journal article·2025-03Open access

Versatile BiFeO 3 shining in piezocatalysis: From materials engineering to diverse applications

Jian Dai, Zhenhao Fan, Hang Xie, Yitao Jiao, Fu Huang, Ahmad Azmin Mohamad, Yunfei Chang, Yangke Long, Dawei Wang

Journal of Advanced Ceramics· Volume 14· Issue 3

Abstract

The growing global demand for sustainable solutions to address energy and environmental challenges has spurred significant interest in catalytic technologies. Piezocatalysis has emerged as a sustainable technology for environmental remediation and energy conversion because of its unique characteristics of harvesting mechanical energy into electrochemical energy. Versatile BiFeO3 (BFO) stands out among a range of piezocatalysts for its distinctive integration of piezoelectric, multiferroic, and optical properties. This review critically examines piezocatalytic mechanisms, including energy band theory, screening charge effects, and displacement current theory, revealing the intricate roles of internal charges, screening charges, and piezoelectric electrons in driving catalytic reactions. Furthermore, the evolution of BFO-based piezocatalysis is systematically reviewed, emphasizing its structural characteristics, representative synthesis methods, performance optimization strategies, and diverse applications, such as organic pollutant degradation, H2 production, H2O2 generation, CO2 reduction, and sterilization. In particular, the underestimated ferroelectric polarization effect of BFO on CO2 reduction is critically analyzed and elaborated. This review identifies critical challenges and outlines future research directions to advance high-efficiency BFO-based piezocatalytic systems. Overall, this comprehensive analysis underscores the potential of BFO in piezocatalysis, bridging materials engineering with practical applications and offering insights into future advancements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. XG Meng. Direct methane conversion under mild condition by thermo, electro, or photocatalysis. 2019, 5: 2296-2325.10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.008 ↗
2. FF Zhang. Noble-metal single-atoms in thermocatalysis, electrocatalysis, and photocatalysis. 2021, 14: 2954-3009.10.1039/D1EE00247C ↗
3. J Liu. Which type of carbon nitride more suits photocatalysis: Amorphous or crystalline?. 2025, 35: 2413406.10.1002/adfm.202413406 ↗
4. TT Xu. Synthesis of crystalline g-C 3N 4 with rock/molten salts for efficient photocatalysis and piezocatalysis. 2024, 9: 890-898.10.1016/j.gee.2022.10.004 ↗
5. S Nishioka. Photocatalytic water splitting. 2023, 3: 42.10.1038/s43586-023-00226-x ↗
6. Y Gao. Microenvironment engineering of single/dual‐atom catalysts for electrocatalytic application. 2023, 35: 2209654.10.1002/adma.202209654 ↗
7. HN Sun. Electrochemical water splitting: Bridging the gaps between fundamental research and industrial applications. 2023, 6: 12441.10.1002/eem2.12441 ↗
8. SL Hou. Thermocatalytic conversion of CO 2 to valuable products activated by noble‐metal‐free metal‐organic frameworks. 2023, 62: 2305213.10.1002/anie.202305213 ↗
9. YQ Zhang. Thermoelectrocatalysis: An emerging strategy for converting waste heat into chemical energy. 2024, 11: nwae036.10.1093/nsr/nwae036 ↗
10. P Wu. Recent progress of thermocatalytic and photo/thermocatalytic oxidation for VOCs purification over manganese-based oxide catalysts. 2021, 55: 4268-4286.10.1021/acs.est.0c08179 ↗
11. SC Tu. Piezocatalysis and piezo-photocatalysis: Catalysts classification and modification strategy, reaction mechanism, and practical application. 2020, 30: 2005158.10.1002/adfm.202005158 ↗
12. JH He. Review of piezocatalysis and piezo-assisted photocatalysis in environmental engineering. 2023, 13: 1382.10.3390/cryst13091382 ↗
13. F Bößl. Piezocatalysis: Can catalysts truly dance. 2021, 32: 100537.10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100537 ↗
14. N Meng. Fundamentals, advances and perspectives of piezocatalysis: A marriage of solid-state physics and catalytic chemistry. 2023, 138: 101161.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101161 ↗
15. MY Wang. Enabling PIEZOpotential in PIEZOelectric semiconductors for enhanced catalytic activities. 2019, 58: 7526-7536.10.1002/anie.201811709 ↗
16. HM Elmehdi. Diode characteristics, piezo-photocatalytic antibiotic degradation and hydrogen production of Ce 3+ doped ZnO nanostructures. 2024, 350: 141015.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.141015 ↗
17. B Wang. Cocatalyst-free large ZnO single crystal for high-efficiency piezocatalytic hydrogen evolution from pure water. 2022, 65: 304-311.10.1016/j.jechem.2021.06.004 ↗
18. S Li. Mechanically induced highly efficient hydrogen evolution from water over piezoelectric SnSe nanosheets. 2022, 18: e2202507.10.1002/smll.202202507 ↗
19. S Li. Few-layer transition metal dichalcogenides (MoS 2, WS 2, and WSe 2) for water splitting and degradation of organic pollutants: Understanding the piezocatalytic effect. 2019, 66: 104083.10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104083 ↗
20. R Lei. Free layer-dependent piezoelectricity of oxygen-doped MoS 2 for the enhanced piezocatalytic hydrogen evolution from pure water. 2022, 576: 151851.10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151851 ↗
21. HY Lin. Revolutionary energy harvesting: Gravity‐driven piezocatalysts for sustainable hydrogen production in MoS2@Mo 2CT x systems. 2024, 14: 2402164.10.1002/aenm.202402164 ↗
22. J Dai. Enhanced Piezocatalytic Activity of Sr 0.5Ba 0.5Nb 2O 6 Nanostructures by Engineering Surface Oxygen Vacancies and Self-Generated Heterojunctions. 2021, 13: 7259-7267.10.1021/acsami.0c21202 ↗
23. XX Sun. Modulating polarization rotation to stimulate the high piezocatalytic activity of (K,Na)NbO 3 lead-free piezoelectric materials. 2022, 313: 121471.10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121471 ↗
24. JY Liao. Boosting piezo-catalytic activity of KNN‐based materials with phase boundary and defect engineering. 2023, 33: 2303637.10.1002/adfm.202303637 ↗
25. ZY Yao. Synergetic piezo-photocatalytic effect in a Bi 2MoO 6/BiOBr composite for decomposing organic pollutants. 2021, 560: 150037.10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150037 ↗
26. CL Xi. Ferroelectric heterostructure nanocomposites based on Bi 2MoO 6 nanosheets and Bi 2S 3 nanorods for rapid piezocatalysis of organic dyes and antibiotics. 2024, 241: 112942.10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112942 ↗
27. P Kumar. Degradation of dye through mechano-catalysis using BaBi 4Ti 4O 15 catalyst. 2024, 14: 18177.10.1038/s41598-024-68588-0 ↗
28. P Kumar. Dye degradation in planetary ball mill using BaBi 4Ti 4O 15. 2024, 35: 909.10.1007/s10854-024-12674-6 ↗
29. YJ Wang. Pulsed‐laser‐triggered piezoelectric photocatalytic CO 2 reduction over tetragonal BaTiO 3 nanocubes. 2023, 35: 2305257.10.1002/adma.202305257 ↗
30. SY Lu. Piezoelectric effect-assisted Z-scheme heterojunction ZnIn 2S 4/BaTiO 3 for improved photocatalytic reduction of CO 2 to CO. 2024, 483: 149058.10.1016/j.cej.2024.149058 ↗
31. J He. Isostructural phase transition-induced piezoelectricity in all-inorganic perovskite CsPbBr 3 for catalytic CO 2 reduction. 2024, 355: 124186.10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124186 ↗
32. WR Tian. Vibration‐driven reduction of CO 2 to acetate with 100 % selectivity by SnS nanobelt piezocatalysts. 2023, 62: 202306964.10.1002/anie.202306964 ↗
33. S Li. Recent advances of ferro-, piezo-, and pyroelectric nanomaterials for catalytic applications. 2020, 3: 1063-1079.10.1021/acsanm.0c00039 ↗
34. PW Jia. Piezocatalysts and piezo‐photocatalysts: From material design to diverse applications. 2024, 34: 2407309.10.1002/adfm.202407309 ↗
35. N Wang. Structure, performance, and application of BiFeO 3 nanomaterials. 2020, 12: 81.10.1007/s40820-020-00420-6 ↗
36. YQ Liu. Controllable electrical, magnetoelectric and optical properties of BiFeO 3 via domain engineering. 2022, 127: 100943.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100943 ↗
37. HL You. Harvesting the Vibration Energy of BiFeO 3 Nanosheets for Hydrogen Evolution. 2019, 58: 11779-11784.10.1002/anie.201906181 ↗
38. MJ Hong. Insight into the synergistic mechanism of sonolysis and sono-induced BiFeO 3 nanorods piezocatalysis in atenolol degradation: Ultrasonic parameters, ROS and degradation pathways. 2023, 335: 139084.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139084 ↗
39. J Roy. Gd-doped bismuth ferrite nanocomposite: A promising candidate for piezocatalytic degradation of organic dyes and pathogenic E. coli. 2024, 44: 103579.10.1016/j.surfin.2023.103579 ↗
40. QF Jing. Boosting piezo-photocatalytic activity of BiVO 4/BiFeO 3 heterojunctions through built-in polarization field tailoring carrier transfer performances. 2023, 464: 142617.10.1016/j.cej.2023.142617 ↗
41. JJ Long. Enhanced piezocatalytic activity of BiFeO 3 hollow spheres with surface iodine-grafting. 2023, 278: 118936.10.1016/j.ces.2023.118936 ↗
42. W Amdouni. Enhancement of the Piezocatalytic response of La-doped BiFeO 3 nanoparticles by defects synergy. 2024, 20: 2406425.10.1002/smll.202406425 ↗
43. J Curie. Development by pressure of polar electricity in hemihedral crystals with inclined faces. 1880, 3: 90.10.3406/bulmi.1880.1564 ↗
44. A Ali. Piezocatalytic removal of water bacteria and organic compounds: a review. 2022, 21: 1075-1092.10.1007/s10311-022-01537-3 ↗
45. S Asgari. Electron/hole piezocatalysis in chemical reactions. 2023, 4: 6092-6117.10.1039/D3MA00620D ↗
46. ZB Yang. High-performance piezoelectric energy harvesters and their applications. 2018, 2: 642-697.10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.011 ↗
47. T Zheng. Recent development in lead-free perovskite piezoelectric bulk materials. 2018, 98: 552-624.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.06.002 ↗
48. L Chen. High-electromechanical performance for high-power piezoelectric applications: Fundamental, progress, and perspective. 2022, 127: 100944.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100944 ↗
49. MT Chorsi. Piezoelectric biomaterials for sensors and actuators. 2019, 31: e1802084.10.1002/adma.201802084 ↗
50. M Ma. Carrier and oxygen vacancy engineering of aliovalent ion modified BiFeO 3 and their gas sensing properties. 2022, 370: 132400.10.1016/j.snb.2022.132400 ↗
51. DV Sabarianand. A review on control strategies for compensation of hysteresis and creep on piezoelectric actuators based micro systems. 2020, 140: 106634.10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106634 ↗
52. G Huangfu. Giant electric field–induced strain in lead-free piezoceramics. 2022, 378: 1125-1130.10.1126/science.ade2964 ↗
53. ZL Wang. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. 2006, 312: 242-246.10.1126/science.1124005 ↗
54. RK Pandey. Review on ZnO-based piezotronics and piezoelectric nanogenerators: aspects of piezopotential and screening effect. 2021, 4: 044011.10.1088/2515-7639/ac130a ↗
55. A Zaszczynska. Progress in the applications of smart piezoelectric materials for medical devices. 2020, 12: 2754.10.3390/polym12112754 ↗
56. H Li. Human joint enabled flexible self-sustainable sweat sensors. 2022, 92: 106786.10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106786 ↗
57. D Yu. Superflexible and lead-free piezoelectric nanogenerator as a highly sensitive self-powered sensor for human motion monitoring. 2021, 13: 117.10.1007/s40820-021-00649-9 ↗
58. KS Hong. Direct water splitting through vibrating piezoelectric microfibers in water. 2010, 1: 997-1002.10.1021/jz100027t ↗
59. KS Hong. Piezoelectrochemical effect: A new mechanism for Azo dye decolorization in aqueous solution through vibrating piezoelectric microfibers. 2012, 116: 13045-13051.10.1021/jp211455z ↗
60. MB Starr. Piezopotential-driven redox reactions at the surface of piezoelectric materials. 2012, 51: 5962-5966.10.1002/anie.201201424 ↗
61. MB Starr. Fundamental analysis of piezocatalysis process on the surfaces of strained piezoelectric materials. 2013, 3: 2160.10.1038/srep02160 ↗
62. J Dai. Remarkably boosting piezocatalytic performance of Sr 0.5Ba 0.5Nb 2O 6 piezoceramics via size optimization and oxygen vacancy engineering. 2024, 34: 2408754.10.1002/adfm.202408754 ↗
63. HY Gong. Retrievable hierarchically porous ferroelectric ceramics for greening the piezo-catalysis process. 2024, 34: 2311091.10.1002/adfm.202311091 ↗
64. L Zhou. Recent advances in piezocatalysts for dye degradation. 2024, 8: 2300652.10.1002/adsu.202300652 ↗
65. S Li. Mechanically driven water splitting over piezoelectric nanomaterials. 2024, 4: 100901.10.1016/j.checat.2024.100901 ↗
66. Y Zhao. Enhanced piezoelectricity and spectral absorption in Nd-doped bismuth titanate hierarchical microspheres for efficient piezo-photocatalytic H 2 production and pollutant degradation. 2024, 12: 1753-1763.10.1039/D3TA06341K ↗
67. H Sudrajat. Piezocatalysis: a promising alternative route for CO 2 reduction. 2023, 11: 24566-24590.10.1039/D3TA04758J ↗
68. PTT Phuong. Piezoelectric catalysis for efficient reduction of CO 2 using lead-free ferroelectric particulates. 2022, 95: 107032.10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107032 ↗
69. JP Ma. Physical mixing of piezo-electrocatalysts and graphene oxide to promote CO 2 conversion. 2023, 115: 108719.10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108719 ↗
70. Q Bai. Piezoelectric activatable nanozyme-based skin patch for rapid wound disinfection. 2022, 14: 26455-26468.10.1021/acsami.2c05114 ↗
71. JY Cheng. Piezocatalytic schottky junction treats atherosclerosis by a biomimetic trojan horse strategy. 2024, 36: 2312102.10.1002/adma.202312102 ↗
72. P Zhu. Piezocatalytic tumor therapy by ultrasound-triggered and BaTiO 3-mediated piezoelectricity. 2020, 32: e2001976.10.1002/adma.202001976 ↗
73. J Parra‐Nieto. Stimuli‐responsive nanocarriers as active enhancers of antitumoral immunotherapy. 2024, 11: 2400343.10.1002/admi.202400343 ↗
74. HJ Zheng. Steering piezocatalytic therapy for optimized tumoricidal effect. 2024, 34: 2400174.10.1002/adfm.202400174 ↗
75. WC Zhu. Intrinsically morphological effect of perovskite BaTiO 3 boosting piezocatalytic uranium extraction efficiency and mechanism investigation. 2023, 455: 131578.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131578 ↗
76. FX Gao. Biological calcium phosphate nanorods for piezocatalytical extraction of U(VI) from water. 2023, 16: 12772-12780.10.1007/s12274-023-6159-z ↗
77. K Kubota. Redox reactions of small organic molecules using ball milling and piezoelectric materials. 2019, 366: 1500-1504.10.1126/science.aay8224 ↗
78. A Sharma. NaNbO 3/ZnO piezocatalyst for nondestructive tooth cleaning and antibacterial activity. 2022, 25: 104915.10.1016/j.isci.2022.104915 ↗
79. SH Deng. Hierarchically designed biodegradable polylactide particles with unprecedented piezocatalytic activity and biosafety for tooth whitening. 2023, 24: 797-806.10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01252 ↗
80. F Mushtaq. Piezoelectrically enhanced photocatalysis with BiFeO 3 nanostructures for efficient water remediation. 2018, 4: 236-246.10.1016/j.isci.2018.06.003 ↗
81. J He. Breaking the intrinsic activity barriers of perovskite oxides photocatalysts for catalytic CO 2 reduction via piezoelectric polarization. 2022, 317: 121747.10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121747 ↗
82. J Roy. Piezo-responsive bismuth ferrite nanoparticle-mediated catalytic degradation of rhodamine B and pathogenic E. coli in aqueous medium and its extraction using external magnetic stimulation after successful treatment. 2022, 51: 16926-16936.10.1039/D2DT02918A ↗
83. K Wang. The mechanism of piezocatalysis: Energy band theory or screening charge effect. 2022, 61: 2110429.10.1002/anie.202110429 ↗
84. ZR Ren. Efficient CO 2 reduction to reveal the piezocatalytic mechanism: From displacement current to active sites. 2023, 320: 122007.10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122007 ↗
86. MB Starr. Coupling of piezoelectric effect with electrochemical processes. 2015, 14: 296-311.10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.01.035 ↗
87. H Sudrajat. Piezocatalytic reduction: an emerging research direction with bright prospects. 2024, 45: 101043.10.1016/j.coche.2024.101043 ↗
88. XD Wang. Piezotronic modulations in electro and photochemical catalysis. 2018, 43: 946-951.10.1557/mrs.2018.264 ↗
89. JH Liu. Piezocatalytic techniques in environmental remediation. 2023, 62: 2213927.10.1002/anie.202213927 ↗
90. J Wu. Effective enhancement of piezocatalytic activity of BaTiO 3 nanowires under ultrasonic vibration. 2018, 45: 44-51.10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.034 ↗
91. PL Wang. Impact of oxygen vacancy occupancy on piezo-catalytic activity of BaTiO 3 nanobelt. 2020, 279: 119340.10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119340 ↗
92. HS Mei. Piezoelectric ZnO nanoarrays for catalytic detection of H 2O 2 with ultra sensitivity. 2023, 122: 223701.10.1063/5.0146730 ↗
93. WN Zhao. Enhanced pizeopotential-mediated catalytic oxidation mechanism of formaldehyde and anti-deactivation performance onto ZnO surface. 2024, 353: 124057.10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124057 ↗
94. F Bossl. Importance of energy band theory and screening charge effect in piezo-electrocatalytical processes. 2023, 462: 142730.10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142730 ↗
95. S Chen. Piezocatalytic Medicine: An emerging frontier using piezoelectric materials for biomedical applications. 2023, 35: 2208256.10.1002/adma.202208256 ↗
96. N Domingo. Understanding piezocatalysis, pyrocatalysis and ferrocatalysis. 2024, 6: 1320503.10.3389/fnano.2024.1320503 ↗
97. CY Wang. Versatile Titanates: Classification, Property, Preparation, and Sustainable Energy Catalysis. 2021, 32: 2108350.10.1002/adfm.202108350 ↗
98. WQ Qian. Piezoelectric materials for controlling electrochemical processes. 2020, 12: 149.10.1007/s40820-020-00489-z ↗
99. Y Wang. Piezo-catalysis for nondestructive tooth whitening. 2020, 11: 1328.10.1038/s41467-020-15015-3 ↗
100. Y Zhang. Control of electrochemical processes using energy harvesting materials and devices. 2017, 46: 7757-7786.10.1039/C7CS00387K ↗