journal article·2020-12

Effect of reaction temperature on the structural and electronic properties of stannic oxide nanostructures

Nirmala Rani, Neena Jaggi

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Different nanostructured materials are having important roles in optoelectronics, gas sensing and photocatalytic applications due to their high surface to volume ratio. In this study, stannic oxide (SnO2) nanostructures are prepared by hydrothermal method under optimal conditions at different temperatures (160, 180 and 200°C) using surfactant cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide. X-ray diffraction studies reveal rutile tetragonal structures of SnO2 nanostructures, showing that average crystallite size is less than 10 nm. Field emission scanning electron microscope imaging reveals the morphological analysis of SnO2 nanostructures fabricated at different reaction temperatures (160, 180 and 200°C). Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the elemental analysis of SnO2 nanostructures. FTIR spectrum is recorded to confirm the presence of various functional and vibrational groups in the prepared SnO2 nanostructures. Optical properties of these nanostructures are analysed by UV–vis absorption studies. Bandgap of prepared SnO2 decreased with increasing reaction temperature. Two-probe setup along with Keithley source metre is used for analysis of electrical properties of SnO2 nanostructures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · ZnO doping and properties · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Kajal P, Pooja D and Jaggi N 2016 Mater. Res. Express 3 610.1088/2053-1591/3/6/065011 ↗
2. Abdullah M M and Abbas S 2012 Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 4 3
3. Kumar S, Nigam R, Kundu V and Jaggi N 2015 J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 26 510.1007/s10856-014-5328-8 ↗
4. Kuang Q, Lao C, Wang Z L, Xie Z and Zheng L 2007 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 1910.1021/ja070788m ↗
5. Xu M, Cai F, Yin J, Yuan Z and Bie L 2010 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 145 210.1016/j.snb.2010.01.002 ↗
6. Kida T, Fujiyama S, Suematsu K, Yuasa M and Shimanoe K 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 3410.1021/jp4045226 ↗
7. Chen J S, Wen X and Lou D 2013 Small 9 11
8. Manjula P, Boppella R and Manorama S V 2012 ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 4 1110.1021/am301840s ↗
9. Talebian N and Jafarinezhad F 2013 Ceram. Int. 39 7
10. Sial M A Z G, Iqbal M, Siddique Z, Nadeem M A, Ishaq M and Iqbal A 2017 J. Mol. Struct. 1144 35510.1016/j.molstruc.2017.05.067 ↗
11. Wang L, Wang S, Wang Y, Zhang H and Kang Y 2013 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 188 93
12. Tripathi A and Shukla R K 2014 Bull. Mater. Sci. 37 310.1007/s12034-014-0695-9 ↗
13. Yadav K, Dwivedi Y and Jaggi N 2015 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 26 4
14. Liu Z, Zhang D, Han S, Li C, Tang T, Jin W et al 2003 Adv. Mater. 15 20
15. Arularasu M V, Anbarasu M, Poovaragan S, Sundaram R, Kanimozhi K, Magdalane K et al 2018 J. Nanosci. Nanotech. 18 510.1166/jnn.2018.14658 ↗
16. Patil G E, Kajale D D, Gaikwad V B and Jain G H 2012 Int. Nano Lett. 2 110.1186/2228-5326-2-17 ↗
17. Li M, Lu Q, Nuli Y and Qian X 2007 Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 10 8
18. Parthibavarman M, Sathishkumar S and Prabhakaran S 2018 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 29 3
19. Müller R, Hernandez-Ramirez F, Shen H, Du H, Mader W and Mathur S 2012 Chem. Mater. 24 402810.1021/cm300913h ↗
20. Khuspe G D, Sakhare R D, Navale S T, Chougule M A, Kolekar Y D and Mulik R N 2013 Ceram. Int. 39 810.1016/j.ceramint.2013.04.047 ↗
21. Wang J X, Liu D F, Yan X Q, Yuan H J, Ci L J, Zhou Z P et al 2004 Solid State Commun. 130 2
22. Das S, Kar S and Chaudhuri S 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 11
23. Shaalan N M, Yamazaki T and Kikuta T 2011 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 153 110.1016/j.snb.2010.09.070 ↗
24. Budak S, Miao G X, Ozdemir M, Chetry K B and Gupta A 2006 J. Cryst. Growth 291 210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.03.045 ↗
25. Guo C, Cao M and Hu C 2004 Inorg. Chem. Commun. 7 7
26. Mi Wang, Gao Yanfeng, Dai Lei, Cao Chuanxiang and Guo Xuhong 2012 J. Solid State Chem. 189 5610.1016/j.jssc.2012.01.021 ↗
27. Begum S and Ahmaruzzaman M 2018 Water Res. 129 48510.1016/j.watres.2017.11.031 ↗
28. Farrukh M A, Teck H B and Adnan R 2010 Turkish J. Chem. 34 4
29. Wang Y, Wu X, Li Y and Zhou Z 2004 Solid-State Electron. 48 5
30. Barakat M A Y, Shaban M and Sayed A M El 2018 Mater. Res. Exp. 5 6
31. Mohana S and Geetha P A 2016 J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol. 78 2
32. Khatter J and Chauhan R P 2020 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 31 2676
33. Gaber A, Rahim M A A and Abdel-Salam M N 2014 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 9 110.1016/S1452-3981(23)07699-X ↗
34. Gondal M A, Drmosh Q A and Saleh T A 2010 Appl. Surface Sci. 256 2310.1016/j.apsusc.2010.05.027 ↗
35. Nandan B, Venugopal B, Amirthapandian S, Panigrahi B K and Thangadurai P 2013 J. Nanopart. Res. 15 1010.1007/s11051-013-1999-1 ↗
36. Ashok Kumar K, Ramesh D, Gunaseelan M, Subalakshmi K and Senthilselvan J 2015 Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 68 210.1007/s12666-015-0563-3 ↗
37. Pawar B G, Pinjari D V, Kolekar S S, Pandit A B and Han S H 2012 ISRN Chem. Eng. 2012 710.5402/2012/954869 ↗
38. Baraneedharan P and Siva C 2014 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 25 1
39. Subramaniam M P, Arunachalam G, Kandasamy R, Veluswamy P and Hiroya I 2018 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 29 1
40. Ravikumar K, Agilan S, Muthukumarasamy N, Raja M, Lakshmanan R and Ganesh R 2018 Silicon 10 4