journal article·2019Open access

Angiogenesis-promoted bone repair with silicate-shelled hydrogel fiber scaffolds

Khandmaa Dashnyam, Jennifer O. Buitrago, Tsendmaa Bold, Nandin Mandakhbayar, Roman A. Perez, Jonathan C. Knowles, Jung-Hwan Lee, Hae-Won Kim

Biomaterials Science· Volume 7· Issue 12

Abstract

Promoting angiogenesis is a key strategy for stimulating the repair of damaged tissues, including bone. Among other proangiogenic factors, ions have recently been considered a potent element that can be incorporated into biomaterials and then released at therapeutic doses. Silicate-based biomaterials have been reported to induce neovascularization through vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway, potentiating acceleration of bone regeneration. Here, we designed a silicate-shelled hydrogel fiber scaffold with a hard/soft layered structure to investigate the possibility of silicate coating on biopolymer for enhancing biological properties. An alginate hydrogel was injected to form a fiber scaffold with shape-tunability that was then coated with a thin silicate layer with various sol-gel compositions. The silicate/alginate scaffold could release calcium and silicate ions, and in particular, silicate ion release was highly sustainable for over one week at therapeutically relevant levels. The ionic release was highly effective in stimulating the mRNA expression of angiogenic markers (VEGF, KDR, eNOS, bFGF, and HIF1-α) in endothelial cells (HUVECs). Moreover, the in vitro tubular networking of cells was significantly enhanced (1.5 times). In vivo implantation in subcutaneous tissue revealed more pronounced blood vessel formation around the silicate-shelled scaffolds than around silicate-free scaffolds. The presence of a silicate shell was also shown to accelerate acellular mineral (hydroxyapatite) formation. The cellular osteogenesis potential of the silicate/alginate scaffold was further proven by the enhanced expression of osteogenic genes (Col1a1, ALP and OCN). When implanted in a rat calvarium defect, the silicate-shelled scaffold demonstrated significantly improved bone formation (2-3 times higher in bone volume and density) with a concurrent sign of proangiogenesis. This work highlights that the surface-layering of silicate composition is an effective approach for improving the bone regeneration capacity of polymeric hydrogel scaffolds by stimulating ion-induced angiogenesis and providing bone bioactivity to the surface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea

Department of Nanobiomedical Science & BK21 PLUS Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea

UIC Regenerative Medicine Research Institute, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

UCL Eastman-Korea Dental Medicine Innovation Centre, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea

Division of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK

The Discoveries Centre for Regenerative and Precision Medicine, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK

Department of Biomaterials Science, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Education · INNOPOLIS Foundation

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Carmeliet · Nature · 2005 · 438 · 93210.1038/nature04478 ↗
2. Potente · Cell · 2011 · 146 · 87310.1016/j.cell.2011.08.039 ↗
3. Kim · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 201810.1016/j.addr.2018.12.014 ↗
4. Torres · Biomaterials · 2018 · 154 · 3410.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.051 ↗
5. Nelson · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 60710.1002/adma.201303520 ↗
6. Jin · J. Tissue Eng. · 2018 · 9 · 204173141881750
7. Norelli · J. Tissue Eng. · 2018 · 9 · 204173141881118310.1177/2041731418811183 ↗
8. Martino · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2015 · 94 · 4110.1016/j.addr.2015.04.007 ↗
9. Carmeliet · Nat. Med. · 2003 · 9 · 65310.1038/nm0603-653 ↗
10. Mitrousis · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2018 · 3 · 44110.1038/s41578-018-0057-0 ↗
11. Briquez · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2016 · 1 · 1500610.1038/natrevmats.2015.6 ↗
12. Thakur · J. Tissue Eng. · 2018 · 9 · 20417314177512810.1177/2041731417751286 ↗
13. Dashnyam · Biomaterials · 2017 · 116 · 14510.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.053 ↗
14. Boldbaatar · Acta Biomater. · 2019 · 83 · 32210.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.025 ↗
15. Dashnyam · J. Tissue Eng. · 2017 · 8 · 204173141770733910.1177/2041731417707339 ↗
16. Brudno · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 920110.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.007 ↗
17. Martino · Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. · 2015 · 3 · 4510.3389/fbioe.2015.00045 ↗
18. Kumar · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 86010.1021/nn506544b ↗
19. Kim · BioMed. Res. Int. · 2016 · 2016 · 8
20. Xiong · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2019 · 105 · 11006510.1016/j.msec.2019.110065 ↗
21. Lee · Biomaterials · 2017 · 142 · 6210.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.07.014 ↗
22. Lee · Acta Biomater. · 2017 · 60 · 9310.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.021 ↗
23. Han · Biomater. Sci. · 2013 · 1 · 37910.1039/C2BM00108J ↗
24. El-Fiqi · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2015 · 3 · 132110.1039/C4TB01634C ↗
25. Kim · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 205910.1021/acsami.6b12089 ↗
26. Schloßmacher · RSC Adv. · 2013 · 3 · 1118510.1039/c3ra23341c ↗
27. Venkatesan · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2015 · 72 · 26910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.008 ↗
28. Perullini · Open Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 2 · 3
29. Pannier · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2014 · 2 · 789610.1039/C4TB00944D ↗
30. Lee · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2014 · 2 · 578510.1039/C4TB00931B ↗
31. Jahan · Biomater. Sci. · 2016 · 4 · 2510.1039/C5BM00163C ↗
32. Olmos Buitrago · Acta Biomater. · 2015 · 28 · 18310.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.021 ↗
33. Patel · Mater. Horiz. · 2019 · 6 · 43410.1039/C8MH00966J ↗
34. Lee · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2012 · 37 · 10610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003 ↗
35. Perez · Tissue Eng., Part A · 2014 · 20 · 10310.1089/ten.tea.2013.0198 ↗
36. Perez · Acta Biomater. · 2015 · 23 · 29510.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.002 ↗
37. Buitrago · Acta Biomater. · 2015 · 28 · 18310.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.021 ↗
38. Perez · Acta Biomater. · 2015 · 21 · 210.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.013 ↗
39. Perez · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2013 · 101 · 110310.1002/jbm.a.34406 ↗
40. Foglia · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2013 · 1 · 628310.1039/c3tb21067g ↗
41. Chervin-Pétinot · J. Biol. Chem. · 2012 · 287 · 755610.1074/jbc.M111.328682 ↗
42. Hoppe · Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 275710.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004 ↗
43. Beck · Nanomedicine · 2012 · 8 · 79310.1016/j.nano.2011.11.003 ↗
44. Grosso · Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. · 2017 · 5 · 6810.3389/fbioe.2017.00068 ↗
45. Jia · Stem Cell Res. Ther. · 2019 · 10 · 1210.1186/s13287-018-1115-7 ↗
46. Rodrigues · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2015 · 1 · 76010.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00113 ↗
47. Barradas · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 320510.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.020 ↗
48. Viti · PLoS One · 2016 · 11 · e014817310.1371/journal.pone.0148173 ↗
49. Jung · J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. · 2010 · 21 · 1649
50. Jun · BioMed. Res. Int. · 2017 · 2017 · 910.1155/2017/2495282 ↗
51. Saravanan · J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 11 · 112410.1166/jbn.2015.2057 ↗
52. Zhai · Acta Biomater. · 2013 · 9 · 800410.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.024 ↗