High performance UV–visible avalanche photodetector based on single α-MoO3 microbelt/p-Si heterostructure
Source abstract
Abstract
Broad spectral detection device based on single α-MoO3 microbelt/p-Si heterostructure was fabricated by a simple way. The device based on the α-MoO3 microbelt/p-Si heterostructure shows a fast, high responsivity and broad light detection range from 365 to 660 nm, covering the ultraviolet (UV) and visible regions. The high responsivity, broad spectral detection, fast response and stability make α-MoO3 microbelt/p-Si heterostructure to apply for constructing optoelectronic devices. Furthermore, it will provide a new way for fabrication of high-performance broad spectral detection device.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Ga2O3 and related materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Alghamdi S B 2020 EJBIO 1 13410.24018/ejbio.2020.1.6.134 ↗
2. Chang T J and Hsueh T J 2020 J. Electrochem. Soc. 167 02752110.1149/1945-7111/ab69f0 ↗
3. Young S J and Tang L W 2019 J. Electrochem. Soc. 166 304710.1149/2.0071909jes ↗
4. Zhang T, Xu Z, Chen J, Li M, Lu Y and He Y 2020 J. Alloys Compd. 833 15503210.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155032 ↗
5. Zhao Y, Feng K, Yao C W and Li Z G 2020 Surf. Coat. Technol. 387 12547710.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125477 ↗
6. Liu K, Sakurai M and Aono M 2020 Sensors 10 860410.3390/s100908604 ↗
7. Hosseinifar M, Ahmadi V and Ebnali-Heidari M 2017 Opt. Commun. 397 1010.1016/j.optcom.2017.03.071 ↗
8. Cui J and Zhou Z 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 514110.1364/OL.42.005141 ↗
9. Wang L, Li M C, Zhang G H and Xue Z L 2020 High Temp. Mat. PR-ISR 39 62010.1515/htmp-2020-0093 ↗
10. Tewari S, Biswas A and Mallik A 2016 IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 63 231310.1109/TED.2016.2548518 ↗
11. Tao Y R, Wu X C and Xiong W W 2014 Small 10 490510.1002/smll.201401376 ↗
12. Giehl A R, Gumbel M, Schwender C, Herhammer N and Fouckhardt H 2004 IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 16 135810.1109/LPT.2004.825985 ↗
13. Gowtham B, Ponnuswamy V, Pradeesh G, Chandrasekaran J and Aradhana D 2018 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 29 6835
14. Kodan N, Singh A P, Vandichel M, Wickman B and Mehta B R 2018 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 43 1577310.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.138 ↗
15. Zhang W, Lan W, Lee M H, Singh J and Zhu F 2018 Org. Electron. 52 110.1016/j.orgel.2017.10.005 ↗
16. Qasrawi A F and Kayed T S 2020 Phys. Scr. 96 01580210.1088/1402-4896/abc384 ↗
17. Liu Y J, Cen G B, Wang G, Huang J W, Zhou S H, Zheng J B et al 2019 J. Mater. Chem. C 7 91710.1039/C8TC05850D ↗
18. Dong B, Huang Y, Yu N, Fang Y, Cao B, Li Y et al 2010 Chem. Asian J. 5 182410.1002/asia.200900706 ↗
19. Lien D H, Dong Z, Retamal J R D, Wang H P, Wei T C, Wang D et al 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 187025710.1002/adma.201870257 ↗
20. Dang V Q, Trung T Q, Kim D I, Duy L T, Hwang B U, Lee D W et al 2015 Small 11 305410.1002/smll.201403625 ↗
21. Zheng Q H, Huang J, Yang H Y and Chen Y Q 2017 Nanotechnology 28 04520210.1088/1361-6528/28/4/045202 ↗
22. Ahmad H, Afzal N, Rafique M, Ahmed A A, Ahmad R and Khaliq Z 2020 Ceram. Int. 46 2047710.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.150 ↗
23. Zhong M Z, Zhou K, Wei Z M, Li Y, Li T, Dong H L et al 2018 2D Mater. 5 03503310.1088/2053-1583/aac65e ↗
24. Li L, Lou Z and Shen G 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 2350710.1021/acsami.5b06070 ↗
25. Chao J, Xing S, Liu Z, Zhang X, Zhao Y, Zhao L et al 2018 Mater. Res. Bull. 98 19410.1016/j.materresbull.2017.10.026 ↗
26. Eisenberg I, Alpern H, Gutkin V, Yochelis S and Paltiel Y 2015 Sens. Actuators A Phys. 233 2610.1016/j.sna.2015.06.022 ↗