journal article·2007-04

Laser removal of loose uranium compound contamination from metal surfaces

D.E. Roberts, T.S. Modise

Applied Surface Science· Volume 253· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Pulsed laser removal of surface contamination of uranyl nitrate and uranium dioxide from stainless steel has been studied. Most of the loosely bound contamination has been removed at fluence levels below 0.5 J cm−2, leaving about 5% fixed contamination for uranyl nitrate and 15% for uranium dioxide. Both alpha and beta activities are then sufficiently low that contaminated objects can be taken out of a restricted radiation area for re-use. The ratio of beta to alpha activity is found to be a function of particle size and changes during laser removal. In a separate experiment using technetium-99m, the collection of removed radioactivity in the filter was studied and an inventory made of removed and collected contamination.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma · Laser Material Processing Techniques · Laser Design and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Nicholls · S. Afr. J. Sci. · 2002 · 98
2. Ahearne · Phys. Today · 1997 · 2410.1063/1.881763 ↗
3. NEA Task Group on Decontamination, NEA report 1707, 1999. www.nea.fr/html/rwm/reports/1999/decontec.pdf.
4. Hirabayashi · Proc. SPIE · 2000 · 3887 · 9410.1117/12.375208 ↗
5. Sentis · Quant. Electr. · 2000 · 30 · 49510.1070/QE2000v030n06ABEH001750 ↗
6. Delaporte · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 208/209 · 29810.1016/S0169-4332(02)01360-0 ↗
7. Spencer · 1996 · 235
8. Steglich · 1998 · 24
9. Miljanic · Proc. SPIE · 2000 · 3887 · 35710.1117/12.375205 ↗
10. Edelson · 2000 · 768
11. Edelson · 2001
12. Geister · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1990 · 56 · 50910.1063/1.102751 ↗
13. Boughaba · 1999 · 297
14. Tam · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1998 · 127–129 · 72110.1016/S0169-4332(97)00788-5 ↗
15. Mann · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1996 · 96–98 · 46310.1016/0169-4332(95)00459-9 ↗
16. Tam · J. Appl. Phys. · 1992 · 71 · 351510.1063/1.350906 ↗
17. Leiderer · Proc. SPIE · 1998 · 3274 · 6810.1117/12.309495 ↗
18. Lu · Proc. SPIE · 1998 · 3618 · 710.1117/12.317931 ↗
19. Luk’yanchuk · Proc. SPIE · 2002 · 4426 · 28410.1117/12.456851 ↗
20. Mosbacher · Proc. SPIE · 2002 · 4426 · 30810.1117/12.456821 ↗
21. Grojo · Appl. Phys. B · 2006 · 84 · 51710.1007/s00340-006-2283-1 ↗
22. Arnold · Proc. SPIE · 2002 · 4426 · 34010.1117/12.456828 ↗
23. Bodansky · 2004
24. Lapp · 2000
25. Knoll · 1999
26. US Department of Energy Report, 10 CFR Part 385, 1999, p. 458. See also www.sc.doe.gov/SC-80/sc-83/docs/835.pdf.
27. Hinds · 1982
28. Roberts · Appl. Phys. A · 2004 · 79 · 106710.1007/s00339-004-2632-z ↗
29. Grojo · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2006 · 252 · 478610.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.125 ↗