journal article·2006-03

Chemical bonding and electronic structures at magnesium/copper phthalocyanine interfaces

J.X. Tang, C.S. Lee, S.T. Lee

Applied Surface Science· Volume 252· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Chemistry, electronic structure and electrical behavior at the interfaces between copper phthalocyanine (CuPc) and Mg with a reverse formation sequence were investigated using X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS), ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy (UPS), and current–voltage ( I – V ) measurements. A chemical reaction occurs between CuPc and Mg irrespective of the deposition sequence. Despite having different reaction zone thicknesses, both the CuPc-on-Mg and the Mg-on-CuPc interfaces exhibit chemistry-induced gap states and identical carrier injection barriers, which are confirmed by the symmetric electrical behavior obtained from I – V characteristics of devices with a structure of Mg/CuPc/Mg. These findings contrast with those expected from physisorptive noble metal–CuPc interfaces and suggest that strong local chemical bonding is a primary factor determining molecular level alignment at reactive metal–CuPc interfaces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Tang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1987 · 51 · 91310.1063/1.98799 ↗
3. Dimitrakopoulos · Adv. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 9910.1002/1521-4095(20020116)14:2<99::AID-ADMA99>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
4. Bao · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 306610.1063/1.116841 ↗
5. Peumans · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 369310.1063/1.1534621 ↗
6. Tang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1986 · 48 · 18310.1063/1.96937 ↗
7. Wang · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 152910.1021/jp0361733 ↗
8. VanSlyke · App. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 216010.1063/1.117151 ↗
9. Hung · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 74 · 320910.1063/1.124107 ↗
10. Pathasarathy · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 72 · 213810.1063/1.121301 ↗
11. Peisert · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 487210.1063/1.1459620 ↗
12. Shen · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 454910.1063/1.1406967 ↗
13. Hung · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 86 · 460710.1063/1.371410 ↗
14. Hung · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 373210.1063/1.1374998 ↗
15. Shen · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 623610.1063/1.1419263 ↗
16. Schwieger · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 15520710.1103/PhysRevB.66.155207 ↗
17. Mason · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 275610.1063/1.1324681 ↗
18. Gao · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 380 · 45110.1016/j.cplett.2003.09.012 ↗
19. Shen · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 44910.1063/1.1333740 ↗
20. Li · J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 1993 · 63 · 25310.1016/0368-2048(93)87007-M ↗
21. Li · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 414810.1063/1.1426260 ↗
22. Schwieger · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 50010.1063/1.1595151 ↗
23. Tung · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 607810.1103/PhysRevLett.84.6078 ↗