journal article·2016-10

Effect of ‘Al’ concentration on spin-dependent resonant tunnelling in InAs/Ga1−y Al y As symmetrical double-barrier heterostructures

L BRUNO CHANDRASEKAR, K GNANASEKAR, M KARUNAKARAN, R CHANDRAMOHAN

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 39· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The effect of ‘Al’ concentration on spin-dependent tunnelling in strained non-magnetic symmetric double-barrier semiconductor has been theoretically investigated. The separation between spin-up and spin-down components, barrier transparency, polarization efficiency and tunnelling lifetime were calculated using the transfer matrix approach. The separation between spin-up and spin-down resonances and tunnelling lifetime were reported for the first time in the case of InAs/Ga1−y Al y As heterostructures for various ‘Al’ concentrations and for various barrier widths. Cent percentage polarization can be obtained in this strained non-magnetic double-barrier semiconductor even without any external field.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang W, Chang K and Zhang S C 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 05660210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.056602 ↗
2. de Andrada eSilva E A, La Rocca G C and Bassani F 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 852310.1103/PhysRevB.50.8523 ↗
3. Dresselhaus G 1955 Phys. Rev. 100 58010.1103/PhysRev.100.580 ↗
4. Rashba E I 1960 Sov. Phys. Solid State 2 1109
5. Tsu R and Esaki L 1973 Appl. Phys. Lett. 22 56210.1063/1.1654509 ↗
6. Wang H, Xu H and Zhang Y 2006 Phys. Lett. A 355 48110.1016/j.physleta.2006.04.007 ↗
7. Paranjape V V 1995 Phys. Rev. B 52 1074010.1103/PhysRevB.52.10740 ↗
8. Wang X H, Gu B Y and Yang G Z 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 934010.1103/PhysRevB.55.9340 ↗
9. Voskoboynikov A, Liu S S and Lee C P 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1251410.1103/PhysRevB.59.12514 ↗
10. Gnanasekar K and Navaneethakrishnan K 2005 Physica E 28 32810.1016/j.physe.2005.04.002 ↗
11. Perel V I, Tarasenko S A, Yassievich I N, Ganichev S D, Bel’kov V V and Prettl W 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 20130410.1103/PhysRevB.67.201304 ↗
12. Perel V I, Tarasenko S A, Yassievich I N, Ganichev S D, Bel’kov V V and Prettl W 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 201304(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.67.201304 ↗
13. Gong J, Liang X X and Ban S L 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 07371810.1063/1.2794378 ↗
14. Gerardin Jayam S. and Navaneethakrishnan K 2003 Solid State Comm. 126 68110.1016/S0038-1098(03)00209-6 ↗
15. Gnanasekar K and Navaneethakrishnan K 2005 Phys. Lett. A 341 49510.1016/j.physleta.2005.03.089 ↗