Characterisation of bone regeneration in 3D printed ductile PCL/PEG/hydroxyapatite scaffolds with high ceramic microparticle concentrations
Source abstract
Abstract
3D printed bioactive glass or bioceramic particle reinforced composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering currently suffer from low particle concentration (<50 wt%) hence low osteoconductivity. Meanwhile, composites with very high inorganic particle concentrations are very brittle. Scaffolds combining high particle content and ductility are urgently required for bone tissue engineering. Herein, 3D printed PCL/hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds with high ceramic concentration (up to 90 wt%) are made ductile (>100% breaking strain) by adding poly(ethylene glycol) which is biocompatible and FDA approved. The scaffolds require no post-printing washing to remove hazardous components. More exposure of HA microparticles on strut surfaces is enabled by incorporating higher HA concentrations. Compared to scaffolds with 72 wt% HA, scaffolds with higher HA content (90 wt%) enhance matrix formation but not new bone volume after 12 weeks implantation in rat calvarial defects. Histological analyses demonstrate that bone regeneration within the 3D printed scaffolds is via intramembranous ossification and starts in the central region of pores. Fibrous tissue that resembles non-union tissue within bone fractures is formed within pores that do not have new bone. The amount of blood vessels is similar between scaffolds with mainly fibrous tissue and those with more bone tissue, suggesting vascularization is not a deciding factor for determining the type of tissues regenerated within the pores of 3D printed scaffolds. Multinucleated immune cells are commonly present in all scaffolds surrounding the struts, suggesting a role of managing inflammation in bone regeneration within 3D printed scaffolds.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechatronic Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China 330031
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China 330006
Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK NG7 2RD
Composites Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK NG7 2RD
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Woodruff · Mater. Today · 2012 · 15 · 43010.1016/S1369-7021(12)70194-3 ↗
2. Ma · Acta Biomater. · 2018 · 79 · 3710.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.026 ↗
3. Bose · Mater. Today · 2013 · 16 · 49610.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
4. Tang · Biomaterials · 2016 · 83 · 36310.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.024 ↗
5. Shao · Biofabrication · 2017 · 9 · 02500310.1088/1758-5090/aa663c ↗
6. Malda · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 6310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.046 ↗
7. Ghouse · Appl. Mater. Today · 2019 · 15 · 37710.1016/j.apmt.2019.02.017 ↗
8. Zhang · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 103510.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.001 ↗
9. Luo · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 2437710.1021/acsami.5b08911 ↗
10. Nommeots-Nomm · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2018 · 38 · 83710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.006 ↗
11. Sawyer · Biomaterials · 2009 · 30 · 247910.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.055 ↗
12. McNamara · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 694110.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.013 ↗
13. Roohani-Esfahani · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 1946810.1038/srep19468 ↗
14. Yang · Tissue Eng. · 2001 · 7 · 67910.1089/107632701753337645 ↗
15. Tcacencu · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2018 · 90 · 110.1016/j.msec.2018.04.022 ↗
16. Poh · Acta Biomater. · 2016 · 30 · 31910.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.012 ↗
17. Moncal · J. Mater. Res. · 2018 · 33 · 197210.1557/jmr.2018.111 ↗
18. Lin · Artif. Organs · 1999 · 23 · 18610.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06164.x ↗
19. Bruyas · J. Mater. Res. · 2018 · 33 · 194810.1557/jmr.2018.112 ↗
20. Chuenjitkuntaworn · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2010 · 94A · 24110.1002/jbm.a.32657 ↗
21. Guillaume · Acta Biomater. · 2017 · 54 · 38610.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.006 ↗
22. Bohner · Acta Biomater. · 2020 · 113 · 2310.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.022 ↗
23. Jones · Acta Biomater. · 2013 · 9 · 445710.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
24. Jakus · Sci. Transl. Med. · 2016 · 8 · 358ra12710.1126/scitranslmed.aaf7704 ↗
25. . Limiting the Use of Certain Phthalates as Excipients in CDER-Regulated Products . 2012; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/limiting-use-certain-phthalates-excipients-cder-regulated-products#_Toc462221103
26. S.Stewart , et al. , Translational Regenerative Medicine , ed. A. Atala and J. G. Allickson , 2015 , Academic Press , Boston . pp. 313–33310.1016/B978-0-12-410396-2.00024-4 ↗
27. Franz-Odendaal · Dev. Dyn. · 2006 · 235 · 17610.1002/dvdy.20603 ↗
28. Mackie · Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. · 2008 · 40 · 4610.1016/j.biocel.2007.06.009 ↗
29. Harada · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 780010.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.052 ↗
30. Thompson · Tissue Eng., Part A · 2016 · 22 · 55610.1089/ten.tea.2015.0457 ↗
31. Sheehy · Acta Biomater. · 2015 · 13 · 24510.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.031 ↗
32. Liu · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 1825210.1039/C7RA00861A ↗
33. Veronese · Drug Discovery Today · 2005 · 10 · 145110.1016/S1359-6446(05)03575-0 ↗
34. Okamoto · Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. · 2002 · 295 · 35410.1016/S0006-291X(02)00661-7 ↗
35. Zong · Eur. Cells Mater. · 2010 · 20 · 10910.22203/eCM.v020a10 ↗
36. McGovern · Dis. Model Mech. · 2018 · 11 · dmm03308410.1242/dmm.033084 ↗
37. Varghese · PLoS One · 2014 · 9 · e9680110.1371/journal.pone.0096801 ↗
38. Chuang · J. Polym. Res. · 2005 · 12 · 19710.1007/s10965-004-1868-9 ↗
39. Li · PLoS One · 2018 · 13 · 0193520
40. Pivsa-Art · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2016 · 133 · 4304410.1002/app.43044 ↗
41. Prasopthum · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 1889610.1021/acsami.9b01472 ↗
42. Kim · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2000 · 77 · 204910.1002/1097-4628(20000829)77:9<2049::AID-APP22>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
43. E.Langer , et al. , Plasticizers Derived from Post-Consumer PET , ed. E. Langer , et al. , William Andrew Publishing . 2020 , p. 1–11
44. Fu · Compos., Part B · 2008 · 39 · 93310.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002 ↗
45. Huang · Materials · 2018 · 11 · 12910.3390/ma11010129 ↗
46. Dalby · Nat. Mater. · 2014 · 13 · 55810.1038/nmat3980 ↗
47. Wennerberg · Clin. Oral Implants Res. · 2009 · 20 · 17210.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x ↗
48. Gittens · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 336310.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.037 ↗
49. Goldstein · J. Biomechanics · 1987 · 20 · 105510.1016/0021-9290(87)90023-6 ↗
50. L.Gibson , et al. , Cellular solids: structure and properties , 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , 199710.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
51. Petersen · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 443010.1038/s41467-018-06504-7 ↗
52. Milgram · Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · 1991 · 268 · 203
53. Carter · J. Histochem. Cytochem. · 1991 · 39 · 59910.1177/39.5.1707904 ↗
54. LeGeros · Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. · 2002 · 395 · 8110.1097/00003086-200202000-00009 ↗
55. Reed · J. Orthop. Res. · 2002 · 20 · 59310.1016/S0736-0266(01)00142-5 ↗
56. Anderson · Semin. Immunol. · 2008 · 20 · 8610.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
57. Väänänen · Arch. Biochem. Biophys. · 2008 · 473 · 13210.1016/j.abb.2008.03.037 ↗
58. Wenisch · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A · 2003 · 67 · 71310.1002/jbm.a.10091 ↗
59. Loi · Bone · 2016 · 86 · 11910.1016/j.bone.2016.02.020 ↗
60. Baht · Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. · 2018 · 16 · 13810.1007/s11914-018-0423-2 ↗
61. Iwakura · J. Orthop. Res. · 2009 · 27 · 20810.1002/jor.20739 ↗
62. Bajada · Bone · 2009 · 45 · 72610.1016/j.bone.2009.06.015 ↗