Atomic force microscopy study of growth kinetics: Scaling in TiN–TiB2 nanocomposite films on Si(100)
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We used the reactive unbalanced close-field dc-magnetron sputtering growth of TiN–TiB2 on Si(1 0 0) at room temperature to determine if scaling theory provides insight into the kinetic mechanisms of two-phase nanocomposite thin films. Scaling analyses along with height-difference correlation functions of measured atomic force microscopy (AFM) images have shown that the TiN–TiB2 nanocomposite films with thickness ranging from 70 to 950 nm exhibit a kinetic surface roughening with the roughness increasing with thickness exponentially. The roughness exponent α and growth exponent β are determined to be ∼0.93 and ∼0.25, respectively. The value of dynamic exponent z, calculated by measurement of the lateral correlation length ξ, is ∼3.70, agreeing well with the ratio of α to β. These results indicate that the surface growth behavior of sputter-deposited TiN–TiB2 thin films follows the classical Family-Vicseck scaling and can be reasonably described by the noisy Mullins diffusion model, at which surface diffusion serves as the smoothing effect and shot noise as the roughening mechanism.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Barabasi · 1995
2. Family · 1991
3. Meakin · 1998
4. Family · J. Phys. A. · 1985 · 18 · L7510.1088/0305-4470/18/2/005 ↗
5. Mitterer · Vacuum · 1998 · 50 · 31310.1016/S0042-207X(98)00059-1 ↗
6. Li · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2002 · 326 · 27010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01499-X ↗
7. Kullmer · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2003 · 174/175 · 122910.1016/S0257-8972(03)00532-2 ↗
8. Mayrhofer · Thin Solid Films · 2003 · 440 · 17410.1016/S0040-6090(03)00858-7 ↗
9. Karvankova · Thin Solid Films · 2004 · 467 · 13310.1016/j.tsf.2004.03.046 ↗
10. Lu · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2005 · 23 · 44910.1116/1.1865117 ↗
11. Kardar · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1986 · 56 · 88910.1103/PhysRevLett.56.889 ↗
12. Beccaria · Phys. Rev. E · 1994 · 50 · 456010.1103/PhysRevE.50.4560 ↗
13. Yang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 377410.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3774 ↗
14. Palasantzas · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 1447210.1103/PhysRevB.48.14472 ↗
15. Kertesz · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1989 · 62 · 257110.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2571 ↗
16. Yang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 377410.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3774 ↗
17. Liu · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 355910.1063/1.1504497 ↗
18. Mullins · J. Appl. Phys. · 1957 · 28 · 33310.1063/1.1722742 ↗
19. Majaniemi · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 53 · 807110.1103/PhysRevB.53.8071 ↗
20. Lai · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1991 · 66 · 234810.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2348 ↗
21. Drotar · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 211810.1103/PhysRevB.62.2118 ↗
22. Yu · Phys. Rev. E · 2002 · 66 · 16032
23. Lee · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 53 · 787610.1103/PhysRevB.53.7876 ↗
24. Golubovic · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 9010.1103/PhysRevLett.78.90 ↗
25. Liu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 540410.1063/1.1637448 ↗
26. Liu · Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 595 · 2010.1016/j.susc.2005.07.032 ↗