Different ligand exchange solvents effect on the densification of CuIn 0.7 Ga 0.3 Se 2 prepared using the heating-up method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effects of different ligand exchange solvents and heat treatment conditions on the densification and microstructure development of CuIn 0.7 Ga 0.3 Se 2 (CIGS) crystallites synthesized using the heating-up method were studied in this work. The heat treatment effects on the organic molecules and crystalline structure were investigated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It was observed that oleylamine (OLA) adsorbed onto the CIGS surface was difficult to remove during sintering. Ligand-exchange with m-xylene or 1-hexanethiol can promote the removal of oleylamine adsorbed onto the CIGS surface and prevent the residual carbon from forming during sintering, which leads to grain growth and densification. A dense CuIn 0.7 Ga 0.3 Se 2 can be obtained using the precursor powders after ligand-exchange with 1-hexanethiol and m-xylene to remove organic molecules and sintering at 600 °C for 2 h under Se atmosphere.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Koo · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 313410.1021/ja8080605 ↗
2. Ahn · Colloids Surf. A · 2008 · 313–314 · 17110.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.04.089 ↗
3. Xiao · J. Mater. Chem. · 2001 · 11 · 141710.1039/b100092f ↗
4. Ahn · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 403610.1016/j.tsf.2006.10.102 ↗
5. Guillemoles · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2000 · 104 · 484910.1021/jp993143k ↗
6. http://taiyangnews.info/technology/cigs-on-the-record/.
7. Jackson · Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2016 · 10 · 58310.1002/pssr.201600199 ↗
8. Pan · J. Am. Chem. Soc. Commun. · 2008 · 130 · 562010.1021/ja711027j ↗
9. Wang · Solid State Sci. · 2009 · 11 · 196110.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.07.005 ↗
10. Hsu · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2011 · 94 · 303010.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04488.x ↗
11. Bucheri · Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. · 2013 · 2 · 16810.1016/j.coche.2013.03.004 ↗
12. Ahn · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 810810.1021/jp1007363 ↗
13. Azimi · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 182910.1039/C3EE43865A ↗
14. Guo1 · Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. · 2013 · 21 · 6410.1002/pip.2200 ↗
15. Garrigues · Analyst · 1992 · 117 · 184910.1039/an9921701849 ↗
16. Shyam · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2016 · 4 · 61110.1039/C5TC03383G ↗
17. Ferrari · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 07541410.1103/PhysRevB.64.075414 ↗
18. Kaelin · Thin Solid Films · 2003 · 431–432 · 5810.1016/S0040-6090(03)00194-9 ↗
19. Lee · Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells · 2011 · 95 · 292810.1016/j.solmat.2011.05.048 ↗
20. Kergommeaux · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 136 · 87710.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.08.014 ↗
21. Carrete · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 1598210.1021/ja4068639 ↗
22. Tauc · Phys. Status Solidi B · 1996 · 15 · 62710.1002/pssb.19660150224 ↗
23. Rawat · Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 50 · 100
24. Strzhemechny · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2002 · 20 · 244110.1116/1.1526357 ↗