Silk degumming time controls horseradish peroxidase-catalyzed hydrogel properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrogels provide promising applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, with silk fibroin (SF) offering biocompatibility, biodegradability and tunable mechanical properties. The molecular weight (MW) distribution of SF chains varies from ∼80 to 400 kDa depending on the extraction and purification process utilized to prepare the protein polymer. Here, we report a fundamental study on the effect of different silk degumming (extraction) time (DT) on biomaterial properties of enzymatically crosslinked hydrogels, including secondary structure, mechanical stiffness, in vitro degradation, swelling/contraction, optical transparency and cell behaviour. The results indicate that DT plays a crucial role in determining material properties of the hydrogel; decrease in DT increases β-sheet (crystal) formation and mechanical stiffness while decreasing degradation rate and optical transparency. The findings on the relationships between properties of silk hydrogels and DT should facilitate the more rational design of silk-based hydrogel biomaterials to match properties needed for diverse purpose in biomedical engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Biochemical and Structural Characterization · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Tufts University
Medford
USA
Funding
National Institutes of Health · Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. Li · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2016 · 1 · 1
2. Peppas · Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1997 · 2 · 53110.1016/S1359-0294(97)80103-3 ↗
3. Hasturk · Acta Biomater. · 2019 · 95 · 310.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.040 ↗
4. Drury · Biomaterials · 2003 · 24 · 433710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5 ↗
5. Van Vlierberghe · Biomacromolecules · 2011 · 12 · 138710.1021/bm200083n ↗
6. Annabi · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 8510.1002/adma.201303233 ↗
7. Slaughter · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 330710.1002/adma.200802106 ↗
8. Klouda · Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. · 2008 · 68 · 3410.1016/j.ejpb.2007.02.025 ↗
9. Hoffman · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2012 · 64 · 1810.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010 ↗
10. Highley · Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. · 2016 · 40 · 3510.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.008 ↗
11. Augst · Macromol. Biosci. · 2006 · 6 · 62310.1002/mabi.200600069 ↗
12. Mithieux · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 492110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.055 ↗
13. Bae · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2013 · 1 · 537110.1039/c3tb20940g ↗
14. Peppas · Adv. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 134510.1002/adma.200501612 ↗
15. Floren · J. Funct. Biomater. · 2016 · 7 · 2610.3390/jfb7030026 ↗
16. Guo · Biomacromolecules · 2020 · 21 · 167810.1021/acs.biomac.0c00090 ↗
17. Kapoor · Acta Biomater. · 2016 · 31 · 1710.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.034 ↗
18. Sahoo · Biomacromolecules · 2008 · 9 · 108810.1021/bm800051m ↗
19. Vepari · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2007 · 32 · 99110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.013 ↗
20. Altman · Biomaterials · 2003 · 24 · 40110.1016/S0142-9612(02)00353-8 ↗
21. Cao · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2009 · 10 · 151410.3390/ijms10041514 ↗
22. Kundu · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2014 · 39 · 25110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.09.002 ↗
23. Yucel · Biophys. J. · 2009 · 97 · 204410.1016/j.bpj.2009.07.028 ↗
24. Wang · Biomaterials · 2008 · 29 · 105410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.003 ↗
25. Hu · Biomacromolecules · 2010 · 11 · 317810.1021/bm1010504 ↗
26. Wu · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 1711810.1021/acsami.6b04424 ↗
27. Kim · Biomacromolecules · 2004 · 5 · 78610.1021/bm0345460 ↗
28. Kim · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2016 · 11 · 2967
29. Partlow · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 461510.1002/adfm.201400526 ↗
30. McGill · Acta Biomater. · 2017 · 63 · 7610.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.020 ↗
31. Rodríguez-López · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2001 · 123 · 1183810.1021/ja011853+ ↗
32. Partlow · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2016 · 2 · 210810.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00454 ↗
33. Raia · Biomaterials · 2020 · 233 · 11972910.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119729 ↗
34. Raia · Biomaterials · 2017 · 131 · 5810.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.046 ↗
35. Hasturk · Biomaterials · 2020 · 232 · 11972010.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119720 ↗
36. Browne · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2020 · 6 · 113510.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01419 ↗
37. Noh · Biomed. Mater. · 2006 · 1 · 11610.1088/1748-6041/1/3/004 ↗
38. Zhang · J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. · 2002 · 17 · 6510.1106/088391102023198 ↗
39. Kong · Biomacromolecules · 2004 · 5 · 172010.1021/bm049879r ↗
40. Tabatabai · Langmuir · 2018 · 34 · 1538310.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02950 ↗
41. Zhou · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2008 · 73 · 26510.1016/j.carbpol.2007.11.026 ↗
42. Park · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2018 · 106 · 116610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.115 ↗
43. Kim · Polymer · 2016 · 90 · 2610.1016/j.polymer.2016.02.054 ↗
44. Khanmohammadi · Biomater. Sci. · 2018 · 6 · 128610.1039/C8BM00056E ↗
45. Rockwood · Nat. Protoc. · 2011 · 6 · 161210.1038/nprot.2011.379 ↗
46. Partlow · Macromol. Biosci. · 2016 · 16 · 66610.1002/mabi.201500370 ↗
47. Wray · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B · 2011 · 99 · 8910.1002/jbm.b.31875 ↗
48. Gulrajani · Rev. Prog. Color. Relat. Top. · 1992 · 22 · 7910.1111/j.1478-4408.1992.tb00091.x ↗
49. Ki · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2007 · 41 · 34610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2007.05.005 ↗
50. Lee · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2016 · 89 · 27310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.073 ↗
51. Wang · Adv. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 175 · 15810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.175-176.158 ↗
52. Stoppel · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2016 · 104 · 305810.1002/jbm.a.35850 ↗
53. Hu · Macromolecules · 2006 · 39 · 616110.1021/ma0610109 ↗
54. Cho · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2012 · 51 · 33610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.06.007 ↗
55. McGill · Acta Biomater. · 2017 · 63 · 7610.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.020 ↗
56. Bailey · Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B · 2002 · 357 · 12110.1098/rstb.2001.1041 ↗
57. Fu · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 2018 · 56 · 133610.1002/polb.24728 ↗
58. Li · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2019 · 1
59. Qiu · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2001 · 53 · 32110.1016/S0169-409X(01)00203-4 ↗
60. Chirila · Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. · 2017 · 64 · 77110.1002/bab.1552 ↗
61. Trabbic-Carlson · Biomacromolecules · 2003 · 4 · 57210.1021/bm025671z ↗
62. Gunasekaran · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2006 · 102 · 466510.1002/app.24825 ↗
63. Elyashevich · Polym. Sci., Ser. A · 2009 · 51 · 55010.1134/S0965545X09050095 ↗
64. Zhou · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 1693710.1021/jp050883m ↗
65. Kim · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 277510.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.044 ↗
66. Ruan · J. Mol. Struct. · 2008 · 883 · 8510.1016/j.molstruc.2007.11.055 ↗
67. Gil · Biomaterials · 2010 · 31 · 895310.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.017 ↗
68. Matsumoto · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 2163010.1021/jp056350v ↗
69. Akkara · J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. · 1991 · 29 · 156110.1002/pola.1991.080291105 ↗
70. Heichel · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2019 · 5 · 324610.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00786 ↗
71. Freddi · J. Biotechnol. · 2006 · 125 · 28110.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.03.003 ↗
72. Choi · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2019 · 8 · 190064410.1002/adhm.201900644 ↗
73. Mijangos · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 40 · 553810.1021/es060866q ↗
74. Wang · J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. · 2012 · 23 · 179310.1163/156856211X598193 ↗
75. Hadjipanayi · J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. · 2009 · 3 · 7710.1002/term.136 ↗
76. El-Mohri · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2017 · 74 · 14610.1016/j.msec.2017.02.001 ↗
77. Tsubouchi · Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. · 2005 · 69 · 40310.1271/bbb.69.403 ↗
78. Chirila · Prog. Biomater. · 2013 · 2 · 1410.1186/2194-0517-2-14 ↗
79. Lamboni · Biotechnol. Adv. · 2015 · 33 · 185510.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.10.014 ↗
80. Roach · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 816810.1021/ja042898o ↗
81. Hasturk · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2016 · 5 · 297210.1002/adhm.201600857 ↗
82. Hasturk · Colloids Surf., B · 2019 · 178 · 4410.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.02.037 ↗
83. Arima · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 307410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.013 ↗