journal article·2023-04-15

Numerical simulation for the high efficient performance signature of TO/ZnO/In2S3/WS2/CZTS based solar cell structure

Pratap Kumar Dakua, Deepak Kumar Panda, Baraa Riyadh Altahan, Lassaad K Smirani, MD Amzad Hossain, Ahmed Nabih Zaki Rashed

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Copper zinc tin sulphur (CZTS) based solar cells (SCs) became a suitable thin film-based photovoltaic device due to their non-toxic constituents and abundance in nature. The high absorption coefficient with a tunable band gap makes it a suitable material for the next-generation-based SCs. CZTS-based SC models demonstrate higher performance. The overall tuning of CZTS-based SCs to improve efficiency is quite difficult. The overall optimization is addressed by considering both the band gap and thickness of the CZTS layer and buffer layers. This study addresses a novel method of using two materials as buffer layers to enhance cell efficiency. The device performance has been improved based on bi-layer buffer materials proposed in this study. The present study uses a SCAPS-1D SC simulator to numerically investigate CZTS/WS2/In2S3-based SC structures, including ZnO as the window layer and CZTS as the absorber layer. The overall optimization has been considered by taking the contour plots among thickness vs. band gap and bandgap vs. band gap. The device’s efficiency is recorded as 22.96% when the optimum values of the buffer layer are considered. This work reveals a new idea to fabricate a highly efficient SC based on CZTS material for the next-generation photovoltaic device.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Pal K, Singh P, Bhaduri A and Thapa B 2019 Sol. Eng. Mat. Sol. Cell 196 13810.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.001 ↗
2. Grossberg M, Krustok J, Hages C J, Bishop D M, Gunawan O et al 2019 Phys. Energy 1 1
3. Jhuma F A, Shaily M Z and Rashid M J 2019 Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 8 110.1007/s40243-019-0144-1 ↗
4. Burgelman M, Nollet P and Degrave S 2000 Thin Sol. Films 361 52710.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-1 ↗
5. Kaur K, Kumar N and Kumar M 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 306910.1039/C6TA10543B ↗
6. Mahbub R, Saidul Islam M, Anwar F, Sarwar S and Saeed U 2016 South Asian J. Eng. Technol. 2 1
7. Patel M and Ray A 2012 Phys. B Condens. Matter 407 439110.1016/j.physb.2012.07.042 ↗
8. Xu J, Lin J and Zhuang C 2018 Sol. Energy 164 23110.1016/j.solener.2018.02.066 ↗
9. Gupta G K and Dixit A 2018 Opt. Mater. 82 1110.1016/j.optmat.2018.05.030 ↗
10. Tumbul A, Aslan F, Goktas A and Mutlu I H 2019 J. Alloys Compd. 781 28010.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.012 ↗
11. Son D H, Kim Y I, Kim S H, Nam D, Cheong H, Kang J K et al 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A. 7 2298610.1039/C9TA08319G ↗
12. Huang T J, Yin X, Qi G and Gong H 2014 Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 8 73510.1002/pssr.201409219 ↗
13. Gao S, Jian Z, Wu L, Jianping A, Zeng Y, Sun Y et al 2018 Phys. B 27 1
14. Chadel M, Chadel A, Bouzaki M M, Aillerie M, Benyoucef B and Charles J P 2017 Mater. Res. Express 4 1110.1088/2053-1591/aa95df ↗
15. Singh P and Ravindra N M 2012 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 101 364510.1016/j.solmat.2012.02.019 ↗
16. Li J, Wang H, Luo M, Tang J, Chen C, Liu W et al 2016 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 149 24210.1016/j.solmat.2016.02.002 ↗
17. Sharbati M, Norouzzadeh E and Mohammadi S 2018 Opt. Mater. 78 25910.1016/j.optmat.2018.02.032 ↗
18. Cherouana A and Labbani R 2017 Appl. Surf. Sci. 424 25110.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.027 ↗
19. Sadanand and Dwivedi D K 2020 Optik 222 110.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165407 ↗
20. Wang W, Winkler M T, Gunawan O, Gokmen T, Teodor K T, Zhu Y et al 2013 AEM Wiley 4 1