Criterion for cathodic protection of 25CD4/Inconel 182 system
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study aims to investigate the cathodic protection criterion of a galvanic system of low alloy steel 25CD4 substrate /Inconel 182 austenitic stainless-steel filler metal couple obtained using Shield Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) process. The microstructure investigation revealed the presence of Type II boundary along the steel substrate/Inconel interface where high carbon content and high hardness were recorded. The electrochemical tests evaluated in marine environment (3.5% NaCl) at room temperature revealed that the corrosion potential (Ecorr) of the interface was between the steels substrate and the Inconel 182 filler metal ones, On the other hand, the current density (Icorr) and corrosion rate were slightly higher in the overlaid area. In order to determine the system protection criterion, chronopotentiometry method was introduced. It was found that the cathodic protection criterion for the assembly is based on the criterion of the least noble materialwhich is the steel substrate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Ivanov · 2016
2. cathodic protection of cooling water systems and selection of appropriate materials10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.074 ↗
3. the significance of aluminium alloys for cathodic protection technology
4. Ashworth · Principles of cathodic protection. Shreir’sCorros · 2010 · 4 · 2747
5. Uhlig · 1985
6. 1961
7. Insulated joint for corrosion protection of buried subway gallery structure: consideration on cable ground connection10.1109/TPWRD.2005.858780 ↗
8. CosimoPisani: ' A novel approach to design cathodic protection system for high-voltage
9. Principle of electrochemical corrosion and cathodicprotection
10. Submarine cable cathodic protection10.1109/67.893354 ↗
11. Introduction to the physical Metallurgy of welding
12. NACE SP0169, Standard Practice Control of External Corrosion on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems for state of 2013 New York.
13. Marine Surveyor Plaisance voile/moteur – Servitude –
14. ASTM, G1-03, 2003 Standard practice for preparing, cleaning and evaluating corrosion test specimens. 2003.
15. Kelly · 2002
16. Handbook of Electrochemistry,Edited by: Cynthia G. Zoski Cynthia G. Zoski ,New Mexico State University, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA,2017.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51958-0.X5000-9.10.1016/B978-0-444-51958-0.X5000-9 ↗
17. “Effect of Heat Treatment Temperatures on Microstructure and Corrosion Properties of Inconel 625
18. Microstructure and stress corrosion cracking of the fusion boundary region in an alloy 182–A533B low alloy steel dissimilar weld joint10.1016/j.corsci.2010.08.002 ↗
19. Hydrogen Damage
20. Effect of temperature on corrosion and cathodic protection of X65 pipeline steel in 3.5% NaCl solution10.20964/2019.01.54 ↗
21. New findings on the factors accelerating AC corrosion of buried pipelines10.1016/j.corsci.2013.09.005 ↗
22. Corrosive effects of the electromagnetic induction caused by the HVPL on the burred pipelines10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.03.005 ↗
23. Method for diagnosis of the effect of AC on the X70 pipeline due to an inductive coupling caused by HVPL10.1049/iet-smt.2016.0519 ↗
24. CP 3–Cathodic Protection Technologist COURSE MANUAL © NACE International, 2005.
25. ‘Microstructure and mechanical behavior in dissimilar SAF 2205/API X52 welded pipes’