rf Power dependence on the chemical and structural properties of copper oxide thin films obtained at various oxygen fractions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Copper oxide (CuOx) thin films were deposited on flexible polyethyleneterephthalate (PET) substrates by rf magnetron sputtering and the effects of the rf power and the O2 fraction on the physical and chemical properties of the films were examined. The obtained films were characterized with a surface profiler, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), four points probe, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The trend of surface resistance of CuOx films was almost identical as rf power varied from 200 to 300 W. The surface resistance of the films increased as the O2 fraction increased up to 14.3%. After this point it decreased. The propensity of surface resistance of the films, however, monotonically increased as a function of O2 fraction at 400 W of rf power. XRD study revealed that the preferential phase of CuOx changed from metallic cubic Cu(1 1 1) through cubic Cu2O(1 1 1) to monoclinic CuO( 1 ¯ 1 1 ) as the O2 fraction increased. The compositional ratio of Cu species with different oxidation state in CuOx films was investigated by X-ray induced Auger electron spectroscopy (XAES). XAES study revealed that the compositional ratio of Cu was dependent with the rf power. The higher rf power applied, the more Cu+ species and less Cu2+ species formed in CuOx films.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Li · Journal of Crystal Growth · 2009 · 311 · 110210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.11.038 ↗
2. Akimoto · Solar Energy · 2006 · 80 · 71510.1016/j.solener.2005.10.012 ↗
3. Paul · Chemical Physics Letters · 2008 · 463 · 11710.1016/j.cplett.2008.08.065 ↗
4. Balamurugan · Thin Solid Films · 2001 · 396 · 9010.1016/S0040-6090(01)01216-0 ↗
5. Mittiga · Applied Physics Letters · 2006 · 88 · 16350210.1063/1.2194315 ↗
6. Serin · Semiconductor Science and Technology · 2005 · 20 · 39810.1088/0268-1242/20/5/012 ↗
7. Yang · Applied Physics Letters · 2007 · 91 · 23290710.1063/1.2822403 ↗
8. Yoshida · Journal of Applied Physics · 2009 · 106 · 06451010.1063/1.3226880 ↗
9. Deuermeier · Journal of Applied Physics · 2011 · 109 · 11370410.1063/1.3592981 ↗
10. Serin · Semiconductor Science and Technology · 2005 · 20 · 39810.1088/0268-1242/20/5/012 ↗
11. Nair · Applied Surface Science · 1999 · 150 · 14310.1016/S0169-4332(99)00239-1 ↗
12. Rakhshani · Solid-State Electronics · 1986 · 29 · 710.1016/0038-1101(86)90191-7 ↗
13. Izhizuka · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2001 · 40 · 276510.1143/JJAP.40.2765 ↗
14. Jayatissa · Applied Surface Science · 2009 · 255 · 947410.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.072 ↗
15. Ahn · Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells · 2007 · 91 · 183610.1016/j.solmat.2007.06.014 ↗
16. Lotus · Materials Science and Engineering B · 2010 · 166 · 6110.1016/j.mseb.2009.10.001 ↗
17. Espitia-Cabrera · Surface and Coatings Technology · 2008 · 203 · 21110.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.08.051 ↗
18. Li · Energy and Fuels · 2009 · 23 · 296710.1021/ef9001007 ↗
19. Chu · Physica B · 2009 · 404 · 483110.1016/j.physb.2009.08.185 ↗
20. Ai · Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2009 · 113 · 2089610.1021/jp9083647 ↗
21. Lee · Applied Surface Science · 2003 · 206 · 10210.1016/S0169-4332(02)01239-4 ↗