journal article·2023

Dual stimuli-responsive cross-linked nanoassemblies from an amphiphilic mannose-6-phosphate based tri-block copolymer for lysosomal membrane permeabilization

Basudeb Mondal, Abinash Padhy, Saptarshi Maji, Arnab Gupta, Sayam Sen Gupta

Biomaterials Science· Volume 11· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Stimuli-responsive cross-linked nanocarriers that can induce lysosomal cell death (LCD) via lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) represent a new class of delivery platforms and have attracted the attention of researchers in the biomedical field. The advantages of such cross-linked nanocarriers are as follows (i) they remain intact during blood circulation; and (ii) they reach the target site via specific receptor-mediated endocytosis leading to the enhancement of therapeutic efficacy and reduction of side effects. Herein, we have synthesized a mannose-6-phosphate (M6P) based amphiphilic ABC type tri-block copolymer having two chains of FDA-approved poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) as the hydrophobic block, and poly(S-(o-nitrobenzyl)-L-cysteine) (NBC) acts as the photoresponsive crosslinker block. Two different tri-block copolymers, [(PCL35)2-b-NBC20-b-M6PGP20] and [(PCL35)2-b-NBC15-b-M6PGP20], were synthesized which upon successful self-assembly initially formed spherical uncross-linked "micellar-type" aggregates (UCL-M) and vesicles (UCL-V), respectively. The uncross-linked nanocarriers upon UV treatment for thirty minutes were covalently crosslinked in the middle PNBC block giving rise to the di-sulfide bonds and forming interface cross-linked "micellar-type" aggregates (ICL-M) and vesicles (ICL-V). DLS, TEM, and AFM techniques were used to successfully characterize the morphology of these nanocarriers. The dual stimuli (redox and enzyme) responsiveness of the cross-linked nanocarriers and their trafficking to the lysosome in mammalian cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis was probed using confocal microscopy images. Furthermore, the addition of a chloroquine (CQ, a known lysosomotropic agent) encapsulated cross-linked nanocarrier (CQ@ICL-V) to non-cancerous (HEK-293T) cells and liver (HepG2), and breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) was found to initiate lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) followed by lysosomal destabilization which eventually led to lysosomal cell death (LCD). Due to the targeted delivery of CQ to the lysosomes of cancerous cells, almost a 90% smaller amount of CQ was able to achieve similar cell death to CQ alone.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Department of Chemical Sciences, Mohanpur Campus, Nadia-741246, India

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Department of Biological Sciences, Mohanpur Campus, Nadia-741246, India

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Aits · J. Cell Sci. · 2013 · 126 · 190510.1242/jcs.091181 ↗
2. Guicciardi · Oncogene · 2004 · 23 · 288110.1038/sj.onc.1207512 ↗
3. Kroemer · Nat. Rev. Cancer · 2005 · 5 · 88610.1038/nrc1738 ↗
4. Shintani · Science · 2004 · 306 · 99010.1126/science.1099993 ↗
5. Foghsgaard · J. Cell Biol. · 2001 · 153 · 99910.1083/jcb.153.5.999 ↗
6. Brunk · Redox Rep. · 2001 · 6 · 9110.1179/135100001101536094 ↗
7. Boya · J. Exp. Med. · 2003 · 197 · 132310.1084/jem.20021952 ↗
8. Yuan · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2002 · 99 · 628610.1073/pnas.092135599 ↗
9. Fehrenbacher · Cancer Res. · 2004 · 64 · 530110.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1427 ↗
10. Liu · EMBO J. · 2003 · 22 · 531310.1093/emboj/cdg510 ↗
11. Jäättelä · Nat. Immunol. · 2003 · 4 · 41610.1038/ni0503-416 ↗
12. Wiegmann · Cell · 1994 · 78 · 100510.1016/0092-8674(94)90275-5 ↗
13. Werneburg · Am. J. Physiol.: Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. · 2002 · 283 · G947
14. Høyer-Hansen · Cell Death Differ. · 2005 · 12 · 129710.1038/sj.cdd.4401651 ↗
15. Kornfeld · Annu. Rev. Biochem. · 1992 · 61 · 30710.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.001515 ↗
16. Ghosh · Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. · 2003 · 4 · 20210.1038/nrm1050 ↗
17. De Souza · Nat. Genet. · 1995 · 11 · 44710.1038/ng1295-447 ↗
18. Tiels · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2012 · 30 · 122510.1038/nbt.2427 ↗
19. Vaillant · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2015 · 54 · 595210.1002/anie.201500286 ↗
20. Gary-Bobo · Curr. Med. Chem. · 2007 · 14 · 294510.2174/092986707782794005 ↗
21. Petersen · Cancer Cell · 2013 · 24 · 37910.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.003 ↗
22. Das · ACS Macro Lett. · 2016 · 5 · 80910.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00297 ↗
23. Mondal · Biomater. Sci. · 2020 · 8 · 632210.1039/D0BM01469A ↗
24. Mondal · Chem. Commun. · 2021 · 57 · 10910.1039/D0CC06169G ↗
25. Banik · Nature · 2020 · 584 · 29110.1038/s41586-020-2545-9 ↗
26. Ahn · Cell Chem. Biol. · 2021 · 28 · 107210.1016/j.chembiol.2021.02.024 ↗
27. Zhou · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2021 · 7 · 49910.1021/acscentsci.1c00146 ↗
28. Pati · Biomacromolecules · 2016 · 17 · 46610.1021/acs.biomac.5b01354 ↗
29. Ma · Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 461510.1038/s41467-020-18399-4 ↗
30. Zhong · Biomacromolecules · 2014 · 15 · 195510.1021/bm5003009 ↗
31. Zhang · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2018 · 57 · 706610.1002/anie.201801984 ↗
32. Hao · Adv. Sci. · 2020 · 7 · 200185310.1002/advs.202001853 ↗
33. Palanikumar · Commun. Biol. · 2020 · 3 · 9510.1038/s42003-020-0817-4 ↗
34. Praveen · ACS Appl. Bio Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 416210.1021/acsabm.9b00432 ↗
35. Deng · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2020 · 160 · 19910.1016/j.addr.2020.10.019 ↗
36. Joralemon · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 1689210.1021/ja053919x ↗
37. Gudipati · J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. · 2004 · 42 · 619310.1002/pola.20466 ↗
38. Ma · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2002 · 99 · 505810.1073/pnas.052653099 ↗
39. Talelli · Nano Today · 2015 · 10 · 9310.1016/j.nantod.2015.01.005 ↗
40. van Nostrum · Soft Matter · 2011 · 7 · 324610.1039/c0sm00999g ↗
41. Kim · Biomacromolecules · 2012 · 13 · 81410.1021/bm201730p ↗
42. Lu · Nano Res. · 2018 · 11 · 498510.1007/s12274-018-2152-3 ↗
43. Xu · J. Microencapsulation · 2006 · 7 · 659
44. Li · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2014 · 66 · 5810.1016/j.addr.2013.09.008 ↗
45. Wei · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2020 · 6 · 40410.1021/acscentsci.9b01174 ↗
46. Gardey · Biomacromolecules · 2020 · 21 · 139310.1021/acs.biomac.9b01656 ↗
47. Ryu · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1722710.1021/ja1069932 ↗
48. Cerritelli · Biomacromolecules · 2007 · 8 · 196610.1021/bm070085x ↗
49. Moon · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 24310.1038/nmat2960 ↗
50. Zhang · Langmuir · 2019 · 35 · 667610.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00405 ↗
51. Zheng · Biomacromolecules · 2018 · 19 · 387410.1021/acs.biomac.8b01001 ↗
52. Sun · Polym. Chem. · 2018 · 9 · 328710.1039/C8PY00606G ↗
53. Qin · Mol. Pharm. · 2019 · 16 · 371110.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00691 ↗
54. Liu · Biomacromolecules · 2012 · 13 · 157310.1021/bm300304t ↗
55. Pandey · Bioconjugate Chem. · 2019 · 30 · 63310.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00831 ↗
56. Schneider · Nat. Methods · 2012 · 9 · 67110.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
57. H.Wickham , Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis , Springer , 200910.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 ↗