The preparation and evaluation of graded multilayer ta-C films deposited by FCVA method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, a series of graded multilayer ta-C films were investigated by varying their sublayer thickness ratios, in which each film sublayer was prepared at different substrate bias by filtered cathode vacuum arc (FCVA) method. The experimental results show that the graded multilayer film structure can effectively decrease the internal stress level of deposited ta-C film, and meanwhile the graded multilayer ta-C films still have high sp 3 fractions. The applied substrate bias voltage and sublayer thickness ratio can apparently influence the microstructure characteristics and internal stress of the graded multilayer ta-C films. The graded multilayer ta-C film has larger sp 3 fraction when applying a larger negative substrate bias voltage and having a thicker outer sublayer during the film deposition process. However, the internal stress in the as-deposited film also increases with larger thickness of the outer sublayer, and the optimal ratio of sublayer thicknesses is 1:1:1:1 for graded ta-C film with four sublayers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Casiraghi · Mater. Today · 2007 · 10 · 4410.1016/S1369-7021(06)71791-6 ↗
2. Robertson · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2002 · 37 · 12910.1016/S0927-796X(02)00005-0 ↗
3. Zheng · Carbon · 2005 · 43 · 197610.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.008 ↗
4. Panwar · Thin Solid Films · 2008 · 516 · 233110.1016/j.tsf.2007.09.024 ↗
5. Akita · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2001 · 10 · 101710.1016/S0925-9635(00)00487-8 ↗
6. Xu · Philos. Mag. B · 1997 · 76 · 35110.1080/01418639708241099 ↗
7. Gioti · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 18410.1063/1.121749 ↗
8. Stuber · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 1999 · 116 · 59110.1016/S0257-8972(99)00224-8 ↗
9. Tay · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2003 · 12 · 18510.1016/S0925-9635(03)00021-9 ↗
10. Peter · Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2004 · 791 · Q5.30.1
11. Teo · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2007 · 16 · 188210.1016/j.diamond.2007.08.035 ↗
12. Teo · IEEE Sens. J. · 2008 · 8 · 61610.1109/JSEN.2008.918986 ↗
13. Teo · Thin Solid Films · 2008 · 516 · 536410.1016/j.tsf.2007.07.046 ↗
14. Han · Appl. Phys. A-Mater. · 2008 · 255 · 607
15. Tompkins · 1999
16. Casiraghi · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2004 · 13 · 141610.1016/j.diamond.2003.10.086 ↗
17. Zhu · Vacuum · 2004 · 72 · 28510.1016/j.vacuum.2003.08.005 ↗
18. Gouadec · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 2007 · 38 · 59810.1002/jrs.1749 ↗
19. Ferrari · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 61 · 1409510.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095 ↗
20. Shi · Thin Solid Films · 2000 · 366 · 16910.1016/S0040-6090(00)00732-X ↗
21. Piscaneca · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2005 · 14 · 107810.1016/j.diamond.2004.11.043 ↗
22. Liu · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2007 · 16 · 174610.1016/j.diamond.2007.06.007 ↗
23. Adamopoulos · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 1999 · 8 · 54110.1016/S0925-9635(98)00430-0 ↗
24. Robertson · Tribol. Int. · 2003 · 36 · 40510.1016/S0301-679X(02)00216-5 ↗
25. Mathioudakis · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 20520310.1103/PhysRevB.65.205203 ↗
26. Logothetidis · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1999 · 138 · 24410.1016/S0169-4332(98)00401-2 ↗
27. Gui · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2003 · 39 · 71610.1109/TMAG.2003.808999 ↗
28. Schulz · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2005 · 200 · 112310.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.02.019 ↗
29. Hooton · Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. · 2006 · 28 · 31510.1016/j.ejps.2006.03.006 ↗
30. Han · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2007 · 201 · 532310.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.025 ↗
31. Veerasamy · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 1993 · 2 · 78210.1016/0925-9635(93)90223-O ↗