journal article·2003-02

Ultra-thin titanium oxide film with a rutile-type structure

Masahiko Hiratani, Masaru Kadoshima, Tatsumi Hirano, Yasuhiro Shimamoto, Yuichi Matsui, Toshihide Nabatame, Kazuyoshi Torii, Shinichiro Kimura

Applied Surface Science· Volume 207· Issue 1-4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A titanium oxide film was deposited on a silicon substrate by RF-magnetron sputtering using a sintered oxide target in an argon-gas atmosphere. Phase transition and crystallization during the post-heat treatment were investigated. The thermodynamic stability of phase, oxygen diffusion through the film to form an interfacial SiO2 layer, and the reaction process in which the rutile-type TiO2 is crystallized were investigated. Rock-salt-type TiO with large deficiency of titanium ions is quenched in the as-deposited film in non-equilibrium. The following post-heat treatment in nitrogen gas transforms the film to Ti3O5, while post-oxidation transforms the film into rutile-type TiO2, even in an ultra-thin film of 5 nm, at the expense of the growth of interfacial SiO2 with a thickness of 2.5 nm. The growth of the interfacial oxide is explained in terms of three origins: oxygen defects incorporated into the rutile-type TiO2, fast oxygen diffusion via the defects, and the fact that non-stoichiometric TiO2 − x is less stable than SiO2. We also discuss the main criteria that must be satisfied in order to apply the high-permittivity oxide to a gate insulator.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Gusev · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 17610.1063/1.125694 ↗
2. Wilk · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 48410.1063/1.371888 ↗
3. B. He, T. Ma, S.A. Campbell, W.L. Gladfelter, Int. Electron. Devices Meet. (IEEE, San Francisco, 1998) p. 1038.
4. K. Haraguchi, K. Torii, J. Yugami, T. Onai, Ext. Abst. Solid State Devices and Mat., (JSAP, Yokohama, 1999) p. 376.
5. Hubbard · J. Mater. Res. · 1996 · 11 · 275710.1557/JMR.1996.0350 ↗
6. Alexandrov · Vacuum · 1996 · 47 · 133310.1016/S0042-207X(96)00196-0 ↗
7. L.G. Parratt, Phys. Rev. 95 (1954) 359.10.1103/PhysRev.95.359 ↗
8. Nevot · J. Rev. Phys. Appl. · 1980 · 15 · 76110.1051/rphysap:01980001503076100 ↗
9. Powder Diffraction File Release, International Center for Diffraction Data, Pennsylvania, 2000.
10. Jobin · J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 77 · 514910.1063/1.359259 ↗
11. Shannon · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1965 · 48 · 39110.1111/j.1151-2916.1965.tb14774.x ↗
12. C.R. Catlow, Nonstoichiometric Oxides, Academic Press, New York, 1981, p. 61.10.1016/B978-0-12-655280-5.50007-9 ↗
13. A.J. Bard, R. Parsons, J. Jordan, in: AJ. Bard, R. Parsons, J. Jordan (Eds.), Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1985.
14. Anderson · J. Less-Common Metals · 1970 · 22 · 21910.1016/0022-5088(70)90022-6 ↗
15. Bartholomew · J. Crystal Growth · 1970 · 6 · 24910.1016/0022-0248(70)90075-8 ↗
16. Baumard · J. Solid State Chem. · 1977 · 20 · 4310.1016/0022-4596(77)90049-4 ↗
17. Unnam · Oxid. Met. · 1986 · 26 · 23110.1007/BF00659186 ↗
18. Guha · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 271010.1063/1.1320464 ↗