journal article·2022

Cytocompatible, soft and thick brush-modified scaffolds with prolonged antibacterial effect to mitigate wound infections

Shaifali Dhingra, Vidit Gaur, Varsha Saini, Kajal Rana, Jayanta Bhattacharya, Thomas Loho, Sudip Ray, Avinash Bajaj, Sampa Saha

Biomaterials Science· Volume 10· Issue 14
This record is marked as retracted by the source. Review the publisher’s notice before using its findings.
Publisher page

Abstract

Biomedical device or implant-associated infections caused by pathogenic bacteria are a major clinical issue, and their prevention and/or treatment remains a challenging task. Infection-resistant antimicrobial coatings with impressive cytocompatibility offer a step towards addressing this problem. Herein, we report a new strategy for constructing highly antibacterial as well as cytocompatible mixed polymer brushes onto the surface of 3D printed scaffold made of biodegradable tartaric acid-based aliphatic polyester blends. The mixed brushes were nothing but a combination of poly(3-dimethyl-(methacryloyloxyethyl) ammonium propane sulfonate) (polyDMAPS) and poly((oligo ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate) (polyPEGMA) with varying chain length (n) of the ethylene glycol unit (n = 1, 6, 11, and 21). Both homo and copolymeric brushes of polyDMAPS with polyPEGMA exhibited antibacterial efficacy against both Gram positive and Gram negative pathogens such as E. coli (Escherichia coli) and S. aureus (Staphylococcus aureus) because of the combined action of bacteriostatic effects originating from strongly hydrated layers present in zwitterionic (polyDMAPS) and hydrophilic (polyPEGMA) copolymer brushes. Interestingly, a mixed polymer brush comprising polyDMAPS and polyPEGMA (ethylene glycol chain unit of 21) at 50/50 ratio provided zero bacterial growth and almost 100% cytocompatibility (tested using L929 mouse fibroblast cells), making the brush-modified biodegradable substrate an excellent choice for an infection-resistant and cytocompatible surface. An attempt was made to understand their extraordinary performance with the help of contact angle, surface charge analysis and nanoindentation study, which revealed the formation of a hydrophilic, almost neutral, very soft surface (99.99% reduction in hardness and modulus) after modification with the mixed brushes. This may completely suppress bacterial adhesion. Animal studies demonstrated that these brush-modified scaffolds are biocompatible and can mitigate wound infections. Overall, this study shows that the fascinating combination of an infection-resistant and cytocompatible surface can be generated on biodegradable polymeric surfaces by modulating the surface hardness, flexibility and hydrophilicity by selecting appropriate functionality of the copolymeric brushes grafted onto them, making them ideal non-leaching, anti-infective, hemocompatible and cytocompatible coatings for biodegradable implants.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial agents and applications · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India

Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India

Laboratory of Nanotechnology and Chemical Biology, Regional Centre For Biotechnology, India

Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, The University of Auckland, New Zealand Institute for Minerals to Materials Research, India

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Indian Council of Medical Research · Science and Engineering Research Board

References (88)

Show source-provided references
1. Singh · Environ. Chem. Lett. · 2021 · 1
2. Tournas · Crit. Rev. Microbiol. · 2005 · 31 · 3310.1080/10408410590886024 ↗
3. Nikaido · Annu. Rev. Biochem. · 2009 · 78 · 11910.1146/annurev.biochem.78.082907.145923 ↗
4. Wang · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2017 · 12 · 11110.2147/IJN.S107472 ↗
5. Wang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 413610.1021/am4000547 ↗
6. Neoh · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 281310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.018 ↗
7. Verma · Iran. Polym. J. · 2019 · 28 · 49310.1007/s13726-019-00717-3 ↗
8. Marcuzzo · APMIS · 2017 · 125 · 76310.1111/apm.12728 ↗
9. Vasilev · Expert Rev. Med. Devices · 2009 · 6 · 55310.1586/erd.09.36 ↗
10. Li · Chem. Eng. J. · 2021 · 423 · 13013310.1016/j.cej.2021.130133 ↗
11. Yu · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 2859110.1021/acsami.5b10074 ↗
12. Nejadnik · J. Antimicrob. Chemother. · 2008 · 62 · 132310.1093/jac/dkn395 ↗
13. Dhingra · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2021 · 118 · 11146510.1016/j.msec.2020.111465 ↗
14. Mas-Moruno · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2019 · 8 · 180110310.1002/adhm.201801103 ↗
15. Murata · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 487010.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.012 ↗
16. R.Tan , J.Yoo and Y.Jang , Engineering Approaches to Create Antibacterial Surfaces on Biomedical Implants and Devices , in Racing for the Surface , 2020 , pp. 313–34010.1007/978-3-030-34475-7_14 ↗
17. Samanta · Soft Matter · 2021 · 17 · 701410.1039/D1SM00690H ↗
18. Gao · Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 389910.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.013 ↗
19. Klein Gunnewiek · Langmuir · 2013 · 29 · 1384310.1021/la403360r ↗
20. Bazaka · Biotechnol. J. · 2011 · 6 · 110310.1002/biot.201100027 ↗
21. Kolewe · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 11 · 32010.1021/acsami.8b18302 ↗
22. Kolewe · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 1956210.1021/acsami.5b04269 ↗
23. Hadjesfandiari · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2014 · 2 · 496810.1039/C4TB00550C ↗
24. Nejadnik · Biomaterials · 2008 · 29 · 411710.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.014 ↗
25. M. C.Lensen , V. A.Schulte and M.Diez , Cell Adhesion and spreading on an intrinsically anti-adhesive PEG biomaterial , in Biomaterials—Physics and Chemistry , ed. P.R. Pignatello , INTECH Open Access Publisher , Rijeka, Croatia , 2011 , pp. 397–414
26. Manecka · ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. · 2014 · 2 · 99610.1021/sc400564r ↗
27. Woo · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 262210.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.004 ↗
28. Xing · Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 366910.1002/adma.201600284 ↗
29. Dhamaniya · Polymer · 2010 · 51 · 539210.1016/j.polymer.2010.09.034 ↗
30. P.Larkin , Generaloutline and strategiesfor IR and Raman spectral interpretation , in Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy , Elsevier, Watham, MA, USA, 2011 , pp. 117–13310.1016/B978-0-12-386984-5.10007-2 ↗
31. Li · ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. · 2018 · 6 · 204710.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03464 ↗
32. Kizhakkedathu · Polymer · 2004 · 45 · 747110.1016/j.polymer.2004.08.049 ↗
33. Xing · Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 366910.1002/adma.201600284 ↗
34. Jiang · Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 1157510.1021/la202101q ↗
35. Leng · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 1688110.1021/acsami.5b05627 ↗
36. Iruthayaraj · Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 107010.1021/la104125n ↗
37. Zeng · Macromol. Rapid Commun. · 2019 · 4010.1002/marc.201900078 ↗
38. He · Biomater. Sci. · 2019 · 7 · 536910.1039/C9BM01275C ↗
39. Chu · Polym. Chem. · 2017 · 8 · 230910.1039/C7PY00045F ↗
40. Xu · Macromolecules · 2011 · 44 · 237110.1021/ma200160h ↗
41. Sánchez-Morán · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 2669410.1021/acsami.1c02443 ↗
42. Al-Ani · Polymers · 2017 · 9 · 34310.3390/polym9080343 ↗
43. Morimoto · Biomacromolecules · 2016 · 17 · 152310.1021/acs.biomac.6b00172 ↗
44. Yin · Desalination · 2015 · 365 · 4610.1016/j.desal.2015.02.017 ↗
45. Saha · Macromolecules · 2012 · 45 · 906310.1021/ma301556v ↗
46. Dokukin · Macromolecules · 2017 · 50 · 27510.1021/acs.macromol.6b02149 ↗
47. Kutnyanszky · Eur. Polym. J. · 2012 · 48 · 810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.09.008 ↗
48. Zhang · Biomacromolecules · 2019 · 20 · 417110.1021/acs.biomac.9b01060 ↗
49. Sui · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 498110.1039/b924392e ↗
50. Wang · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 81710.1021/la052741p ↗
51. Fu · Prog. Org. Coat. · 2019 · 130 · 7510.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.01.038 ↗
52. Zhang · Polym. Chem. · 2013 · 4 · 108410.1039/C2PY20755A ↗
53. Li · Langmuir · 2012 · 28 · 1640810.1021/la303438t ↗
54. Wu · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 810
55. Sun · Colloids Surf., B · 2014 · 122 · 13410.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.06.041 ↗
56. Guo · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2015 · 452 · 4310.1016/j.jcis.2015.04.013 ↗
57. Guo · Text. Res. J. · 2009 · 79 · 137110.1177/0040517509103950 ↗
58. Zhao · J. Appl. Microbiol. · 2008 · 104 · 82410.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03616.x ↗
59. Oh · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 2931210.1021/acsami.9b09885 ↗
60. Zhang · Biomater. Sci. · 2020 · 8 · 99710.1039/C9BM01666J ↗
61. Tang · Prog. Org. Coat. · 2016 · 97 · 27710.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.04.038 ↗
62. Kurowska · Biomacromolecules · 2017 · 18 · 137310.1021/acs.biomac.7b00100 ↗
63. Tuson · Soft Matter · 2013 · 9 · 436810.1039/c3sm27705d ↗
64. Lin · Langmuir · 2013 · 29 · 1018310.1021/la401336y ↗
65. Mi · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 53 · 174610.1002/anie.201304060 ↗
66. Chen · Langmuir · 2016 · 32 · 331510.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00386 ↗
67. Rodriguez-Emmenegger · Macromol. Rapid Commun. · 2011 · 32 · 95210.1002/marc.201100189 ↗
68. Sin · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 86110.1021/am4041256 ↗
69. Chen · Eur. Polym. J. · 2011 · 47 · 51110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.10.007 ↗
70. Feng · Macromolecules · 2021 · 54 · 571910.1021/acs.macromol.1c00430 ↗
71. Banerjee · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 69010.1002/adma.201001215 ↗
72. Hucknall · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 244110.1002/adma.200900383 ↗
73. Brzozowska · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 1750810.1021/acsami.6b14262 ↗
74. Morgese · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 4183910.1021/acsami.8b17193 ↗
75. Espinosa-Marzal · Soft Matter · 2013 · 9 · 1057210.1039/c3sm51415c ↗
76. Bakhti · Appl. Nanosci. · 2020 · 10 · 213910.1007/s13204-020-01338-6 ↗
77. Deuschle · J. Mater. Res. · 2007 · 22 · 310710.1557/JMR.2007.0394 ↗
78. Ostaci · Polym. Chem. · 2011 · 2 · 34810.1039/C0PY00251H ↗
79. Sautrot-Ba · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2019 · 7 · 652610.1039/C9TB01170F ↗
80. Wu · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2018 · 455 · 98710.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.056 ↗
81. Tranchida · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2011 · 13 · B36910.1002/adem.201080129 ↗
82. Wu · Biomaterials · 2021 · 273 · 12079410.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120794 ↗
83. Chen · Science · 2009 · 323 · 169810.1126/science.1169399 ↗
84. Dehghani · Langmuir · 2016 · 32 · 1031710.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02958 ↗
85. Liu · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2014 · 2 · 722210.1039/C4TB01151A ↗
86. Changotade · Stem Cells Int. · 2015 · 2015 · 28379610.1155/2015/283796 ↗
87. Gisby · Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · 2000 · 44 · 25510.1128/AAC.44.2.255-260.2000 ↗
88. P.Rajesh , S.Verma , V.Verma , K.Balani , A.Agarwal and R.Narayan , Biosurfaces: A Materials Science and Engineering Perspective , in Host response of implanted biomaterials , 2015 , pp. 106–125