Effectiveness and harmful effects of removal sulphated black crust from granite using Nd:YAG nanosecond pulsed laser
Source abstract
Abstract
Sulphated black crust is a common form of deterioration affecting stone used in monuments, usually occurs in contaminated atmospheres or urban environments. Its origin and cleaning have been studied extensively, for decades, in the case of carbonate rocks. Recent studies show that this form of alteration also affects granites. Scientific research on laser removal effectiveness of gypsum-rich black crust on granites needs to be scientifically addressed considering the inexistent references. This paper assesses the removal by laser of sulphate-rich black crusts on granite using the different harmonics of a Nd:YAG nanosecond pulsed laser (266 nm, 355 nm, 532 nm and 1064 nm). Effectiveness was evaluated using Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (SEM–EDS), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Attenuated Total Reflection-Fourier Infrared Transform Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). We also evaluated the effect of the radiation on granite-forming minerals and on the colour of the stone using Scanning Electron Microscopy and spectrophotometry colour measurements respectively. SEM–EDS, XRD and ATR-FTIR analyses show that the higher the wavelength, the more efficient the cleaning, so samples cleaned using 1064 nm pulsed laser recovered its original colour. Nevertheless, the Nd:YAG laser did not completely eliminate the crust, and gypsum crystals remaining on the rock surface are observed, even at the most effective wavelength.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Conservation Techniques and Studies · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Acid deposition and the deterioration of stone: a brief review of a broad topic10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.205.01.28 ↗
2. Assessment of the state of conservation of Stone artworks after laser cleaning: comparison with conventional cleaning results on a two-decade follow up10.1016/S1296-2074(00)01094-3 ↗
3. Comparative study of different wavelengths from IR to UV applied to clean sandstone10.1016/S0169-4332(99)00561-9 ↗
4. Comparative study on the application of the 1st and the 3rd harmonic of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser system to clean black encrustation on marble10.1016/S1296-2074(02)01208-6 ↗
5. Laser yellowing: myth or reality?10.1016/S1296-2074(02)01203-7 ↗
6. Comparative study of dark patinas on granitic outcrops and buildings10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.002 ↗
7. Origin of gypsum-rich coatings on historic buildings10.1007/s11270-009-0025-9 ↗
8. Removal of graffiti from the mortar by using Q-switched Nd:YAG laser10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.04.030 ↗
9. Role of marble microstructure in near-infrared laser-induced damage during laser cleaning10.1063/1.1649811 ↗
10. Comparative study between IR and UV laser radiation applied to the removal of graffitis on urban buildings10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.04.051 ↗
11. Nd:YVO4 laser removal of graffiti from granite. Influence of paint and rock properties on cleaning efficacy10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.110 ↗
12. CIE S 014-4/E:2007 · 2001
13. Socrates · 2001
14. Comparative study of ornamental granite cleaning using femtosecond and nanosecond pulsed lasers10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.038 ↗