Early precipitation stages of aluminum alloys—The role of quenched-in vacancies
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We present preliminary results on the structure of nano-sized particles (clusters of solute atoms or Guinier-Preston-Bagaryatsky (GPB) zones) in aluminum alloys. Hindering the motion of dislocations, these GPB zones (precipitates) are responsible for the strength of AlCuMg-alloys – used e.g. as AA2024 – for the outer shell plates in aircraft industry. We will discuss the role of quenched-in vacancies for the formation and growth of the precipitates. Using positron annihilation (Doppler broadening together with the recently developed tool of high-momentum analysis (HMA)) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements, we are able to characterize the local atomic environment in the vicinity of vacancies and selected elements (Cu) forming the precipitates. The interpretation will be based on a comparison to numerical calculations of positron lifetimes and momentum distributions as well as simulated X-ray absorption spectra. Often reliable numerical calculations of experimental quantities are possible only if relaxed atomic positions – calculated employing an ab-initio code like SIESTA – are used as input.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Muon and positron interactions and applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Dlubek · Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) · 1979 · 55 · 50910.1002/pssa.2210550218 ↗
2. Dupasquier · J. Phys.: Condens. Mater. · 1998 · 10 · 1040910.1088/0953-8984/10/46/009 ↗
3. Dupasquier · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 470710.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.004 ↗
4. Guinier · Annales de Physique (Paris) · 1938 · 12 · 161
5. Preston · Phil. Mag. · 1938 · 26 · 85510.1080/14786443808562177 ↗
6. Haasen · 1984
7. Williams · 1994 · 197
8. Fontaine · Phil. Mag. · 1979 · B40 · 1710.1080/01418637908226489 ↗
9. Lengeler · Phys. Rev. · 1980 · B21 · 450710.1103/PhysRevB.21.4507 ↗
10. Staab · Phys. Stat. Sol. (rapid research letters) · 2007 · 1 · 17210.1002/pssr.200701090 ↗
11. Ankudinov · Phys. Rev. · 1998 · B58 · 756510.1103/PhysRevB.58.7565 ↗
12. Puska · J. Phys. F: Metal. Phys. · 1983 · 13 · 33310.1088/0305-4608/13/2/009 ↗
13. Alatalo · Phys. Rev. · 1996 · B54 · 239710.1103/PhysRevB.54.2397 ↗
14. Soler · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 274510.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗
15. Haaks · Phys. Stat. Sol. · 2005 · 202 · R3810.1002/pssa.200510004 ↗
16. Haaks · Nucl. Inst. Meth. · 2006 · A569 · 82910.1016/j.nima.2006.08.117 ↗
17. Janssen · Z. Anorg. Allg. Chemie · 1999 · 629 · 170110.1002/zaac.200300134 ↗
18. Hohenberg · Phys. Rev. · 1964 · 136 · B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
19. Kohn · Phys. Rev. · 1965 · 140 · A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
20. Monkhorst · Phys. Rev. · 1976 · B13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
21. Modrow · Phys. Rev. · 2003 · B67 · 03512310.1103/PhysRevB.67.035123 ↗
22. Wang · Int. Mater. Rev. · 2005 · 50 · 19310.1179/174328005X14357 ↗
23. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2004 · A386 · 15610.1016/S0921-5093(04)00913-X ↗
24. Staab · J. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 35 · 466710.1023/A:1004838619943 ↗