Atomic force measurements of 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid and its salt with CH3, OH, and CONHCH3 functionalized self-assembled monolayers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Chemical and mechanical properties of different compounds can be elucidated by measuring fundamental forces such as adhesion, attraction and repulsion, between modified surfaces by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM) in force mode calibration. This work presents a combination of AFM, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), and crystallization techniques to study the forces of interaction between excipients and active ingredients used in pharmaceutical formulations. SAMs of 16-mercaptohexadecanoate, which represent magnesium stereate, were used to modify the probe tip, whereas CH 3 -, OH- and CONHCH 3 -functional SAMs were formed on a gold-coated mica substrate, and used as examples of the surfaces of lactose and theophylline. The crystals of lactose and theophylline were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The modification of gold surfaces with 16-mercaptohexadecanoate, 10-mercapto-1-decanol (OH-functional SAM), 1-decanethiol (CH 3 -functional) and N -methyl-11-mercaptoundecanamide (CONHCH 3 -functional SAM) was studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) in specular reflectance mode. XPS and AES results of the modified surfaces showed the presence of sulfur binding, and kinetic energies that correspond to the presence of 10-mercapto-1-decanol, 1-decanethiol, N -methyl-11-mercaptoundecanamide and the salt of 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid. The absorption bands in the IR spectra further confirm the modification of the gold-coated substrates with these compounds. Force versus distance measurements were performed between the modified tip and the modified gold-coated mica substrates. The mean adhesion forces between the COO − Ca 2+ functionalized tip and the CH 3 -, OH-, and CONHCH 3 -modified substrates were determined to be 4.5, 8.9 and 6.3 nN, respectively. The magnitude of the adhesion force (ion–dipole) interaction between the modified tip and substrate decreases in the following order: COO − Ca 2+ /OH > COO − Ca 2+ /CONHCH 3 > COO − Ca 2+ /CH 3 .
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Brittain · Pharm. Technol. · 1993 · 66
2. Whitesides · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1989 · 111 · 32110.1021/ja00183a049 ↗
3. Porter · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1987 · 355910.1021/ja00246a011 ↗
4. Shimazu · Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. · 1994 · 67 · 86310.1246/bcsj.67.863 ↗
5. Walezak · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1991 · 113 · 237010.1021/ja00007a004 ↗
6. Laibinis · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1992 · 112 · 199010.1021/ja00032a009 ↗
7. His · Langmuir · 1994 · 10 · 73410.1021/la00015a023 ↗
8. Laibinis · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1992 · 114 · 902210.1021/ja00049a038 ↗
9. Ulman · Mater. Educ. · 1989 · 11 · 20
10. Laibinis · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1991 · 113 · 715210.1021/ja00019a011 ↗
11. Walezak · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1991 · 113 · 237010.1021/ja00007a004 ↗
12. Sagiv · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1980 · 102 · 9210.1021/ja00521a016 ↗
13. Le Grange · Langmuir · 1993 · 9 · 174910.1021/la00031a023 ↗
14. Maoz · J. Coll. Interf. Sci. · 1984 · 100 · 46510.1016/0021-9797(84)90452-1 ↗
15. Gun · J. Coll. Interf. Sci. · 1986 · 112 · 45710.1016/0021-9797(86)90114-1 ↗
16. Gun · J. Coll. Interf. Sci. · 1984 · 101 · 20110.1016/0021-9797(84)90020-1 ↗
17. Tillman · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1988 · 110 · 613610.1021/ja00226a031 ↗
18. Brandiss · Langmuir · 1993 · 9 · 123210.1021/la00029a014 ↗
19. Mathauser · Langmuir · 1993 · 9 · 300210.1021/la00035a044 ↗
20. Mathauser · Langmuir · 1993 · 9 · 344610.1021/la00036a019 ↗
21. Kessel · Langmuir · 1991 · 7 · 53210.1021/la00051a020 ↗
22. Schwartz · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 69 · 335410.1103/PhysRevLett.69.3354 ↗
23. Nuzzo · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1987 · 109 · 73310.1021/ja00237a017 ↗
24. Laibiinis · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1991 · 113 · 715210.1021/ja00019a011 ↗
25. Whitesides · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1988 · 110 · 65560
26. Nuzzo · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1990 · 112 · 55810.1021/ja00158a012 ↗
27. Bard · Langmuir · 1998 · 14 · 4770
28. Noy · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1995 · 117 · 794310.1021/ja00135a012 ↗
29. van der Vegte · Langmuir · 1997 · 13 · 435710.1021/la970025k ↗
30. Williams · Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 129110.1021/la950500j ↗
31. Wenzler · Anal. Chem. · 1997 · 69 · 285510.1021/ac961065g ↗
32. Stevens · Langmuir · 1999 · 15 · 20710.1021/la980683k ↗
33. Bain · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1989 · 111 · 32110.1021/ja00183a049 ↗
34. Troughton · Langmuir · 1988 · 4 · 36510.1021/la00080a021 ↗
35. Sader · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1995 · 66 · 378910.1063/1.1145439 ↗
36. van der Vegte · Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 324910.1021/la990911q ↗