journal article·2021-09

Synthesis and characterization of L-threonine ammonium bromide: grown on single crystal with experimental studies on NLO

T KALAIARASI, M SENTHILKUMAR, S SHANMUGAN, T JARIN, V CHITHAMBARAM, KISHOR KUMAR SADASIVUNI, M NAGARAJAN

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

L-threonine ammonium bromide (LTAB) is a significant nonlinear optical (NLO) material. The crystal has been grown by the slow evaporation technique (SET). Ammonium bromide has properties, which are that of chiral molecules and zwitterions environmental benefits due to advance NLO properties of LTAB. L-threonine-doped ammonium bromide crystals are grown using SET at ambient temperature. In this study, the unit cell factors are derived from X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies. The powder XRD spectra suggests the formation of orthorhombic crystal system. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis depicts the different functional groups offered in the grown crystals. The study of optical transmittance was done by crystals utilizing ultraviolet, visible, spectral analytical methods. Further, the minimum cutoff wavelength of the grown crystal has been recognized as 220 nm. The overall result of the second harmonic generation (SHG) efficiency is depicted higher and nearly around LTAB obtained crystal which is greater than potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP). It proves the potential application of LTAB crystal in optoelectronic industries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Research · Crystal structures of chemical compounds · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Subhashini R, Sathya D, Sivashankar V, Mageshwari P L and Arjunan S 2016 Optic. Mater. 62 35710.1016/j.optmat.2016.09.041 ↗
2. Theras M, Kalaivani D, Mercina M, Jayaraman D and Joseph V 2016 Optik 127 339710.1016/j.ijleo.2015.12.107 ↗
3. Theras M, Kalaivani D, Jayaraman D and Joseph V 2015 J. Cryst. Growth 427 2910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.06.009 ↗
4. Suresh T, Vetrivel S, Gopinath S and Jothi R A 2019 Chem. Data Collect. 21 100210.1016/j.cdc.2019.100232 ↗
5. Ramesh Kumar G and Gokul Raj S 2009 Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1 40
6. Zhang H, Zhu L and Sun R 2014 J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 9 67
7. Vivekanandhan R, Raju K, Dhas S S J and Chithambaram V 2018 Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 13 13454
8. Jagadeesh M, Suresh Kumar H and Ananda Kumari R 2017 Mater. Res. Innovat. 21 39110.1080/14328917.2016.1265245 ↗
9. Aarthi J, Gowri S and Sornambal M 2018 Mech. Mechanic. Eng. 22 126110.2478/mme-2018-0097 ↗
10. Masilamani S, Musthafa A M and Krishnamurthi P 2017 Arab. J. Chem. 10 S396210.1016/j.arabjc.2014.06.003 ↗
11. Gahane N, Meshram N, Sawadh P and Rewatkar K 2013 Indian J. Adv. Chem. Sci. 1 193
12. Shingade B, Sawadh P, Belekar R and Rewatkar K 2017 Int. J. Adv. Innovat. Res. 4 173
13. Thilakavathi G, Arun Kumar R, Kumaresh A and Ravikumar N 2016 Mater. Res. Innovat. 20 25410.1080/14328917.2015.1105569 ↗
14. Sathya A, Yasotha P and Sagunthala P 2015 Int. J. Chem. Phys. Sci. 4 105
15. Joshi J H, Kalainathan S, Kanchan D K, Joshi M J and Parikh K D 2020 Arab. J. Chem. 13 153210.1016/j.arabjc.2017.12.005 ↗
16. Kurtz S and Perry T 1968 J. Appl. Phys. 39 379810.1063/1.1656857 ↗