journal article·2009-06

Influence of processing parameters on atmospheric pressure plasma etching of polyamide 6 films

Zhiqiang Gao, Shujing Peng, Jie Sun, Lan Yao, Yiping Qiu

Applied Surface Science· Volume 255· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

This study is designed to systematically investigate how various factors, such as treatment duration, output power, oxygen gas flux, jet to substrate distance, and moisture regain, influence atmospheric pressure plasma etching rate of polyamide 6 (PA 6) films. The etching rate increased as the output power, oxygen gas flux, and moisture regain increased. As the treatment time increased, the etching rate increased first and then decreased. When the substrate was too close or too far from the nozzle, the etching rate was almost not measurable. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) show an increased surface roughness after the plasma treatment. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) shows a decreased carbon content and an increased oxygen content after the plasma treatment. T-peel strength shows an improved bonding strength between the PA 6 films and an adhesive tape after the plasma treatment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Plasma Applications and Diagnostics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Höcker · Pure Appl. Chem. · 2002 · 74 · 42310.1351/pac200274030423 ↗
2. Li · Composites Part A · 1997 · 28 · 7310.1016/S1359-835X(96)00097-8 ↗
3. Liston · J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. · 1993 · 7 · 109110.1163/156856193X00600 ↗
4. Chan · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 1996 · 24 · 110.1016/0167-5729(96)80003-3 ↗
5. Qiu · J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 16 · 44910.1163/156856102760067217 ↗
6. Morent · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2008 · 266 · 308110.1016/j.nimb.2008.03.166 ↗
7. De Geyter · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2008 · 266 · 308610.1016/j.nimb.2008.03.167 ↗
8. Hegemann · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2003 · 208 · 28110.1016/S0168-583X(03)00644-X ↗
9. Jeong · Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 1998 · 7 · 28210.1088/0963-0252/7/3/005 ↗
10. Park · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2000 · 76 · 288
11. Rapp · J. Chem. Phys. · 1965 · 43 · 146410.1063/1.1696957 ↗
12. Hancock · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 1995 · 74–75 · 1010.1016/0257-8972(95)08343-X ↗
13. Hwang · J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. · 2003 · 17 · 84710.1163/156856103321645194 ↗
14. Riekerink · Langmuir · 1999 · 15 · 484710.1021/la990020i ↗
15. Weikart · J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. · 2000 · 38 · 302810.1002/1099-0518(20000901)38:17<3028::AID-POLA30>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
16. Powell · Langmuir · 2003 · 19 · 907110.1021/la0349368 ↗
17. Svorcik · Polym. Degrad. Stabil. · 2006 · 91 · 121910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.09.007 ↗
18. Zhu · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2008 · 202 · 196610.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.08.046 ↗
19. Zhu · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2007 · 201 · 745310.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.02.012 ↗
20. Kotal · Plasma Process. Polym. · 2007 · 4 · 6910.1002/ppap.200600069 ↗
21. Navaneetha Pandiyaraj · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2008 · 202 · 421810.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.03.015 ↗
22. Muller · J. Appl. Phys. · 1964 · 35 · 155010.1063/1.1713665 ↗
23. Asad · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2009 · 203 · 179010.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.12.026 ↗
24. Rakowski · J. Soc. Dyers Colour · 1997 · 113 · 25010.1111/j.1478-4408.1997.tb01909.x ↗
25. Kim · Polymer · 2003 · 44 · 628710.1016/S0032-3861(03)00674-8 ↗
26. Svorcik · Polym. Degrad. Stabil. · 2007 · 92 · 164510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.06.013 ↗
27. Kohan · 1995
28. Saijo · Polymer · 1994 · 35 · 49610.1016/0032-3861(94)90502-9 ↗
29. Dobb · J. Mater. Sci. · 1992 · 27 · 387610.1007/BF00545470 ↗
30. Dobb · Polymer · 1979 · 20 · 128410.1016/0032-3861(79)90157-5 ↗