journal article·2000-04Open access

Force–distance studies with piezoelectric tuning forks below 4.2 K

J Rychen, T Ihn, P Studerus, A Herrmann, K Ensslin, H.J Hug, P.J.A van Schendel, H.J Güntherodt

Applied Surface Science· Volume 157· Issue 4

Abstract

Piezoelectric quartz tuning forks have been employed as the force sensor in a dynamic mode scanning force microscope operating at temperatures down to 1.7 K at He-gas pressures of typically 5 mbar. An electrochemically etched tungsten tip glued to one of the tuning fork prongs acts as the local force sensor. Its oscillation amplitude can be tuned between a few angstroms and tens of nanometers. Quality factors of up to 120000 allow a very accurate measurement of small frequency shifts. Three calibration procedures are compared which allow the determination of the proportionality constant between frequency shift and local force gradient based on the harmonic oscillator model and on electrostatic forces. The calibrated sensor is then used for a study of the interaction between the tip and a HOPG substrate. Force gradient and dissipated power can be recorded simultane-ously. It is found that during approaching the tip to the sample considerable power starts to be dissipated although the force gradient is still negative, i.e. the tip is still in the attractive regime. This observation concurs with experiments with true atomic resolution which seem to require the same tip-sample separation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Binnig · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1986 · 56 · 93010.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930 ↗
2. Giessibl · Science · 1995 · 267 · 6810.1126/science.267.5194.68 ↗
3. Güthner · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 1996 · 14 · 242810.1116/1.588873 ↗
4. Lüthi · Z. Phys. B · 1996 · 100 · 16510.1007/s002570050106 ↗
5. Erlandsson · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · R830910.1103/PhysRevB.54.R8309 ↗
6. Kitamura · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 35 · L66810.1143/JJAP.35.L668 ↗
7. Allers · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1999 · 140 · 24710.1016/S0169-4332(98)00535-2 ↗
8. Günther · Appl. Phys. B · 1989 · 48 · 8910.1007/BF00694423 ↗
9. Karrai · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1989 · 66 · 184210.1063/1.113340 ↗
10. Edwards · J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 82 · 98010.1063/1.365936 ↗
11. Giessibl · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 395610.1063/1.122948 ↗
12. Todorovic · J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 83 · 622910.1063/1.367642 ↗
13. Rychen · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1999 · 70 · 276510.1063/1.1149842 ↗
14. J. Rychen, T. Ihn, P. Studerus, A. Herrmann, K. Ensslin, H.J. Hug, P.J.A. van Schendel, H.J. Güntherodt, submitted to Rev. Sci. Instrum.
15. Giessibl · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 56 · 1601010.1103/PhysRevB.56.16010 ↗
16. Hölscher · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1999 · 140 · 34410.1016/S0169-4332(98)00552-2 ↗