journal article·2013-01

Atomistic simulation for the γ′-phase volume fraction dependence of the interfacial behavior of Ni-base superalloy

Xiyuan Yang, Wangyu Hu, Xingming Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract By means of molecular dynamics (MD) and the modified analytic embedded-atom method (MAEAM), we investigate the effect of the γ′-phase volume fraction (γ′-VF) on the apparent interface energy, the critical thickness of the interface transition region (ITR) and the binding mechanism of the γ/γ′ interface. The results indicate that the apparent interface energy increases linearly with the ITR width increasing. Then, by extrapolating the ITR width Δ l to zero, we can obtain the interface energy which is equal to the limiting value of the apparent interface energy. The volume fraction of the γ′-phase has no influence on the interface energy and the critical thickness of the ITR. The interface energy is in reasonable agreement with the previous results and the critical value of the ITR width is about 1.7 nm which also agrees well with the experimental and theoretical ones. Finally, the γ′-VF dependence of the apparent interface energy and the interface separation of the ITR with about 1.7 nm thickness are analyzed in more detail. The results reveal that the crystalline configuration of Ni-base superalloy (NBSA) with (60–70%) γ′-VF is the stablest, which is similar to the previous investigations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Reed · 2006
2. Wenderoth · Scripta Materialia · 2006 · 54 · 27510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.017 ↗
3. Mishin · Acta Materialia · 2010 · 58 · 111710.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.049 ↗
4. Retting · Acta Materialia · 2011 · 59 · 31710.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.035 ↗
5. Amouyal · Acta Materialia · 2011 · 59 · 672910.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.030 ↗
6. Perepezko · Science · 2009 · 326 · 106810.1126/science.1179327 ↗
7. Sutton · 1995
8. Ardell · Nature Materials · 2005 · 4 · 30910.1038/nmat1340 ↗
9. Wang · Acta Materialia · 2008 · 56 · 554410.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.024 ↗
10. Harada · 1998 · vol. 5
11. Mitarai · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A · 1998 · 29 · 53710.1007/s11661-998-0135-9 ↗
12. Biswas · Physical Reviews Letters · 2010 · 105 · 07610210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.076102 ↗
13. Ziegler · Science · 2004 · 306 · 176810.1126/science.1104173 ↗
14. Lu · Physical Reviews B · 2010 · 82 · 19510310.1103/PhysRevB.82.195103 ↗
15. Harmer · Science · 2011 · 332 · 18210.1126/science.1204204 ↗
16. Royer · Acta Materialia · 1998 · 46 · 535710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00206-7 ↗
17. A. Royer, P. Bastie, D. Bellet, B. Hennion, Neutron-diffraction measurements of the γ′- phase volume fraction in the single-crystal superalloy AM1 between 20°C and 1300°C, Revue de Métallurgie, CIT, SGM, 1996.
18. Murakumo · Acta Materialia · 2004 · 52 · 373710.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.028 ↗
19. Bauer · Scripta Materialia · 2010 · 63 · 119710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.036 ↗
20. Luo · Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2008 · 112 · 235910.1021/jp0770155 ↗
21. Wu · European Physical Journal B · 2007 · 57 · 30510.1140/epjb/e2007-00164-9 ↗
22. Xiao · European Physical Journal B · 2006 · 54 · 47910.1140/epjb/e2007-00018-6 ↗
23. Deng · Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2010 · 114 · 1102610.1021/jp100194p ↗
24. Parrinello · Journal of Applied Physics · 1981 · 52 · 718210.1063/1.328693 ↗
25. Nosé · Journal of Chemical Physics · 1984 · 81 · 51110.1063/1.447334 ↗
26. Hoover · Physical Reviews A · 1985 · 31 · 169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
27. Wang · Chinese Physics B · 2009 · 18 · 433910.1088/1674-1056/18/10/041 ↗
28. Mishin · Acta Materialia · 2004 · 52 · 145110.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.026 ↗
29. Benedek · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · 2002 · 14 · 2877
30. Wang · Applied Surface Science · 2009 · 255 · 366910.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.017 ↗
31. Hyland · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A · 1992 · 23 · 194710.1007/BF02647542 ↗
32. Coakley · Acta Materialia · 2011 · 59 · 85410.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.035 ↗
33. Kitashima · Intermetallics · 2008 · 16 · 77910.1016/j.intermet.2008.02.015 ↗
34. Hwang · Scripta Materialia · 2009 · 61 · 9210.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.011 ↗
35. Zhu · Physical Review B · 2005 · 72 · 01411110.1103/PhysRevB.72.014111 ↗
36. Asta · Physical Review B · 1998 · 57 · 1126510.1103/PhysRevB.57.11265 ↗
37. Borchers · Acta Materialia · 2005 · 53 · 369510.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.022 ↗
38. Shahandeh · Journal of Materials Science · 2007 · 42 · 944010.1007/s10853-007-1843-z ↗
39. Kitashima · Acta Materialia · 2009 · 57 · 202010.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.006 ↗
40. Howe · 1997
41. Ofori · Acta Materialia · 2005 · 53 · 9710.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.007 ↗
42. Hyland · Acta Materialia · 1998 · 46 · 366710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00039-1 ↗
43. Wang · Surface Science · 2008 · 602 · 260410.1016/j.susc.2008.06.017 ↗
44. Lachowics · Materials Characterization · 2008 · 59 · 56010.1016/j.matchar.2007.04.010 ↗
45. Kim · Scripta Materialia · 2000 · 43 · 38110.1016/S1359-6462(00)00439-5 ↗
46. Hyland · Scripta Materialia · 1991 · 25 · 47310.1016/0956-716X(91)90213-K ↗
47. George · Journal of Materials Research · 1990 · 5 · 163910.1557/JMR.1990.1639 ↗