanomaterials, 12.10.3390/nano12101672 ↗
23. Role of the chemical modification of titanium dioxide surface on the interaction with silver nanoparticles and the capability to enhance antimicrobial properties of poly(lactic acid) composites10.1007/s00289-020-03235-y ↗
24. XPS characterization of thin (Al2O3) x (TiO2) 1-x films deposited on silicon10.1088/1742-6596/113/1/012036 ↗
25. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x ↗
26. Observational Study on the Success Rate of Osseointegration: A Prospective Analysis of 15,483 Implants in a Public Health Setting10.3390/biomed2040033 ↗
27. Peri-implantitis—Onset and pattern of progression10.1111/jcpe.12535 ↗
28. Race to invade: Understanding soft tissue integration at the transmucosal region of titanium dental implants10.1016/j.dental.2021.02.005 ↗
29. Campbell, M.K., Farrell, S.O., and McDougal, O.M. (2016). Biochemistry, Cengage Learning. [9th ed.].
30. Bioinorganics and biomaterials: Bone repair10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.027 ↗
31. Effects of calcium ions on titanium surfaces for bone regeneration10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.04.006 ↗
32. Topical pluronic F-127 gel application enhances cutaneous wound healing in rats10.1016/j.acthis.2013.04.010 ↗
33. Mode of action of poloxamer-based surfactants in wound care and efficacy on biofilms10.1111/iwj.12922 ↗
34. Adherence of oral streptococci to nanostructured titanium surfaces10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.011 ↗
35. Barnes, L., and Cooper, I.R. (2015). Biomaterials and Medical Device-Associated Infections, Woodhead Publishing.
36. Astolfi, V., Ríos-Carrasco, B., Gil-Mur, F.J., Ríos-Santos, J.V., Bullón, B., Herrero-Climent, M., and Bullón, P. (2022). Incidence of Peri-Implantitis and Relationship with Different Conditions: A Retrospective Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19074147 ↗
37. Evidence of re-osseointegration after electrolytic cleaning and regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis in humans: A case report with four implants10.1007/s00784-021-04345-1 ↗