Effect of different carbon fillers and dopant acids on electrical properties of polyaniline nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrically conducting nanocomposites of polyaniline (PANI) with carbon-based fillers have evinced considerable interest for various applications such as rechargeable batteries, microelectronics, sensors, electrochromic displays and light-emitting and photovoltaic devices. The nature of both the carbon filler and the dopant acid can significantly influence the conductivity of these nanocomposites. This paper describes the effects of carbon fillers like carbon black (CB), graphite (GR) and muti-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and of dopant acids like methane sulfonic acid (MSA), camphor sulfonic acid (CSA), hydrochloric acid (HCl) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) on the electrical conductivity of PANI. The morphological, structural and electrical properties of neat PANI and carbon–PANI nanocomposites were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT–IR), UV–Vis spectroscopy and the four-point probe technique, respectively. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies were also conducted for different PANI composites. The results show that PANI and carbon–PANI composites with organic acid dopants show good thermal stability and higher electrical conductivity than those with inorganic acid dopants. Also, carbon–PANI composites generally show higher electrical conductivity than neat PANI, with highest conductivities for PANI–CNT composites. Thus, in essence, PANI–CNT composites prepared using organic acid dopants are most suitable for conducting applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Bhadra S, Khastgir D, Sinha N K and Lee J H 2009 Prog. Polym. Sci. 34 78310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.003 ↗
2. Bourdo S E and Viswanathan T 2005 Carbon 43 298310.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.016 ↗
3. Chiang J C and MacDiarmid A G 1986 Synth. Met. 13 19310.1016/0379-6779(86)90070-6 ↗
4. Cochet M, Maser W K, Benito A M, Callejas M A, Martinez M T, Benoit J, Schreiber J and Chauvet O 2001 Chem. Commun. 16 145010.1039/b104009j ↗
5. Cortes M T and Sierra E V 2006 Polym. Bull. 56 3710.1007/s00289-005-0467-1 ↗
6. Du X S, Xiao M and Meng Y Z 2004 Eur. Polym. J. 40 148910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.02.009 ↗
7. Feast W J, Tsibouklis J, Pouwer K L, Groenendaal L and Meijer E W 1996 Polymer 37 501710.1016/0032-3861(96)00439-9 ↗
8. Fu Y and Weiss R A 1997 Synth. Met. 84 10310.1016/S0379-6779(97)80667-4 ↗
9. Ghatak S, Chakraborty G, Meikap A K, Woods T, Babu R and Blau W J 2010 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 119 101610.1002/app.31962 ↗
10. Ghosh P, Siddhanta S K, Samir K S, Rejaul Haque S and Amit Chakrabarti 2001 Synth. Met. 123 8310.1016/S0379-6779(00)00579-8 ↗
11. Gopalan A I, Lee K P, Santhosh P, Kim K S and Nho Y C 2007 Compos. Sci. Technol. 67 90010.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.036 ↗
12. Hopkins A R, Rasmussen P G and Basheer R A 1996 Macromolecules 29 783810.1021/ma9606519 ↗
13. Jeevananda T, Siddaramaiah, Nam Hoon Kim, Seok-Bong Heo and Jonng Hee Lee 2008 Polym. Adv. Technol. 19 175410.1002/pat.1191 ↗
14. Kahol P K, Satheesh Kumar K K, Geetha S and Trivedi D C 2003 Synth. Met. 139 19110.1016/S0379-6779(02)01321-8 ↗
15. Kapil A, Taunk M and Chand S 2009 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 21 39910.1007/s10854-009-9931-2 ↗
16. Koul S, Chandra R and Dhawan S K 2000 Polymer 41 930510.1016/S0032-3861(00)00340-2 ↗
17. Kulkarni V G, Campbell L D and Mathew W R 1989 Synth. Met. 30 32110.1016/0379-6779(89)90654-1 ↗
18. Levon K, Ho K H, Zheng W Y, Laakso J, Karna T, Taka T and Osterholm J E 1995 Polymer 36 273310.1016/0032-3861(95)93650-B ↗
19. Liu H, Hu X B, Wang J Y and Boughton R I 2002 Macromolecules 35 941410.1021/ma0119326 ↗
20. MacDiarmid, Epstein Alan G and Arthur J 1995 Synth. Met. 69 8510.1016/0379-6779(94)02374-8 ↗
21. Maser W K et al 2003 Mater. Sci. Eng. 23 8710.1016/S0928-4931(02)00235-7 ↗
22. Nikzad L, Alibeigi S, Vaezi M R, Yazdani B and Rahimipour M R 2009 Chem. Eng. Technol. 32 86110.1002/ceat.200800470 ↗
23. Pron A, Genoud F, Menardo C and Nechtschein M 1988 Synth. Met. 24 19310.1016/0379-6779(88)90257-3 ↗
24. Reddy K R, Sin B C, Ryu K S, Noh J and Lee Y 2009 Synth. Met. 159 193410.1016/j.synthmet.2009.06.018 ↗
25. Saini P, Choudhary V, Sinha B P, Mathur R B and Dhawan S K 2009 Mater. Chem. Phys. 113 91910.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.08.065 ↗
26. Saraswathi R and Gajendran P 2008 Pure Appl. Chem. 80 237710.1351/pac200880112377 ↗
27. Sinha S, Bhadra S and Khastgir D 2009 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 112 313510.1002/app.29708 ↗
28. Su Bitao, Tong Youngchung, Bai Jie, Lie Ziqiang, Wang Ke, Mu Hongmei and Dong Na 2007 Indian J. Chem. A46 595
29. Syed A A and Dinesan M K 1991 Talanta 38 81510.1016/0039-9140(91)80261-W ↗
30. Zengin H et al 2002 Adv. Mater. 14 148010.1002/1521-4095(20021016)14:20<1480::AID-ADMA1480>3.0.CO;2-O ↗