journal article·2020

A medical adhesive used in a wet environment by blending tannic acid and silk fibroin

Xijie Gao, Qiyuan Dai, Longtao Yao, Hua Dong, Qingtao Li, Xiaodong Cao

Biomaterials Science· Volume 8· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

A multifunctional and effective medical adhesive with a combination of high toughness and superior adhesion is highly desired in biomedical fields. However, clinical application of medical adhesives is still limited due to their weak adhesion to wet tissue. In this study, a novel medical adhesive called TASK composed of tannic acid (TA) and silk fibroin (SF) based on polyphenol-gel systems was developed. TASK powder was prepared by a simple physical mixture of pyrogallol-rich tannic acid and silk fibroin in aqueous solution and further freeze drying, which was stable and convenient for sterilization before clinical application. The TASK composite gel was formed by just adding water to the TASK powder. TASK showed improved wet-adhesive properties and stability; its adhesion strength after 5 h in water reached 180.9 ± 27.4 kPa. ATR-FTIR results indicated that the plentiful phenolic hydroxyl groups in TA allowed TASK to maintain adhesion to tissue in a wet environment. Furthermore, no chemical modification or covalent cross-linking was required for this wet-adhesive TASK which may facilitate its clinical application.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering

School of Materials Science and Engineering

South China University of Technology

Guangzhou

People's Republic of China

School of Medicine

510641

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. J. C. Dumville , P.Coulthard , H. V.Worthington , P.Riley , N.Patel , J.Darcey , M.Esposito , M.van der Elst and O. J.van Waes , Cochrane Database Syst. Rev , 2014 , p. CD004287
2. Schwab · Hernia · 2006 · 10 · 27210.1007/s10029-006-0080-8 ↗
3. Frost · NPG Asia Mater. · 2016 · 8 · e28010.1038/am.2016.73 ↗
4. Vakalopoulos · Ann. Surg. · 2015 · 261 · 32310.1097/SLA.0000000000000599 ↗
5. Leggat · ANZ J. Surg. · 2007 · 77 · 20910.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04020.x ↗
6. Mintz · Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. · 2001 · 31 · 108
7. Henrik · Am. J. Surg. · 2001 · 182 · 15S10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00772-3 ↗
8. Gawel · Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. · 1998 · 4 · 7410.1111/j.1755-0238.1998.tb00137.x ↗
9. K. H. Gustavson , Chemistry of the Tanning Process , 1956
10. Chung · Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. · 1998 · 38 · 42110.1080/10408699891274273 ↗
11. Le · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 4218610.1021/acsami.8b18979 ↗
12. Zhang · Biomater. Sci. · 2020 · 8 · 145510.1039/C9BM02029B ↗
13. Yeo · Biomater. Sci. · 2019 · 8 · 114810.1039/C9BM01384A ↗
14. Nam · Soft Matter · 2019 · 15 · 78510.1039/C8SM02144A ↗
15. Kim · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2015 · 25 · 240210.1002/adfm.201500034 ↗
16. Shin · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2015 · 25 · 127010.1002/adfm.201403992 ↗
17. Liu · Biomaterials · 2018 · 171 · 8310.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.023 ↗
18. Hardy · Polymer · 2008 · 49 · 430910.1016/j.polymer.2008.08.006 ↗
19. Partlow · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 461510.1002/adfm.201400526 ↗
20. Yucel · Biophys. J. · 2009 · 97 · 204410.1016/j.bpj.2009.07.028 ↗
21. Zhu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2018 · 28 · 170475710.1002/adfm.201704757 ↗
22. Seo · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2018 · 28 · 180080210.1002/adfm.201800802 ↗
23. Burke · Biomacromolecules · 2016 · 17 · 23710.1021/acs.biomac.5b01330 ↗
24. Li · Science · 2017 · 357 · 37810.1126/science.aah6362 ↗
25. Luo · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2020 · 9 · e190142310.1002/adhm.201901423 ↗
26. Wang · Polymer · 2019 · 163 · 14410.1016/j.polymer.2019.01.004 ↗
27. Khoultchaev · J. Chem. Eng. · 1998 · 76 · 261
28. Fan · Macromolecules · 2017 · 50 · 66610.1021/acs.macromol.6b02106 ↗
29. Shamanthaka Sastry · J. Agric. Food Chem. · 1990 · 38 · 210310.1021/jf00102a001 ↗
30. Daniliuc · Polymer · 1996 · 37 · 521910.1016/0032-3861(96)00328-X ↗
31. Han · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 42110.1002/adfm.201504160 ↗
32. Ma · Polym. Int. · 2016 · 66 · 15110.1002/pi.5272 ↗
33. Irem · Macromolecules · 2008 · 41 · 396210.1021/ma800186q ↗
34. Jin · Polym. Int. · 2016 · 65 · 125810.1002/pi.5187 ↗
35. Erel · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2011 · 361 · 47710.1016/j.jcis.2011.05.033 ↗
36. Luo · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 87210.1002/adfm.201503450 ↗
37. Lammel · Biomaterials · 2010 · 31 · 458310.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.024 ↗
38. Hu · Macromolecules · 2006 · 39 · 616110.1021/ma0610109 ↗
39. Bai · Nanoscale Horiz. · 2019 · 4 · 133310.1039/C9NH00317G ↗
40. Jin · Nature · 2003 · 424 · 105710.1038/nature01809 ↗
41. Spencer · Phytochemistry · 1988 · 27 · 239710.1016/0031-9422(88)87004-3 ↗
42. Haslam · J. Nat. Prod. · 1996 · 59 · 20510.1021/np960040+ ↗
43. Creton · MRS Bull. · 2003 · 28 · 43410.1557/mrs2003.124 ↗
44. Yang · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2018 · 6 · 115310.1039/C7TC05593E ↗
45. Phadke · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2012 · 109 · 438310.1073/pnas.1201122109 ↗
46. Sun · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 913210.1021/acsami.0c01022 ↗
47. Endrizzi · J. Adhesion · 2009 · 85 · 54610.1080/00218460902996457 ↗
48. Lin · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 104 · 378210.1073/pnas.0607852104 ↗
49. Johnston · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2018 · 4 · 281510.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00544 ↗