Policy Decision Support for Renewables Deployment through Spatially Explicit Practically Optimal Alternatives
Source abstract
Abstract
Summary Designing highly renewable power systems involves a number of contested decisions, such as where to locate generation and transmission capacity. Yet, it is common to use a single result from a cost-minimizing energy system model to inform planning. This neglects many more alternative results, which might, for example, avoid problematic concentrations of technology capacity in any one region. To explore such alternatives, we develop a method to generate spatially explicit, practically optimal results (SPORES). Applying SPORES to Italy, we find that only photovoltaic and storage technologies are vital components for decarbonizing the power system by 2050; other decisions, such as locating wind power, allow flexibility of choice. Most alternative configurations are insensitive to cost and demand uncertainty, while dealing with adverse weather requires excess renewable generation and storage capacities. For policymakers, the approach can provide spatially detailed power system transformation options that enable decisions that are socially and politically acceptable.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Integrated Energy Systems Optimization · Smart Grid Energy Management · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Masson-Delmotte
2. Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes10.1073/pnas.1510028112 ↗
3. Impacts of inter-annual wind and solar variations on the European power system10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.020 ↗
4. Response to ‘burden of proof: a comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems’10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.113 ↗
5. How modelers construct energy costs: discursive elements in energy system and integrated assessment models10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.021 ↗
6. Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003 ↗
7. Macro-energy systems: toward a new discipline10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.017 ↗
8. Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition?10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.038 ↗
9. Impact of myopic decision-making and disruptive events in power systems planning10.1038/s41560-018-0159-3 ↗
10. What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved?10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.012 ↗
11. Democratizing expertise and environmental governance: different approaches to the politics of science and their relevance for policy analysis10.1080/1523908X.2014.914894 ↗
12. Using modeling to generate alternatives (MGA) to expand our thinking on energy futures10.1016/j.eneco.2010.05.002 ↗
13. A review of approaches to uncertainty assessment in energy system optimization models10.1016/j.esr.2018.06.003 ↗
14. Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.001 ↗
15. Ensuring diversity of national energy scenarios: bottom-up energy system model with modeling to generate alternatives10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.043 ↗
16. Modelling to generate alternatives with an energy system optimization model10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.019 ↗
17. Modelling to generate alternatives: a technique to explore uncertainty in energy-environment-economy models10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.065 ↗
18. The near-optimal feasible space of a renewable power system model
19. The role of firm low-carbon electricity resources in deep decarbonization of power generation10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.006 ↗
20. Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.222 ↗
21. Efficient and equitable spatial allocation of renewable power plants at the country scale10.1038/nenergy.2017.124 ↗
22. Calliope: a multi-scale energy systems modelling framework10.21105/joss.00825 ↗
23. Gestore dei Servizi
24. Terna (Italian TSO)
25. Decomposing public support for energy policy: what drives acceptance of and intentions to protest against renewable energy expansion in Germany?10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.004 ↗
26. Opposition “overblown”? Community response to wind energy siting in the Western United States10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.016 ↗
27. Why distributed?: A critical review of the tradeoffs between centralized and decentralized resources10.1109/MPE.2018.2885203 ↗
28. Stigler
29. Efficiency of superconducting transmission lines: an analysis with respect to the load factor and capacity rating10.1016/j.epsr.2016.07.007 ↗
30. Electricity transmission
31. Net-zero emissions energy systems10.1126/science.aas9793 ↗
32. Techno-economic assessment of CO2 direct air capture plants10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.086 ↗
33. Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.029 ↗
34. Public estimates of support for offshore wind energy: false consensus, pluralistic ignorance, and partisan effects10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.005 ↗
35. Identifying and analyzing barriers to offshore wind power development in China using the grey decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.002 ↗
36. Getting to zero carbon emissions in the electric power sector10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.013 ↗
37. Balancing Europe’s wind power output through spatial deployment informed by weather regimes10.1038/nclimate3338 ↗
38. Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies10.1038/s41467-019-13067-8 ↗
39. Comparison and interactions between the long-term pursuit of energy independence and climate policies10.1038/nenergy.2016.73 ↗
40. Modeling the low-carbon transition of the European energy system - A quantitative assessment of the stranded assets problem10.1016/j.esr.2019.100422 ↗
41. Renewables, nuclear, or fossil fuels? Scenarios for Great Britain’s power system considering costs, emissions and energy security10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.102 ↗
42. Lombardi · 2019
43. Sparber, W., Moser, D., Manzolini, G., and Prina, M.G. (2017). Renewable energy high penetration scenarios using multi-nodes approach: analysis for the Italian case. 33rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, pp. 2164–2170.
44. Modelling the integrated power and transport energy system: the role of power-to-gas and hydrogen in long-term scenarios for Italy10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.089 ↗
45. The shape of future electricity demand: exploring load curves in 2050s Germany and Britain10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.082 ↗
46. Terna (Italian TSO)
47. A multi-layer energy modelling methodology to assess the impact of heat-electricity integration strategies: the case of the residential cooking sector in Italy10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.004 ↗
48. Sustainability guardrails for energy scenarios of the global energy transition10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.079 ↗
49. Virdis
50. The future cost of electrical energy storage based on experience rates10.1038/nenergy.2017.110 ↗
51. Renewable Power-to-Gas: a technological and economic review10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066 ↗
52. A process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 ↗
53. Projecting cost development for future large-scale power-to-gas implementations by scaling effects10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114780 ↗
54. Power-to-gas: electrolysis and methanation status review10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.030 ↗
55. Production costs for synthetic methane in 2030 and 2050 of an optimized power-to-gas plant with intermediate hydrogen storage10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113594 ↗
56. Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: a review10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 ↗
57. Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.060 ↗
58. Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068 ↗
59. Home-made or imported: on the possibility for renewable electricity autarky on all scales in Europe10.1016/j.esr.2019.100388 ↗