journal article·2022

Preliminary in vivo study of biodegradable PLA–PEU–PLA anti-adhesion membranes in a rat Achilles tendon model of peritendinous adhesions

Zebiri Hadda, Van Den Berghe Hélène, Paunet Tom, Wolf-Mandroux Aurélie, Bethry Audrey, Taillades Hubert, Yohan Jean Noël, Nelly Pirot, Botteron Catherine, Chammas Michel, Chammas Pierre-Emmanuel, Garric Xavier

Biomaterials Science· Volume 10· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Peritendinous adhesions are complications known to occur up to 6 weeks after surgery and cause chronic pain and disability. Anti-adhesion barriers are currently the best option for prevention. In a previous study, we designed two biodegradable membranes, D-PACO1 and D-PACO2, based on new triblock copolymers and conducted in vitro evaluations. The membranes maintained filmogenic integrity, had degradation rates that promoted anti-adhesion and were biocompatible, suggesting their safe and effective use as anti-adhesion devices. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a preliminary in vivo study in a rat model of peritendinous adhesions and evaluated the membranes' degradation rates, tendon healing and anti-adhesion effect compared to non-surgical and surgical control groups 2 and 10 weeks after surgery. Macroscopic evaluation showed membranes were effective in reducing the extent and severity of adhesions. Membranes acted as physical barriers at 2 weeks and underwent a complete or significant biodegradation at 10 weeks. D-PACO2 had a longer degradation rate compared to D-PACO1, was more effective in reducing adhesions and is expected to be more effective in promoting tendon healing. The tendency of D-PACO1 to promote tendon healing while D-PACO2 did not interfere with healing highlights the need to redesign the porosity of the D-PACO membranes for optimal nutrient diffusion, while maintaining their anti-adhesion effect and clinical usability. Preliminary findings revealed that adhesions form beyond the 6 weeks cited in the literature. In this study, adhesion formation continued for up to 10 weeks, underlining the need to increase the experimental period and sample size of future experiments evaluating anti-adhesion membranes.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tendon Structure and Treatment · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Sports injuries and prevention

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (IBMM), UMR 5247, CNRS, Université Montpellier, ENSCM, Faculté de Pharmacie, Bâtiment I, 15 avenue Charles Flahault, BP14491, 34093 Montpellier cedex 5, France

Chirurgie de la main et du membre supérieur, Chirurgie des nerfs périphériques, Hôpital Lapeyronie, CHRU Montpellier, 371, avenue du Doyen Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France

Plateau de simulation, Faculté de Médecine, Université Montpellier, 641 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

Réseau d'Histologie Expérimentale de Montpellier (RHEM), IRCM, INSERM, U1194, Université de Montpellier, Campus Val d'Aurelle, 34298 Montpellier Cedex 5, France

Sirius Pathology, SIRIUS PATHOLOGY, 1705 RTE DU SALEVE, 74350 Cruseilles, Auvergne rhône alpes, France

Funding

Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Titan · Plast. Reconstr. Surg. · 2019 · 144 · 639e10.1097/PRS.0000000000006048 ↗
2. Clayton · Injury · 2008 · 39 · 133810.1016/j.injury.2008.06.021 ↗
3. Docheva · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2015 · 84 · 22210.1016/j.addr.2014.11.015 ↗
4. de Jong · Clin. Orthop. Surg. · 2014 · 6 · 19610.4055/cios.2014.6.2.196 ↗
5. Nichols · Transl. Res. · 2019 · 209 · 15610.1016/j.trsl.2019.02.002 ↗
6. Liu · Tissue Eng., Part B · 2011 · 17 · 16510.1089/ten.teb.2010.0662 ↗
7. Legrand · J. Hand Surg. · 2017 · 42 · 72210.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.013 ↗
8. Wang · J. Biomech. · 2006 · 39 · 156310.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.011 ↗
9. Chen · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 497110.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.030 ↗
10. Chen · Acta Biomater. · 2018 · 73 · 37710.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.027 ↗
11. Hsu · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2018 · 13 · 548510.2147/IJN.S169825 ↗
12. Park · Artif. Organs · 2020 · 44 · E13610.1111/aor.13591 ↗
13. Chen · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2019 · 20 · 503810.3390/ijms20205038 ↗
14. Liao · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2018 · 106 · 260510.1002/jbm.b.34077 ↗
15. Duci · Eur. J. Plast. Surg. · 2017 · 40 · 39310.1007/s00238-017-1307-x ↗
16. von Kieseritzky · J. Hand Surg. Global Online · 2020 · 2 · 10910.1016/j.jhsg.2019.11.003 ↗
17. Leprince · Commun. Biol. · 2019 · 2 · 19610.1038/s42003-019-0447-x ↗
18. Zebiri · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2021 · 9 · 83210.1039/D0TB02545C ↗
19. Huan · Chin. Med. J. · 2013 · 126 · 72910.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20122566 ↗
20. Hadi · Med. J. Indones. · 2014 · 23 · 6510.13181/mji.v23i2.932 ↗
21. Yurdakul Sıkar · Ulusal Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. · 2019 · 25 · 93
22. Liu · J. Orthop. Res. · 2008 · 26 · 56210.1002/jor.20499 ↗
23. Liu · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 469010.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.026 ↗
24. Tang · J. Hand Surg. · 1996 · 21 · 90010.1016/S0363-5023(96)80212-7 ↗
25. Tang · J. Hand Surg. · 1994 · 19 · 6110.1016/0363-5023(94)90225-9 ↗
26. Koc · Hand Surg. Rehabil. · 2019 · 38 · 32310.1016/j.hansur.2019.07.003 ↗
27. Ishiyama · Biomaterials · 2010 · 31 · 400910.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.100 ↗
28. Wang · Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. · 2020 · 8 · 38710.3389/fbioe.2020.00387 ↗
29. da Silva · Polym. Degrad. Stab. · 2010 · 95 · 49110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.001 ↗
30. Hafeman · Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 41910.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.108 ↗