journal article·2015-08

The formation mechanisms of surface nanocrystallites in β-type biomedical TiNbZrFe alloy by surface mechanical attrition treatment

Lei Jin, Wenfang Cui, Xiu Song, Lian Zhou

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A nanostructured surface layer was successfully performed on a biomedical β-type TiNbZrFe alloy by surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT). The results reveal that the surface layer along the depth from treated surface to strain-free matrix could be divided into an outer nanocrystalline layer (0–30 μm), a high-density dislocation region (30–200 μm) and an inner region with low-density dislocations and twins (200–700 μm) when the surface was treated for 60 min. The microhardness of the surface layer is enhanced and increases with increasing treatment time. Although the {1 1 2} 〈1 1 1〉 twin coordinates the deformations with dislocations, this coordination only occurs in the low strain area and cannot affect the nanocrystalline formation. The self-nanocrystallization of TiNbZrFe alloy is mainly attributed to dislocation movements. First, the dislocations start to move and easily form dislocation bands along certain crystal directions; then, multiple slips of dislocations gradually form dislocation tangles; after that, high-density dislocation tangles increases, which divides primary grains into many small domain areas. As high strain energies accumulate on the interfaces among these areas, the lattice rotation can be driven between the adjacent small domain areas, finally resulting in a large number of nanocrystalline regions with low or large angle grain boundaries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Kuroda · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1998 · 243 · 24410.1016/S0921-5093(97)00808-3 ↗
2. Neelakantan · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 590 · 14010.1016/j.msea.2013.10.003 ↗
3. Liu · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2004 · 47 · 4910.1016/j.mser.2004.11.001 ↗
4. Vasilescu · Corros. Sci. · 2012 · 65 · 43110.1016/j.corsci.2012.08.042 ↗
5. Li · Wear · 2004 · 257 · 86910.1016/j.wear.2004.04.001 ↗
6. Cui · Mater. Sci. Eng. C · 2013 · 33 · 377510.1016/j.msec.2013.05.011 ↗
7. Saldaña · Acta Biomater. · 2010 · 6 · 164910.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.033 ↗
8. Kim · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2012 · 258 · 208310.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.051 ↗
9. Choe · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2013 · 228 · S47010.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.018 ↗
10. Cui · J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. · 2012 · 8 · 17810.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.004 ↗
11. Samih · Mater. Charact. · 2013 · 83 · 12910.1016/j.matchar.2013.06.006 ↗
12. Darling · Scripta Mater. · 2013 · 69 · 46110.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.036 ↗
13. Hu · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2010 · 205 · 50610.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.023 ↗
14. Wen · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2007 · 7 · 240010.1021/cg070428a ↗
15. Wang · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 176210.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.016 ↗
16. Zhang · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 187110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00594-3 ↗
17. Chang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 530 · 30410.1016/j.msea.2011.09.090 ↗
18. Zhu · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 410110.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.023 ↗
19. Lu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2004 · 375-377 · 3810.1016/j.msea.2003.10.261 ↗
20. Cullity · 1956