journal article·2019-12

Elucidation of structural, morphological, optical and photoluminescence properties of single and (In, Ga) co-doped ZnO nanocrystalline thin films

M Shaheera, K G Girija, Manmeet Kaur, V Geetha, A K Debnath, R K Vatsa, K P Muthe, S C Gadkari

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Single and co-doped ZnO thin films are currently under intense investigation and development for optoelectronic applications. Here in this study, pristine, indium-doped (IZO), gallium-doped (GZO) and co-doped (IGZO) ZnO thin films were deposited on a glass substrate using radio frequency magnetron sputtering. A comparative study of all the films was carried out on the basis of their various properties. The effect of single and co-doping on the structural (X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies and Raman studies), morphological (field emission scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy studies) and optical properties (ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) and photoluminescence (PL)) of the deposited films was investigated. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization was employed to analyse the surface chemical composition and bonding of the deposited film. From the XRD patterns, it was found that the films were highly crystalline in nature and preferentially oriented along the (002) direction with a hexagonal wurtzite structure, consistent with Raman analysis. IGZO films displayed a dramatic improvement in the surface morphology as compared with the single dopant films due to the compensation effect of gallium and indium doping which reduced the lattice strain. The XPS analysis confirmed the presence of the oxidized dopants in each film. All thin films have shown excellent optical properties with more than 90% transmission in the visible range of light. The blue-shift of the absorption edge accompanied by the increase of the optical band gap confirmed the Burstein–Moss effect. The UV PL peak originated from the near band edge emission of crystalline ZnO, while the visible PL was associated with the radiative transition related to oxygen interstitial (Oi) defects in the ZnO structure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Jayaraman V K, Alvarez A M, de la luz M and Amador O 2017 Physica E 86 16410.1016/j.physe.2016.10.029 ↗
2. Wang F-H and Chang C-L 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 370 8310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.161 ↗
3. Snigurenko D, Guziewicz E, Krajewski T A, Jakiela R, Syryanyy Y, Kopalko K et al 2016 Mater. Res. Express 3 12590710.1088/2053-1591/3/12/125907 ↗
4. Li X, Yang Y, Wu X, Zhang F C and Yang H 2018 Ferroelectr. 530 1110.1080/00150193.2018.1453707 ↗
5. Shahid M U, Deen K M, Ahmad A, Akram M A, Aslam M and Akhtar W 2016 Appl. Nano Sci. 6 23510.1007/s13204-015-0425-7 ↗
6. Castro M V and Tavares C J 2015 Thin Solid Films 586 1310.1016/j.tsf.2015.04.036 ↗
7. You H-C 2013 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 8 977310.1016/S1452-3981(23)13011-2 ↗
8. Al-Asedu H J, Bidis N, Al Khafaji S A and Bakhtiar H 2018 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 77 5010.1016/j.mssp.2018.01.011 ↗
9. Benhaliliba M, Benouis C E, Aida M S, Yakuphanoglu F and Sanchez Juarez A 2010 J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol. 55 33510.1007/s10971-010-2258-x ↗
10. Chang S-C 2014 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 9 56210.1186/1556-276X-9-562 ↗
11. Chang S-C 2014 Int. J. Photoenergy 2014 916189
12. Gaspara D, Pereiraa L, Gehrke K, Galler B, Fortunato E and Martins R 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 163 25510.1016/j.solmat.2017.01.030 ↗
13. Singh K, Dhar R and Mohan D 2016 J. Integr. Sci. Technol. 4 33
14. Jayathilake D S Y, Nirmal Peiris T A, Sagu J S, Potter D B, Wijayantha K G U, Carmalt C J et al 2017 ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5 482010.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00263 ↗
15. Wahab H A, Salama A A, El-Saeid A A, Nur O, Willande M and Battisha I K 2013 Results Phys. 3 4610.1016/j.rinp.2013.01.005 ↗
16. Jayaraman V K, Álvarez A M, Kuwabara Y M, Koudriavstev Y, de la luz M and Amador O 2016 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 47 3210.1016/j.mssp.2016.02.011 ↗
17. Bidier S A, Hashim M R, Al-Diabat A M and Bououdina M 2017 Physica E 88 16910.1016/j.physe.2017.01.009 ↗
18. Le H Q and Chua S J 2011 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 44 12510410.1088/0022-3727/44/12/125104 ↗
19. Gadallah A S and El Nahass M M 2013 Adv. Cond. Mat. Phys. 2013 Article ID 23454610.1155/2013/234546 ↗
20. Rouchdi M, Salmani E, Fares B, Hassanain N and Mzerd A 2017 Results Phys. 7 62010.1016/j.rinp.2017.01.023 ↗
21. Chirakkara S and Krupanidhi S B 2011 Phys. Status Solidi RRL 6 3410.1002/pssr.201105455 ↗
22. Wang F-H, Chao J-C, Liu H-W and Kang T-K 2015 J. Nanomater 2015 936482
23. Duan J, Xiong Q, Hu J and Wang H 2015 J. Power Energy Eng. 3 1110.4236/jpee.2015.312002 ↗
24. Zhu Y, Mendelsberg R J, Zhu J, Han J and Anders A 2013 Appl. Surf. Sci. 265 73810.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.096 ↗
25. Tohsophon T, Wattanasupinyo N, Silskulsuk B and Sirikulrat N 2013 Thin Solid Films 520 72610.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.079 ↗
26. Abbasi M A, Ibupoto Z H, Hussain M, Nur O and Willander M 2013 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8 32010.1186/1556-276X-8-320 ↗
27. Allabergenov B, Chung S-H, Jeong S M, Kim S and Choi B 2013 Opt. Mater. Express 3 173310.1364/OME.3.001733 ↗
28. Alvi N H, Ul Hasan K, Nur O and Willander M 2011 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6 130