journal article·2004-02

Simulation studies of atomic resolution X-ray holography

Yogesh Kashyap, P. S. Sarkar, Amar Sinha, B. K. Godwal

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 27· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

X-ray holography is a new method of structure determination based on measurement of interference of a known reference wave with an unknown object wave (containing information on atomic sites scattering the reference wave) so that phase information is preserved. Unlike X-ray diffraction, it does not demand for translational periodicity in the material. It is based on the idea similar to that of optical holography and has been tested on crystals, quasicrystals, thin films and doped semiconductors for their structure determination. In order to analyse potentials and limitations of this technique, we have carried out theoretical simulation studies on simple structures. In this paper we describe the basic algorithm of hologram generation and reconstruction of atomic positions from generated data. We illustrate this technique using Fe (bcc) single crystal as sample case to demonstrate its capabilities and limitations. Simulations were carried out on the Cu (fcc) structure and on complex structure such as the Al-Pd-Mn quasicrystal. Technical issues such as low signal to noise ratio, twin image problem etc have been discussed briefly to emphasize the need for high intensity X-ray source such as synchrotron for experiments and proper reconstruction algorithm. Finally the scope and potential of this technique have been discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Barton J J 1988Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 135610.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1356 ↗
2. Barton J J 1991Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 310610.1103/PhysRevLett.67.3106 ↗
3. Chidambaram R 2002Proc. of ICQ-8 conf. (to be published)
4. Gabor D 1948Nature 61 77710.1038/161777a0 ↗
5. Gog Tet al 1996Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 313210.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3132 ↗
6. Hayashi Ket al 2001Phys. Rev. B63 041201R10.1103/PhysRevB.63.041201 ↗
7. Hayashi Ket al 2003J. Mater. Sci. 14 459
8. Kashyap Yet al 2003Poster presented in MRSI symposium, BARC, Mumbai
9. Marchesini S and Fadley C S 2003Phys. Rev. B67 02411510.1103/PhysRevB.67.024115 ↗
10. Marchesini Set al 2000Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 472310.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4723 ↗
11. Modak Pet al 2000Philos. Mag. B80 168
12. Szoke A 1986AIP conference proc. (New York: American Institute of Physics) p. 147
13. Takahashi Ket al 2002Mater. Trans. 43 1479
14. Tegze M and Faigel G 1996Nature 380 4910.1038/380049a0 ↗
15. Tegze Met al 1999Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 484710.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4847 ↗