Surface roughness and morphology of dental nanocomposites polished by four different procedures evaluated by a multifractal approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this study was to determine the effect of different dental polishing methods on surface texture parameters of dental nanocomposites. The 3-D surface morphology was investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and multifractal analysis. Two representative dental resin-based nanocomposites were investigated: a nanofilled and a nanohybrid composite. The samples were polished by two dental polishing protocols using multi-step and one-step system. Both protocols were then followed by diamond paste polishing. The 3-D surface roughness of samples was studied by AFM on square areas of topography on the 80 × 80 μm2 scanning area. The multifractal spectrum theory based on computational algorithms was applied for AFM data and multifractal spectra were calculated. The generalized dimension Dq and the singularity spectrum f(α) provided quantitative values that characterize the local scale properties of dental nanocomposites polished by four different dental polishing protocols at nanometer scale. The results showed that the larger the spectrum width Δα (Δα = αmax − αmin) of the multifractal spectra f(α), the more non-uniform was the surface morphology. Also, the 3-D surface topography was described by statistical parameters, according to ISO 25178-2:2012. The 3-D surface of samples had a multifractal nature. Nanofilled composite had lower values of height parameters than nanohybrid composites, due to its composition. Multi-step polishing protocol created a better finished surface, for both tested materials, than one-step polishing protocol, even when it was followed by diamond paste polishing. Diamond paste polishing created smooth surface and reduced roughness of tested materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Nanotechnology and dentistry
2. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials
3. Nanoparticles for dental materials: synthesis, analysis and applications
4. Current practicality of nanotechnology in dentistry. Part I: Focus on nanocomposite restoratives and biomimetics10.2147/CCIDE.S7722 ↗
5. Update of dental nanocomposites10.1177/0022034510363765 ↗
6. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: the impact of dry and wet cycling pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength10.1016/j.dental.2008.06.003 ↗
7. Influence of nano- and micro-filler proportions on the optical property stability of experimental dental resin composites10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.019 ↗
8. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.006 ↗
9. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites10.4103/0972-0707.62637 ↗
10. Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.014 ↗
11. Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.007 ↗
12. CBCT: facilitating comprehensive, high-tech diagnostics
13. Kirpa · 2011
14. Canal shaping with WaveOne primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.040 ↗
15. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems
16. The nature and effects of composite polishing pastes10.1016/0300-5712(89)90174-7 ↗
17. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resin10.1067/mpr.2002.129335 ↗
18. Finishing and polishing. Using the best tool to achieve natural-looking results
19. Fractal analysis of image structures
20. Mathematical methods used in monofractal and multifractal analysis for the processing of biological and medical data and images
21. Texture analysis methods for the characterisation of biological and medical images
22. The effect of contour angle on fractal dimension measurements for brittle materials10.1023/A:1017948409986 ↗
23. Accuracy and precision of fractal dimension measured on model surfaces10.1016/j.dental.2013.11.015 ↗
24. Fractals in dentistry10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.010 ↗
25. The possibility of digital imaging in the diagnosis of occlusal caries10.1155/2010/860515 ↗
26. Fractal analysis of mandibular trabecular bone: optimal tile sizes for the tile counting method10.5624/isd.2011.41.2.71 ↗
27. Changes in the fractal dimension, feret diameter, and lacunarity of mandibular alveolar bone during initial healing of dental implants
28. Evaluation of scaling and root planning effect in generalized chronic periodontitis by fractal and multifractal analysis10.1111/jre.12093 ↗
29. A fractal dimensional approach to successful evaluation of apical healing10.1111/iej.12020 ↗
30. Fracture surface examination of dental ceramics using fractal analysis10.1016/j.dental.2004.12.002 ↗
31. Atomic force microscopy in vitro study of surface roughness and fractal character of a dental restoration composite after air-polishing10.1186/1475-925X-9-59 ↗
32. Fractal analysis: a novel method to assess roughness organization of implant surface topography
33. Fractal patterns applied to implant surface: definitions and perspectives10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00081 ↗
34. Fractal analysis of heterogeneous polymer networks formed by photopolymerization of dental dimethacrylates10.1016/j.dental.2012.03.015 ↗
35. Determination of surface roughness and topography of dental resin-based nanocomposites using AFM analysis10.17305/bjbms.2013.2417 ↗
36. Effect of diamond paste finishing on AFM surface texture parameters and topography of dental nanocomposites polished by two different procedures
37. A program for fractal and multifractal analysis of two-dimensional binary images: computer algorithms versus mathematical theory10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.03.023 ↗
38. Some problems in multifractal spectrum computation using a statistical method10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/084 ↗
39. Multifractal characterization of a dental restorative composite after air-polishing10.1016/j.chaos.2014.11.009 ↗
40. Multifractal characterization of single wall carbon nanotube thin films surface upon exposure to optical parametric oscillator laser irradiation10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.114 ↗
41. Multifractal characterization of unworn hydrogel contact lens surfaces10.1002/pen.23650 ↗
42. Multifractal characterization of water soluble copper phthalocyanine based films surfaces10.1007/s13391-013-3270-4 ↗
43. Properties of sialon ceramics evaluated by means of multifractal, surface stereometry and quantitative fractography techniques10.1016/j.matchar.2009.02.013 ↗
44. Direct determination of the f(alpha) singularity spectrum10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1327 ↗
45. ISO 25178-2:2012 Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Surface texture: Areal – Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters, 2012, http://www.iso.org (accessed 10.12.14).
46. Influence of polishing instruments on the surface texture of resin composites
47. Surface finish of resin-modified and highly viscous glass ionomer cements produced by new one-step systems
48. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing10.2341/06-9 ↗
49. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.005 ↗
50. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.011 ↗
51. Do nanofill or submicron composites show improved smoothness and gloss? A systematic review of in vitro studies10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.001 ↗
52. The areal field parameters