journal article·2019-05Open access

Rotatable magnetic anisotropy in Fe78Si9B13 thin films displaying stripe domains

Marco Coïsson, Gabriele Barrera, Federica Celegato, Paola Tiberto

Abstract

Abstract Fe78Si9B13 thin films having a controlled weak perpendicular anisotropy resulting in dense stripe domain configuration have been prepared to investigate their rotatable anisotropy properties. Vector vibrating sample magnetometry, an innovative field-dependent magnetic force microscopy, and ferromagnetic resonance techniques have been jointly exploited to correlate the perpendicular anisotropy to the threshold field value that must be overcome to induce the stripes realignment. A linear relationship between these two quantities is found. The presence of the threshold field is attributed to the portions of the samples whose magnetisation must flip its perpendicular component during a rotation process, therefore encountering the energy barrier of the perpendicular anisotropy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Cohen · J. Appl. Phys. · 1962 · 33 · 296810.1063/1.1728545 ↗
2. Lommel · J. Appl. Phys. · 1962 · 33 · 116010.1063/1.1728641 ↗
3. Saito · J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 1964 · 19 · 111610.1143/JPSJ.19.1116 ↗
4. Zhou · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 26500110.1088/0022-3727/48/26/265001 ↗
5. Hsieh · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 252 · 189910.1016/j.apsusc.2005.05.041 ↗
6. Acher · J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 81 · 405710.1063/1.364877 ↗
7. Gayen · J. All. Comp. · 2017 · 694 · 82310.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.066 ↗
8. Coïsson · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 03390210.1063/1.2960454 ↗
9. Hierro-Rodriguez · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 11720210.1103/PhysRevLett.109.117202 ↗
10. Wum · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2015 · 346 · 56710.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.010 ↗
11. Sun · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 244 · 48910.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.155 ↗
12. Barturen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 09240410.1063/1.4748122 ↗
13. Tacchi · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 02441110.1103/PhysRevB.89.024411 ↗
14. Banerjee · Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 96 · 02442110.1103/PhysRevB.96.024421 ↗
15. Cao · AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 06520210.1063/1.4983402 ↗
16. Životský · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2008 · 255 · 332210.1016/j.apsusc.2008.09.044 ↗
17. Guo · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2013 · 287 · 49910.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.041 ↗
18. Dias · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2000 · 161 · 10910.1016/S0169-4332(00)00144-6 ↗
19. McCord · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 07390310.1063/1.4792517 ↗
20. Virot · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 45 · 40500310.1088/0022-3727/45/40/405003 ↗
21. Soh · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 05390810.1063/1.4817767 ↗
22. Fin · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 22441110.1103/PhysRevB.92.224411 ↗
23. Wei · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 46500110.1088/0022-3727/48/46/465001 ↗
24. Talbi · J. Phys.: Conf. Series · 2010 · 200 · 072107
25. Tiberto · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2008 · 44 · 392110.1109/TMAG.2008.2002255 ↗
26. Svalov · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 16241010.1063/1.4704984 ↗
27. Billoni · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 18442010.1103/PhysRevB.89.184420 ↗
28. Cao · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 56 · 04030710.7567/JJAP.56.040307 ↗
29. Holzinger · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 732310.1021/acsnano.5b02283 ↗
30. Ehresmann · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 556810.1002/adma.201103264 ↗
31. Coïsson · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 32500310.1088/0022-3727/47/32/325003 ↗
32. Coïsson · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2990410.1038/srep29904 ↗
33. Camara · J. Phys.: Cond. Matter · 2017 · 29 · 465803
34. Ebels · Europhys. Lett. · 1999 · 46 · 9410.1209/epl/i1999-00566-9 ↗