journal article·2019Open access

The influence of electrically conductive and non-conductive nanocomposite scaffolds on the maturation and excitability of engineered cardiac tissues

Ali Navaei, Kiarash Rahmani Eliato, Robert Ros, Raymond Q. Migrino, Brigham C. Willis, Mehdi Nikkhah

Biomaterials Science· Volume 7· Issue 2

Abstract

Utilization of electrically conductive nanomaterials for developing nanocomposite scaffolds has been at the center of attention for engineering functional cardiac tissues. The primary motive in the use of conductive nanomaterials has been to develop biomimetic scaffolds to recapitulate the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the native heart and to promote cardiac tissue maturity, excitability and electrical signal propagation. Alternatively, it is well accepted that the inclusion of nanomaterials also alters the stiffness and nano-scale topography of the scaffolds. However, what is missing in the literature is that to what extent the sole presence of nanomaterials within a scaffold, regardless of their conductivity, influences the maturation and excitability of engineered cardiac tissues. To address this knowledge gap, we developed four different classes of gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogels, with varied concentrations, embedded electrically conductive gold nanorods (GNRs) and non-conductive silica nanomaterials (SNPs), to assess the influence of matrix stiffness and the presence of nanomaterials on cardiac cell adhesion, protein expression (i.e. maturation), and tissue-level excitability. Our results demonstrated that either embedding nanomaterials (i.e. GNRs and SNPs) or increasing the matrix stiffness significantly promoted cellular retention and the expression of cardiac-specific markers, including sarcomeric α-actinin (SAC), cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and connexin43 (Cx43) gap junctions. Notably, excitation voltage thresholds at a high frequency (i.e. 2 Hz and higher), in both coupled and uncoupled gap junctions induced by heptanol, were lower for scaffolds embedded conductive GNRs or non-conductive SNPs, independent of matrix stiffness. Overall, our findings demonstrated that the sole presence of nanomaterials within the scaffolding matrix had a more pronounced influence as compared to the scaffold stiffness on the cell-cell coupling, maturation and excitability of engineered cardiac tissues.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering (SBHSE)

Arizona State University

Tempe

USA

Department of Physics

Center for Biological Physics

Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System

Phoenix

University of Arizona College of Medicine

Phoenix Children's Hospital

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. Navaei · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 330210.1039/C6RA26279A ↗
2. Navaei · Acta Biomater. · 2016 · 41 · 13310.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.027 ↗
3. Dvir · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 72010.1038/nnano.2011.160 ↗
4. Shevach · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 579210.1021/nl502673m ↗
5. Shin · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 236910.1021/nn305559j ↗
6. Shin · Small · 2016 · 12 · 367710.1002/smll.201600178 ↗
7. Cutts · Biomarker Insights · 2015 · 10s1 · BMI.S2031310.4137/BMI.S20313 ↗
8. Kharaziha · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2016 · 5 · 153310.1002/adhm.201600088 ↗
9. Pok · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 982210.1021/nn503693h ↗
10. Ye · Biotarget · 2017 · 1 · 510.21037/biotarget.2017.08.01 ↗
11. Gajendiran · J. Ind. Eng. Chem. · 2017 · 51 · 1210.1016/j.jiec.2017.02.031 ↗
12. Kankala · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2018 · 4 · 80010.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00913 ↗
13. Shevach · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2013 · 1 · 521010.1039/c3tb20584c ↗
14. Fleischer · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 941010.1039/C4NR00300D ↗
15. You · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 364310.1021/nl201514a ↗
16. Zhou · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 373310.1038/srep03733 ↗
17. Bedada · Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. · 2016 · 1863 · 182910.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.11.005 ↗
18. Kolanowski · Int. J. Cardiol. · 2017 · 241 · 37910.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.099 ↗
19. Robertson · Stem Cells · 2013 · 31 · 82910.1002/stem.1331 ↗
20. Martinelli · Front. Physiol. · 2013 · 4 · 23910.3389/fphys.2013.00239 ↗
21. Shapira · Int. Mater. Rev. · 2016 · 61 · 110.1179/1743280415Y.0000000012 ↗
22. Liu · ACS Sens. · 2017 · 2 · 100610.1021/acssensors.7b00279 ↗
23. Li · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 131710.1021/acsnano.5b06692 ↗
24. Tjong · Mater. Sci. Eng. R: Rep. · 2006 · 53 · 7310.1016/j.mser.2006.06.001 ↗
25. Gaharwar · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2014 · 111 · 44110.1002/bit.25160 ↗
26. Gaharwar · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2013 · 33 · 180010.1016/j.msec.2012.12.099 ↗
27. Bhana · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2010 · 105 · 114810.1002/bit.22647 ↗
28. Boothe · Cell Biochem. Biophys. · 2016 · 74 · 52710.1007/s12013-016-0758-1 ↗
29. Carson · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 2192310.1021/acsami.5b11671 ↗
30. K. Deok-Ho , K.Pilnam , K. Y.Suh , C.Seung Kyu , L.Sang Ho and K.Byungkyu , IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference, Shanghai, 2005 , pp. 4091–4094
31. Jacot · Biophys. J. · 2008 · 95 · 347910.1529/biophysj.107.124545 ↗
32. Ribeiro · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2015 · 112 · 1270510.1073/pnas.1508073112 ↗
33. Sun · Biomaterials · 2015 · 55 · 8410.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.030 ↗
34. Saini · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2015 · 4 · 196110.1002/adhm.201500331 ↗
35. Peela · Biomaterials · 2016 · 81 · 7210.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.039 ↗
36. G. Gerlach and K.-F.Arndt , Hydrogel sensors and actuators , Springer , Heidelberg, New York , 2009
37. Nichol · Biomaterials · 2010 · 31 · 553610.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 ↗
38. Cha · Small · 2014 · 10 · 51410.1002/smll.201302182 ↗
39. Shin · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 36210.1021/nn203711s ↗
40. Sneddon · Int. J. Eng. Sci. · 1965 · 3 · 4710.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
41. Tandon · Nat. Protoc. · 2009 · 4 · 15510.1038/nprot.2008.183 ↗
42. Navaei · Acta Biomater. · 2016 · 32 · 1010.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.019 ↗
43. Keevil · Pflügers Arch. · 2000 · 440 · 27510.1007/s004240000264 ↗
44. Takens-Kwak · Am. J. Physiol.: Cell Physiol. · 1992 · 262 · C153110.1152/ajpcell.1992.262.6.C1531 ↗
45. Kim · Lab Chip · 2011 · 11 · 180110.1039/c1lc20098d ↗
46. Dutta · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2007 · 9 · 63110.1007/s11051-006-9184-4 ↗
47. Lee Dae · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2017 · 101 · 245010.1111/jace.15395 ↗
48. Gaharwar Akhilesh · Macromol. Biosci. · 2012 · 12 · 77910.1002/mabi.201100508 ↗
49. Chen · Surf. Interface Anal. · 2003 · 35 · 36910.1002/sia.1544 ↗
50. Khelifa · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2013 · 1 · 1033410.1039/c3ta11668a ↗
51. GEANDR-Co., General Engineering and Research Company, https://geandr.com/collections/silica-products/products/silica-nanoparticles?variant=1190959415302
52. Ren · Chem. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 200810.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03548 ↗
53. Young · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 642510.1038/srep06425 ↗
54. Dalby · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 99710.1038/nmat2013 ↗
55. Scuderi · Front. Cell Dev. Biol. · 2017 · 5 · 5010.3389/fcell.2017.00050 ↗
56. Rodriguez · Biophys. J. · 2011 · 101 · 245510.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.057 ↗
57. Forte · Tissue Eng., Part A · 2012 · 18 · 183710.1089/ten.tea.2011.0707 ↗
58. Gizurarson · Cell. Physiol. Biochem. · 2012 · 30 · 47710.1159/000339029 ↗
59. Tse · Mol. Med. Rep. · 2016 · 14 · 406910.3892/mmr.2016.5738 ↗
60. Scopelliti · PLoS One · 2010 · 5 · e1186210.1371/journal.pone.0011862 ↗
61. Park · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 498710.1021/nn507149w ↗
62. Park · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2015 · 25 · 259010.1002/adfm.201500365 ↗
63. Amezcua · Nanomaterials · 2016 · 6 · 13310.3390/nano6070133 ↗
64. Wei · J. Nanobiotechnol. · 2017 · 15 · 7510.1186/s12951-017-0310-5 ↗
65. Wilson · Tissue Eng. · 2005 · 11 · 110.1089/ten.2005.11.1 ↗
66. Liau · Regener. Med. · 2012 · 7 · 18710.2217/rme.11.122 ↗
67. Weining · Biofabrication · 2014 · 6 · 02410910.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024109 ↗
68. Meiry · J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. · 2003 · 12 · 126910.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.01269.x ↗
69. Halbach · Circ. Res. · 2007 · 101 · 48410.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.153643 ↗
70. Belostotskaya · Cell Cycle · 2014 · 13 · 91010.4161/cc.27768 ↗
71. Veerman · Stem Cells Dev. · 2015 · 24 · 103510.1089/scd.2014.0533 ↗
72. Zhu · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 4321010.1038/srep43210 ↗
73. Goversen · Pharmacol. Ther. · 2018 · 183 · 12710.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.10.001 ↗