journal article·2020-12

Temperature-dependence calculation of lattice thermal conductivity and related parameters for the zinc blende and wurtzite structures of InAs nanowires

Hawbash H Karim, M S Omar

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Theoretical calculations are performed on lattice thermal conductivity (LTC) and related parameters for the zinc blende and wurtzite structure of InAs nanowires (NWs) with diameters of 50, 63, 66, 100 and 148 nm through the Morelli–Callaway model. For the model to be efficiently applicable, the longitudinal and transverse modes are considered. The melting point of the various-sized NWs is considered to estimate the Debye and phonon group velocities. The impacts of Gruneisen parameter, dislocations and surface roughness are also successfully utilized to address the calculated and measured LTC of the semiconductor under investigation. Results show that the Gruneisen parameter increases with decreasing NW diameter and that phonon confinement leads to an observable deviation of the calculated LTC curve from that of the experimental one in the case of bulk InAs. We assume that NW boundaries, dislocations and imperfections are responsible for the scattering of phonons along with electrons and other phonons because of normal and Umklapp processes. Therefore, at a specified temperature, LTC depends on the size and crystal structure of the semiconductor. As such, the thermal and mechanical parameters of InAs can be greatly modified by decreasing the size and dimension of the semiconductor as a result of the quantum-confinement effect.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Morelli D T and Slack G A 2006 High thermal conductivity materials (New York: Springer, NP)
2. Omar M and Taha H 2009 Physica B: Condens. Matter 404 520310.1016/j.physb.2009.08.304 ↗
3. Omar M and Taha H 2010 Sadhana 35 17710.1007/s12046-010-0019-8 ↗
4. Estreicher S, Gibbons T and Bebek M 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 11280110.1063/1.4913826 ↗
5. Cahill D G, Braun P V, Chen G, Clarke D R, Fan S H, Goodson K E et al 2014 Appl. Phys. Rev. 1 01130510.1063/1.4832615 ↗
6. Majumdar D, Basu A, Mukherjee G D, Ercolani D, Sorba L and Singha A 2014 Nanotechnology 25 46570410.1088/0957-4484/25/46/465704 ↗
7. Madelung O 2012 Semiconductors: data handbook (New York: Springer, NP)
8. Zhou F, Moore A L, Bolinsson J, Persson A, Froberg L, Pettes M L et al 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 20541610.1103/PhysRevB.83.205416 ↗
9. Migunov V 2009 Master thesis (Universität Duisburg-Essen)
10. Le Guillou G and Albany H 1972 Phys. Rev. B 5 230110.1103/PhysRevB.5.2301 ↗
11. Li W and Mingo N 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 18350510.1063/1.4827419 ↗
12. Qader I N, Abdullah B J and Karim H H 2017 Eurasian J. Sci. Eng. 3 910.23918/eajse.v3i1sip9 ↗
13. Shur M S 1996 Handbook series on semiconductor parameters (Singapore: WorldScientific, NP)
14. Morelli D, Heremans J and Slack G 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 19530410.1103/PhysRevB.66.195304 ↗
15. Callaway J 1959 Phys. Rev. 113 104610.1103/PhysRev.113.1046 ↗
16. Asen-Palmer M, Bartkowski K, Gmelin E and Cardona M 1997 Phys. Rev. B 56 943110.1103/PhysRevB.56.9431 ↗
17. Balandin A and Wang K L 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 154410.1103/PhysRevB.58.1544 ↗
18. Khitun A, Balandin A and Wang K 1999 Superlattice. Microst. 26 18110.1006/spmi.1999.0772 ↗
19. Qader I N and Omar M 2017 Bull. Mater. Sci. 40 59910.1007/s12034-017-1393-1 ↗
20. Hou H, Yang J, Hu F, Zhang S and Yang S 2014 Chalcogenide Lett. 11 121
21. Qader I N, Abdullah B J, Hassan M A and Mahmood P H 2019 Eurasian J. Sci. Eng. 4 55
22. Kazan M, Guisbiers G, Pereira S, Correia M R, Masri P, Bruyant A et al 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 107 08350310.1063/1.3340973 ↗
23. Koh Y K 2010 Heat transport by phonons in crystalline materials and nanostructures (Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois)
24. Mamand S, Omar M and Muhammad A 2012 Mater. Res. Bull. 47 126410.1016/j.materresbull.2011.12.025 ↗
25. Tritt T M 2005 Thermal conductivity: theory, properties, and applications (New York: Springer, NP)
26. Klemens P 1955 Proc. Phys. Soc. A 68 111310.1088/0370-1298/68/12/303 ↗
27. Nabarro F 1951 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 209 27810.1098/rspa.1951.0203 ↗
28. Zou J 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 03432410.1063/1.3463358 ↗
29. Zou J and Balandin A 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 293210.1063/1.1345515 ↗
30. Omar M 2016 Int. J. Thermophys. 37 1110.1007/s10765-015-2026-9 ↗
31. de Laeter J R, Böhlke J K, De Bièvre P et al 2003 Pure Appl. Chem. 75 68310.1351/pac200375060683 ↗
32. De Bievre P and Taylor P 1993 Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 123 14910.1016/0168-1176(93)87009-H ↗
33. Zou J, Kotchetkov D, Balandin A, Florescu D and Pollak F H 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 92 253410.1063/1.1497704 ↗
34. Mamand S and Omar M 2014 Adv. Mater. Res. 832 3310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.832.33 ↗
35. Omar M 2012 Mater. Res. Bull. 47 351810.1016/j.materresbull.2012.06.067 ↗
36. Omar M 2007 Mater. Res. Bull. 42 31910.1016/j.materresbull.2006.05.031 ↗
37. Liang L and Li B 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 15330310.1103/PhysRevB.73.153303 ↗
38. Dash J 1999 Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 173710.1103/RevModPhys.71.1737 ↗
39. Post E 1953 Can. J. Phys. 31 11210.1139/p53-010 ↗
40. Wen Z, Zhao M and Jiang Q 2000 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12 8819
41. Swinkels M Y, van Delft M R, Oliveira D S, Cavalli A, Zardo I, van der Heijden R W et al 2015 Nanotechnology 26 38540110.1088/0957-4484/26/38/385401 ↗