journal article·2019-10

Effect of non-$$180\circ $$ polarization invariants on the exchange bias of tetragonal $$\langle 001\rangle $$ and rhombohedral $$\langle 111\rangle $$ orientations of bismuth ferrite epitaxial thin films

M M Sajmohan, R Ranjith, J A Chelvane

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

(hbox {BiFeO}3) (BFO) is the only room temperature multiferroic material that has been extensively studied due to its multifunctional properties. BFO with a canted G-type antiferromagnetic (AFM) ordering exhibits strong exchange bias characteristics with NiFe which offers the potential to design and utilize devices working based on multiferroic features. In the past, it was known that the presence of (180circ ) domain walls of BFO hinders a plausible exchange bias interaction. To understand the role of the strain-induced effects on such (180circ ) domain walls and its effect on the exchange bias, NiFe, a soft ferromagnetic layer, was grown on the epitaxial BFO AFM layers. An approximately 80 nm BFO layer was grown epitaxially in both the tetragonal (001) phase on the (hbox {LaAlO}3) (001) substrate and the rhombohedral (111) phase on the (hbox {SrTiO}3) (111) substrate, with a thin (10 nm) layer of (hbox {Ni}80hbox {Fe}20) on top of it. An exchange bias of 510 Oe was observed in the tetragonal phase of BFO with a c / a ratio of 1.22, which is comparable with the exchange bias shown by the (111) oriented rhombohedral phase (360 Oe). Both the tetragonal (001) and rhombohedral (111) layers possess ferroelectric polarization normal to the sample surface and so the domain walls are mostly (180circ ) oriented which is expected to have a minimum effect on the exchange bias. However, the weak strain-induced structural variants in the (111) oriented rhombohedral BFO and the monoclinic distortion present in the tetragonal BFO introduce non-(180circ ) domain walls in the system. These variants arising due to the structural distortion are expected to play a key role in defining the ferroelectric domain wall nature, thereby exhibiting exchange bias characteristics.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Reohr W, Honigschmid H, Robertazzi R, Gogl D, Pesavento F, Lammers S et al 2002 IEEE Circuits Devices Mag. 18 1710.1109/MCD.2002.1035347 ↗
2. Binek C and Doudin B 2005 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17 3910.1088/0953-8984/17/2/L06 ↗
3. Wang J, Neaton J B, Zheng H, Nagarajan V, Ogale S B, Liu B et al 2003 Science 299 171910.1126/science.1080615 ↗
4. Bertinshaw J, Maran R, Callori S J, Ramesh V, Cheung J, Danilkin S A et al 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 1266410.1038/ncomms12664 ↗
5. Zhang J X, Xiang B, He Q, Seidel J, Zeches R J, Yu P et al 2009 Science 326 97710.1126/science.1177046 ↗
6. Ramesh R and Spaldin N A 2007 Nature Mater. 6 210.1038/nmat1805 ↗
7. Sajmohan M M, Bandyopadhyay S, Jogi T, Bhattacharya S and Ramadurai R 2019 J. Appl. Phys. 125 01250110.1063/1.5054372 ↗
8. Sajmohan M M, Sreenath M V and Ranjith R MRS Adv. 3 271310.1557/adv.2018.463 ↗
9. Sajmohan M M and Ranjith R 2018 AIP Conf. Proc. 1942 8004010.1063/1.5028874 ↗
10. Choi T, Lee S, Choi Y J, Kiryukhin V and Cheong S W 2009 Science 324 6310.1126/science.1168636 ↗
11. Chu S H, Singh D J, Wang J, Li E P and Ong K P 2012 Laser Photonics Rev. 6 68410.1002/lpor.201280022 ↗
12. Nogules J and Schuller I K 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192 20310.1016/S0304-8853(98)00266-2 ↗
13. Dong S, Yamauchi K, Yunoki S, Yu R, Liang S, Moreo A et al 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 5
14. Bea H, Bibes M, Cherifi S, Nolting F, Warot-Fonrose B, Fusil S et al 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 24211410.1063/1.2402204 ↗
15. Martin L W, Chu Y H, Zhan Q, Ramesh R, Han S J, Wang S X et al 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 1
16. Bea H, Bibes M, Ott F, Dupe B, Zhu X H, Petit S et al 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.017204 ↗
17. Dho J and Blamire M G 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 106 110.1063/1.3240338 ↗
18. Heron J T, Schlom D G and Ramesh R 2014 Appl. Phys. Rev. 1 2130310.1063/1.4870957 ↗
19. Dho J and Blamire M G 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 106 7391410.1063/1.3240338 ↗
20. Zhao T, Scholl A, Zavaliche F, Lee K, Barry M, Doran A et al 2006 Nat. Mater. 5 82310.1038/nmat1731 ↗
21. Bai F, Yu G, Wang Y, Jin L, Zeng H, Tang X et al 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 09240110.1063/1.4748160 ↗
22. Xu Q, Yuan X, Xue X, Shi Z, Wen Z and Du J 2014 Phys. Status Solidi B 251 89210.1002/pssb.201350079 ↗
23. Venkataiah G, Anupama S, Katsuyoshi K, Mitsuru I and Tomoyasu T 2017 Phys. Status Solidi RRL 11 170029410.1002/pssr.201700294 ↗
24. Bea H, Bibes M, Barthlmy A, Bouzehouane K, Jacquet E, Khodan A et al 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 110.1063/1.2009808 ↗
25. Li J, Wang J, Wuttig M, Ramesh R, Wang N, Ruette B et al 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 526110.1063/1.1764944 ↗
26. Saito K, Ulyanenkov A, Grossmann V, Ress H, Bruegemann L, Ohta H et al 2006 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45 731110.1143/JJAP.45.7311 ↗
27. Zhang N, Yokota H, Glazer A M, Ren Z, Keen D A, Keeble D S et al 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 523110.1038/ncomms6231 ↗
28. Hatt A J, Spaldin N A and Ederer C 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 5410910.1103/PhysRevB.81.054109 ↗
29. Martin L W, Chu Y H, Holcomb M B, Huijben M, Yu P, Han S J et al 2008 Nano Lett. 8 205010.1021/nl801391m ↗
30. Dipanjan M, Vilas S, Milko I, Stephen J, Amit K, Kalinin S V et al 2010 Nano Lett. 10 255510.1021/nl101187a ↗