Rose bengal-sensitized nanocrystalline ceria photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cell application
Source abstract
Abstract
For efficient charge injection and transportation, wide bandgap nanostructured metal oxide semiconductors with dye adsorption surface and higher electron mobility are essential properties for photoanode in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). TiO2-based DSSCs are well established and so far have demonstrated maximum power conversion efficiency when sensitized with ruthenium-based dyes. Quest for new materials and/or methods is continuous process in scientific investigation, for getting desired comparative results. The conduction band (CB) position of CeO2 photoanode lies below lowest unoccupied molecular orbital level (LUMO) of rose bengal (RB) dye. Due to this, faster electron transfer from LUMO level of RB dye to CB of CeO2 is facilitated. Recombination rate of electrons is less in CeO2 photoanode than that of TiO2 photoanode. Hence, the lifetime of electrons is more in CeO2 photoanode. Therefore, we have replaced TiO2 by ceria (CeO2) and expensive ruthenium-based dye by a low cost RB dye. In this study, we have synthesized CeO2 nanoparticles. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis confirms the formation of CeO2 with particle size ∼7 nm by Scherrer formula. The bandgap of 2.93 eV is calculated using UV–visible absorption data. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images show formation of porous structure of photoanode, which is useful for dye adsorption. The energy dispersive spectroscopy is in confirmation with XRD results, confirming the presence of Ce and O in the ratio of 1:2. UV–visible absorption under diffused reflectance spectra of dye-loaded photoanode confirms the successful dye loading. UV–visible transmission spectrum of CeO2 photoanode confirms the transparency of photoanode in visible region. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis confirms less recombination rate and more electron lifetime in RB-sensitized CeO2 than TiO2 photoanode. We found that CeO2 also showed with considerable difference between dark and light DSSCs performance, when loaded with RB dye. The working mechanism of solar cells with fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)/CeO2/RB dye/carbon-coated FTO is discussed. These solar cells show V OC ∼360 mV, J SC ∼0.25 mA cm −2 and fill factor ∼63% with efficiency of 0.23%. These results are better as compared to costly ruthenium dye-sensitized CeO2 photoanode.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Lewis N S 2007 Science 315 79810.1126/science.1137014 ↗
2. O’Regan B and Grätzel M 1991 Nature 353 73710.1038/353737a0 ↗
3. Gao F, Wang Y, Shi D, Zhang J, Wang M, Jing X, Humphry-Baker R, Wang P, Zakeeruddin S M and Gratzel M 2008 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 1072010.1021/ja801942j ↗
4. Singh R G, Gautam N, Gautam S K, Kumar V, Kapoor A and Singh F 2013 J. Renew. Sust. Energy 5 033134(1–8)
5. Khadtare S S, Jadkar S R and Pathan H M 2012 Int. J. Green Nanotechnol. 4 52810.1080/19430892.2012.737739 ↗
6. Khadtare S S, Ware A P, Gawali S S, Jadkar S R, Pingale S S and Pathan H M 2015 RSC Adv. 5 1764710.1039/C4RA14620D ↗
7. Kumar V, Singh N, Kumar V, Purohit L P, Kapoor A, Ntwaeaborwa O M and Swart H C 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 134506(1–6)
8. Sayama K, Sugihara H and Arakawa H 1998 Chem. Mater. 10 382510.1021/cm980111l ↗
9. Lenzmann F, Krueger J, Burnside S, Brooks K, Gra M, Gal D, Ru S and Cahen D 2001 J. Phys. Chem. B 105 634710.1021/jp010380q ↗
10. Turkovic A and Crnjak Z 1997 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 45 27510.1016/S0927-0248(96)00076-1 ↗
11. Chappel S and Zaban A 2002 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 71 14110.1016/S0927-0248(01)00050-2 ↗
12. Shang G, Wu J, Huang M, Lin J, Lan Z, Huang Y and Fan L 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 2014010.1021/jp304185q ↗
13. Nair S V, Balakrishnan A, Subramanian K R V, Anu A M, Asha A M and Deepika B 2012 Bull. Mater. Sci. 35 48910.1007/s12034-012-0323-5 ↗
14. Cyriac S L, Deepika B, Pillai B, Nair S V and Subramanian K R V 2014 Bull. Mater. Sci. 37 68510.1007/s12034-014-0678-x ↗
15. Sharma Rajkumar G D and Roy M S 2011 Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 49 557
16. Baviskar P, Ennaoui A and Sankapal B R 2014 Solar Energy 105 44510.1016/j.solener.2014.03.024 ↗
17. Sharma G D, Singh S P, Nagarjuna P, Mikroyannidis J A, Ball R J and Kurchania R 2013 J. Renew. Sust. Energy 5 043107 (1–7)
18. Hamann T W, Jensen R A, Martinson A B F, Ryswyk H V and Hupp J T 2008 Energy Environ. Sci. 1 6610.1039/b809672d ↗
19. Mishra A, Fischer M K R and Bauerle P 2009 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 247410.1002/anie.200804709 ↗
20. Sayyed S A A R, Beedri N I, Kadam V S and Pathan H M 2016 Appl. Nanosci. 6 87510.1007/s13204-015-0495-6 ↗
21. Tripathi M and Chawla P 2014 Ionics 21 54110.1007/s11581-014-1172-6 ↗
22. Rai P, Khan R, Ko K J, Lee J H and Yu Y T 2014 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron 25 2872
23. Lira-Cantu M and Krebs F C 2006 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90 207610.1016/j.solmat.2006.02.007 ↗
24. Upadhyay R, Tripathi M, Chawla P and Pandey A 2014 J. Solid State Electrochem. 18 188910.1007/s10008-014-2426-y ↗
25. Hua Y, Yang B, Xu Z, Fengqui T, Max L G Q and Lianzhou W 2012 Chem. Commun. 48 738610.1039/c2cc32239k ↗
26. Roh J, Hwang S H and Jang J 2014 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 1982510.1021/am505194k ↗
27. Elaziouti A, Laouedj N, Bekka A and Vannier R N 2014 Sciences Technologie A 39 9
28. Pradhan B, Batabyal S K and Pal A J 2007 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 91 76910.1016/j.solmat.2007.01.006 ↗
29. Corma A, Atienzar P, Garcia H and Chane-Ching J 2004 Nat. Mater. 3 39410.1038/nmat1129 ↗
30. Fan L, Ma Y, Wang X, Singh M and Zhu B 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 539910.1039/c3ta14098a ↗
31. Shehata N, Clavel M, Meehan K, Samir E, Soha G. and Salah M 2015 Materials 8 766310.3390/ma8115399 ↗
32. Godinho M J, Gonçalves R F, Santos L P S, Varela J A, Longo E and Leite E R 2007 Mater. Lett. 61 190410.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.152 ↗
33. Liu Y H, Zuo J C, Ren X F and Yong L 2014 Metalurgija 53 463
34. Azaroff L V 1968 Elements of X-ray crystallography (New York: McGraw-Hill) p 552
35. Orel Z and Orel B 1994 Phys. Status Solidi B 186 3310.1002/pssb.2221860135 ↗
36. Brus L E 1984 J. Chem. Phys. 80 440310.1063/1.447218 ↗
37. Bueno R M, Martinez-Duart J M, Hernandez-Velez M and Vazquez L 1997 J. Mater. Sci. 32 186110.1023/A:1018509007844 ↗
38. Patsalas P, Logothetidis S, Sygellou L and Kennou S 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 035104(1–13)10.1103/PhysRevB.68.035104 ↗
39. Arote S, Ingle R, Tabhane V and Pathan H 2014 J. Renew. Sust. Energy 6 013132(1–9)10.1063/1.4863692 ↗
40. Singh S P, Roy M S, Thomas K R J, Balaiah S, Bhanuprakash K and Sharma G D 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 594110.1021/jp210971u ↗
41. Liu G, Rodriguez J A, Hrbek J, Dvorak J and Peden C H F 2001 J. Phys. Chem. B 105 776210.1021/jp011224m ↗