Evaluation of surface characteristics under fretting of electrical contacts: Removal behaviour of hot dipped tin coating
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The fretting corrosion behaviour of hot dipped tin coating is investigated at low fretting cycles at ±25 μm displacement amplitude, 0.5N normal load, 3 Hz frequency, 45–50% relative humidity, and 25 ± 1 °C temperature. The typical characteristics of the change in contact resistance with fretting cycles are explained. The fretted surface is examined using laser scanning microscope, scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray analysis to assess the surface profile, extent of fretting damage, extent of oxidation and elemental distribution across the contact zone. The interdependence of extent of wear and oxidation increases the complexity of the fretting corrosion behaviour of tin coating. The variation of contact resistance clearly revealed the fretting of tin coating from 50 to 1200 cycles and the fretting of the substrate above 1200 cycles. The observed low and stable contact resistance region and the fluctuating resistance region at various fretting cycles are explained and substantiated with Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), laser scanning microscope (LSM) and energy dispersive analysis of X-rays (EDAX) analysis results of the fretted surface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 1998
2. Antler · Wear · 1985 · 106 · 510.1016/0043-1648(85)90101-2 ↗
3. Antler · IEEE Trans. Compon. Hybrids Manuf. Technol. · 1985 · 8 · 8710.1109/TCHMT.1985.1136462 ↗
4. Park · Int. J. Automot. Technol. · 2006 · 7 · 75
5. Tristani · Wear · 2001 · 249 · 1210.1016/S0043-1648(00)00560-3 ↗
6. Malucci · 1996 · 395
7. Heaton · 2001 · 209
8. Malucci · IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. · 2001 · 24 · 39910.1109/6144.946486 ↗
9. Flowers · IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. · 2004 · 27 · 6510.1109/TCAPT.2004.825791 ↗
10. 1972
11. De Baets · Wear · 1997 · 208 · 16910.1016/S0043-1648(96)07489-3 ↗
12. Rudolphi · Wear · 1996 · 201 · 24410.1016/S0043-1648(96)07259-6 ↗
13. Ghasemi · Wear · 1993 · 162–164 · 35710.1016/0043-1648(93)90519-R ↗
14. 1994
15. Swingler · Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. – Part D · 2000 · 214 · 61510.1243/0954407001527484 ↗
16. Hannel · Wear · 2001 · 249 · 76110.1016/S0043-1648(01)00685-8 ↗
17. Park · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2007 · 201 · 793910.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.03.039 ↗
18. Park · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2006 · 201 · 218110.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.03.031 ↗
19. Park · Wear · 2007 · 262 · 32010.1016/j.wear.2006.05.020 ↗
20. Park · Tribol. Int. · 2007 · 40 · 54810.1016/j.triboint.2006.05.008 ↗
21. Sankara Narayanan · Wear · 2007 · 262 · 22810.1016/j.wear.2006.05.015 ↗
22. Park · Surf. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 13 · 63510.1142/S0218625X06008591 ↗
23. Malucci · 1990 · 625
24. Hammam · IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. · 2000 · 23 · 27810.1109/6144.846765 ↗