The influence of instrumental parameters on the adhesion force in a flat-on-rough contact geometry
Source abstract
Abstract
We have used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to measure the snap-off forces between a micron sized flat silicon AFM tip and a rough Si(0 0 1) surface. The current paper is a natural continuation of our previous paper (Çolak et al., 2014), dealing with snap-off forces between an identical flat tip and flat Si(0 0 1). Within the applied experimental parameter windows we observed no dependence of the snap-off forces on the applied normal loads (3-18 μN) and residence times (0.5-35 s) for the current flat-on-rough geometry as was the case for the former flat-on-flat geometry. The snap-off forces were found to increase with relative humidity in both geometries. As in the case of the flat-on-flat contact geometry, a strong dependence of the snap-off forces on the retraction speed of the tip was observed. Here, we find a strong decrease of the snap-off forces with increasing tip speed, especially at low velocities in the range 40-1000 nm/s for the flat-on-rough geometry. This is in contrast with the flat-on-flat geometry, where we found a strong increase of the snap-off force with increasing tip speed. These observations are explained in terms of a cross-over of the importance of capillary forces and viscous forces. We suggest that the relative importance of both forces can be checked via variation of the tip speed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. The influence of instrumental parameters on the adhesion force in a flat-on-flat contact geometry10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.118 ↗
2. An in situ ellipsometric study of aqueous NH4OH treatment of silicon10.1149/1.2096794 ↗
3. HF- and NH4OH-treated (111)Si surfaces studied by spectroscopic ellipsometry10.1063/1.352950 ↗
4. Surface forces, deformation and adherence at metal microcontacts10.1016/0001-6160(84)90078-6 ↗
5. Mechanics of adhesion10.1016/S0301-679X(98)00060-7 ↗
6. AFM study of adhesion between polystyrene particles – the influence of relative humidity and applied load10.1016/j.powtec.2006.10.017 ↗
7. Surface adhesion and its dependence on surface roughness and humidity measured with a flat tip10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.138 ↗
8. Howatson · 1972 · 41
9. Exceptional plasticity of silicon nanobridges10.1088/0957-4484/22/35/355704 ↗
10. Adhesion experiments using an AFM-parameters of influence10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.06.031 ↗
11. The effect of indenter geometry on the elastic response to indentation10.1088/0022-3727/27/6/013 ↗
12. Effect of contact geometry on the pull-off force evaluated under high-vacuum and humid atmospheric conditions10.1021/la702513r ↗
13. Wetting and capillary phenomena of water on mica10.1021/jp972289l ↗
14. Adhesion forces measured by atomic force microscopy in humid air10.1021/ac991198c ↗
15. Influence of roughness on capillary forces between hydrophilic surfaces10.1103/PhysRevE.78.031606 ↗
16. Meniscus and viscous forces during separation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces with liquid-mediated contact10.1016/j.mser.2007.03.003 ↗
17. Influence of liquid meniscus on surface forces10.3103/S1068366607010035 ↗
18. Experimental evidence for ice formation at room temperature10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.036101 ↗
19. Adhesion forces between glass and silicon surfaces in air studied by AFM: effects of relative humidity, particle size, roughness, and surface treatment10.1021/la0259196 ↗
20. Microparticle adhesion studies by atomic force microscopy10.1163/156856102760136418 ↗