Influence of thickness and morphology of MoS 2 on the performance of counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Non-platinum electrodes for photoelectric devices are challenging and attractive to the scientific community. A thin film of molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) was prepared on substrates coated with fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) to substitute the platinum counter electrode (CE) for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Herein, we synthesized layered and honeycomb-like MoS 2 thin films via the cyclic voltammetry (CV) route. Thickness and morphology of the MoS 2 thin films were controlled via the concentration of precursor solution. The obtained results showed that MoS 2 thin films formed at a low precursor concentration had a layered morphology while a honeycomb-like MoS 2 thin film was formed at a high precursor concentration. Both types of MoS 2 thin film were composed of 1T and 2H structures and exhibited excellent electrocatalytic activity for the I 3 –/ I − redox couple. DSSCs assembled using these MoS 2 CEs showed a maximal power conversion efficiency of 7.33%. The short-circuit value reached 16.3 mA·cm −2 , which was higher than that of a conventional Pt/FTO CE (15.3 mA·cm −2 ). This work reports for the first time the possibility to obtain a honeycomb-like MoS 2 thin film morphology by the CV method and investigates the effect of film structure on the electrocatalytic activity and photovoltaic performance of CEs for DSSC application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.12.03710.1016/j.dyepig.2017.12.037 ↗
2. 10.1021/nn101642810.1021/nn1016428 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.05.02810.1016/j.carbon.2009.05.028 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20110350910.1002/adma.201103509 ↗
5. 10.1039/c0cc00432d10.1039/c0cc00432d ↗
6. 10.1039/c3ta12603j10.1039/c3ta12603j ↗
7. 10.1039/c1cp22819f10.1039/c1cp22819f ↗
8. 10.1039/c2jm33679k10.1039/c2jm33679k ↗
9. 10.1002/cphc.20150064410.1002/cphc.201500644 ↗
10. 10.1039/c4ra00583j10.1039/c4ra00583j ↗
11. 10.1039/c6ta04743b10.1039/c6ta04743b ↗
12. 10.1039/c6nr03635j10.1039/c6nr03635j ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.01110.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.011 ↗
14. 10.1039/c3dt53356e10.1039/c3dt53356e ↗
15. 10.1186/s11671-015-1156-010.1186/s11671-015-1156-0 ↗
16. 10.1039/c3ta14313a10.1039/c3ta14313a ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.7b0577510.1021/acsami.7b05775 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.6b0594010.1021/jacs.6b05940 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.114148310.1126/science.1141483 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.01.00610.1016/j.mssp.2015.01.006 ↗
21. 10.1039/c6ra02494g10.1039/c6ra02494g ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.02310.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.023 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.04710.1016/j.solener.2020.02.047 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.00110.1016/j.solener.2020.06.001 ↗
25. 10.5539/mas.v4n3p210.5539/mas.v4n3p2 ↗
26. Wang · International Journal of Electrochemical Science · 2015 · 10 · 837410.1016/S1452-3981(23)11103-5 ↗
27. 10.1016/s0277-5387(00)84960-810.1016/s0277-5387(00)84960-8 ↗
28. 10.1149/2.0011610jes10.1149/2.0011610jes ↗
29. 10.1016/0040-6090(95)08204-210.1016/0040-6090(95)08204-2 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.10.06510.1016/j.electacta.2010.10.065 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0264910.1021/acsnano.8b02649 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-018-30867-y10.1038/s41598-018-30867-y ↗
33. 10.1021/nl503639710.1021/nl5036397 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11249-011-9774-x10.1007/s11249-011-9774-x ↗
35. 10.1088/2053-1583/2/3/03500310.1088/2053-1583/2/3/035003 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.crci.2015.08.01410.1016/j.crci.2015.08.014 ↗
37. 10.1002/pip.335010.1002/pip.3350 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.10810.1016/j.solener.2020.03.108 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11422310.1016/j.molliq.2020.114223 ↗