Optimization of the buffer surface of CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB-based magnetic tunnel junctions by ion beam milling
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Due to their high tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) ratios at room temperature, magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) with a crystalline MgO insulating barrier and CoFeB ferromagnetic (FM) layers are the best candidates for novel magnetic memory applications. To overcome impedance matching problems in electronic circuits, the MgO barrier must have an ultra-low thickness (∼1 nm). Therefore, it is mandatory to optimize the MTJ fabrication process, in order to prevent relevant defects in the MgO barrier that could affect the magnetic and electrical MTJ properties. Here, a smoothing process aiming to decrease the roughness of the buffer surface before the deposition of the full MTJ stack is proposed. An ion beam milling process was used to etch the surface of an MTJ buffer structure with a Ru top layer. The morphologic results prove an effective decrease of the Ru surface roughness with the etching time. The electrical and magnetic results obtained for MTJs with smoothed buffer structures show a direct influence of the buffer roughness and coupling field on the improvement of the TMR ratio.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · ZnO doping and properties · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Leitão · Nanotechnology · 2015 · 27 · 04550110.1088/0957-4484/27/4/045501 ↗
2. Skowroński · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 19240110.1063/1.4765350 ↗
3. Takenaga · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17E52410.1063/1.4868181 ↗
4. Zeng · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 221910.1039/c2nr33407k ↗
5. Costa · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2015 · 51 · 1
6. Ventura · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · 581910.1088/0022-3727/40/19/003 ↗
7. Kent · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 18710.1038/nnano.2015.24 ↗
8. Ikeda · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 72110.1038/nmat2804 ↗
9. Gajek · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 13240810.1063/1.3694270 ↗
10. Worledge · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 02250110.1063/1.3536482 ↗
11. Zutic · 2012 · 226
12. Shen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 18250810.1063/1.2201547 ↗
13. Hwang · Solid State Phenom. · 2007 · 121 · 86910.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.121-123.869 ↗
14. Lee · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2016 · 16 · 65410.1166/jnn.2016.11901 ↗
15. Yu · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 256 · 659210.1016/j.apsusc.2010.04.053 ↗
16. Djayaprawira · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 09250210.1063/1.1871344 ↗
17. Ikeda · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 08250810.1063/1.2976435 ↗
18. Butler · Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 9 · 01410610.1088/1468-6996/9/1/014106 ↗
19. Yuasa · Nat. Mater. · 2004 · 3 · 86810.1038/nmat1257 ↗
20. Nagamine · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 16250710.1063/1.2352046 ↗
21. Yuasa · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · R33710.1088/0022-3727/40/21/R01 ↗
22. Teixeira · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 19660110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.196601 ↗
23. Yuasa · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 2503
24. Toyoda · MRS Adv. · 2016 · 1 · 35710.1557/adv.2016.80 ↗
25. Frost · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 224026
26. Beck · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 290–291 · 110810.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.468 ↗
27. Zhang · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 394110.1016/j.tsf.2006.09.033 ↗
28. Ferreira · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 07C11710.1063/1.3678319 ↗
29. Cao · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2014 · 314 · 44310.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.015 ↗
30. Worledge · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 8410.1063/1.1590740 ↗
31. Tiusan · Eur. Phys. J. B: Condens. Matter Complex Syst. · 2002 · 26 · 431
32. Schrag · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 237310.1063/1.1315633 ↗