journal article·2021-04

Green synthesis of graphene quantum dots and the dual application of graphene quantum dots-decorated flexible MSM p-type ZnO device as UV photodetector and piezotronic generator

Nazia Fathima, N Pradeep, Jyothi Balakrishnan

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

A novel method to synthesize graphene sheets and graphene quantum dots (GQDs) from agricultural waste is reported in this paper. The as-prepared GQDs were decorated on the antimony (Sb)-doped zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructures to improve the opto-electrical properties of the photodetector. Morphological studies, elemental analysis, absorption and Raman spectroscopy studies were performed on the as-prepared graphene sheets and GQDs. A GQDs-decorated, p-type Sb-doped ZnO metal–semiconductor–metal (MSM) interdigitated UV photodetector was fabricated on a flexible ITO/PET substrate. Structural, morphological and elemental analyses were performed on the GQDs-decorated nanostructures. The Hall measurements show that the device exhibits p-type conductivity with hole concentration of 3 × 1019 cm−3 and Hall mobility of 2067 cm2 V−1 s−1. It is observed from the I–V studies that the Sb-doped ZnO MSM device with GQDs exhibits 103 times higher dark and photocurrents as compared to the device without GQDs decoration. The dynamic response is measured, and the turn-on (τon) and turn-off (τoff) times are found to be 3.67 and 12.26 s, respectively. The device also exhibited piezotronic dark potential on compression at a convex arc angle. Repeated compressions and relaxations were performed on the device and it behaved as a piezotronic generator.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Graphene research and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Koole R, Groeneveld E and Vanmaekelbergh D 2014 Nanoparticles, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44823-610.1007/978-3-662-44823-6 ↗
2. Neto A H C, Guinea F, Peres N M R, Novoselov K S and Geim A K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
3. Shen J, Zhu Y, Yang X, Zong J, Zhang J and Li C 2012 New J. Chem. 36 9710.1039/C1NJ20658C ↗
4. Lee J, Kim K, Park W I, Kim B-H, Park J H, Kim T-H et al 2012 Nano Lett. 12 607810.1021/nl302520m ↗
5. Elvati P, Baumeister E and Violi A 2017 RSC Adv. 7 1770410.1039/C7RA01029J ↗
6. Xie Y, Wei L, Wei G, Li Q, Wang D, Chen Y et al 2013 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8 110.1186/1556-276X-8-188 ↗
7. Fathima N, Pradeep N and Balakrishnan J 2019 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 90 2610.1016/j.mssp.2018.10.002 ↗
8. Kao T-H, Chen J-Y, Chiu C-H, Huang C-W and Wu W-W 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 111909.10.1063/1.4869355 ↗
9. Liu K, Sakurai M and Aono M 2010 Sensors 10 860410.3390/s100908604 ↗
10. Yao J, Zheng Z and Yang G 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 1291510.1021/acsami.6b03691 ↗
11. Somanathan T, Prasad K and Ostrikov K K 2015 Nanomaterials 5 82610.3390/nano5020826 ↗
12. Paola R, Hu A, Compagnini G, Duley W W and Zhou N Y 2014 Nanoscale 6 238110.1039/C3NR05572H ↗
13. Song L, Shi J, Lua J and Lu C 2015 Chem. Sci. 6 484610.1039/C5SC01416F ↗
14. Çiplak Z, Yildiz N and Çalimli A 2015 Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N. 23 36110.1080/1536383X.2014.894025 ↗
15. Wazir A H and Kundi I W 2016 J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 38 11
16. Lai Q, Zhu S, Luo X, Zou M and Huang S 2012 AIP Adv. 2 2
17. Mohajer S, Ara M H M and Serahatjoo L 2016 J. Nanophotonics 10 03601410.1117/1.JNP.10.036014 ↗
18. Chhabra V A, Kaur R, Kumar N, Deep A, Rajesh C and Kim K-H 2018 RSC Adv. 8 1144610.1039/C8RA01148F ↗
19. Hodkiewicz J 2010 Thermo Fisher Scientific 4 1
20. Wu J, Wang P, Wang F and Fang Y 2018 Nanomaterials 8 86410.3390/nano8100864 ↗
21. Dong X, Shi Y, Zhao Y, Chen D, Ye J, Yao Y et al 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 13550110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.135501 ↗
22. Kim D, Kim W, Jeon S and Yong K 2017 RSC Adv. 7 4053910.1039/C7RA07157D ↗
23. Sahoo S, Khurana G, Barik S K, Dussan S, Barrionuevo D and Katiyar R S 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 548510.1021/jp400573w ↗
24. David T, Goldsmith S and Boxman R L 2005 cond-mat. mtrl-sci. 1, http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0502150
25. Yang B, Chen J, Cui L and Liu W 2015 RSC Adv. 5 5920410.1039/C5RA07836A ↗
26. Chen W J, Wu J-K, Lin J-C, Lo S-T, Lin H-D, Hang D-R et al 2013 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8 110.1186/1556-276X-8-1 ↗
27. Boruah B D and Misra A 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 1818210.1021/acsami.6b04954 ↗
28. Chang Y 2010 Dissertation School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
29. Li Y, Hu Y, Zhao Y, Shi G, Deng L, Hou Y et al 2011 Adv. Mater. 23 77610.1002/adma.201003819 ↗
30. Müller A, Konstantinidis G, Dragoman M, Neculoiu D, Dinescu A, Androulidaki M et al 2008 Proc. Int. Semicond. Conf. CAS 1 91
31. Fathima N, Pradeep N and Balakrishnan J 2019 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 194 20710.1016/j.solmat.2019.02.016 ↗
32. Rajan A, Kumar H, Gupta V and Tomar M 2014 Procedia Eng. 94 4410.1016/j.proeng.2013.11.046 ↗
33. Kiruthika S, Singh S and Kulkarni G U 2016 RSC Adv. 6 4466810.1039/C6RA07118J ↗
34. Liu D, Li H-J, Gao J, Zhao S, Zhu Y, Wang P et al 2018 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13 26110.1186/s11671-018-2672-5 ↗
35. Zhang Q, Jie J, Diao S, Shao Z and Zhang Q 2015 ACS Nano 9 156110.1021/acsnano.5b00437 ↗
36. Tetsuka H 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 110.1038/s41598-017-05981-y ↗