Laser annealing of amorphous carbon films
Source abstract
Abstract
Amorphous (a-C) Carbon thin films were deposited, using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) with a Nd:YAG laser ( 1064 nm, 7 ns), from a pyrolytic graphite target, on < 1 0 0 > silicon and refractory metal (Mo) substrates to a film thickness of 55, 400 and 500 nm. Samples were grown at RT and then annealed by a laser annealing technique, to reduce residual stress and induce a locally confined "graphitization'' process. The films were exposed to irradiation, in vacuum, by a Nd: YAG pulsed laser, operating at different wavelengths ( VIS, N-UV) and increasing values of energy from 6-100 mJ/pulse. The thinner films were completely destroyed by N-UV laser treatment also at lower energies, owing to the almost direct propagation of heat to the Si substrate with melting and ruinous blistering effects. For thicker films the Raman micro-analysis evidenced the influence of laser treatments on the sp(3)/sp(2) content evolution, and established the formation of aromatic nano-structures of average dimension 4.1 divided by 4.7 nm ( derived from the I-D/I-G peak ratio), at fluence values round 50 mJ/cm(2) for N-UV and 165 mJ/cm(2) for VIS laser irradiation. Higher fluences were not suitable for a-Carbon "graphitization'', since a strong ablation process was the prominent effect of irradiation. Grazing incidence XRD (GI-XRD) used to evaluate the dimension and texturing of nano-particles confirmed the findings of Raman analysis. The effects of irradiation on surface morphology were studied by SEM analysis.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Laser Material Processing Techniques · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1979 · 34 · 86410.1063/1.90703 ↗
2. Wood · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 23 · 292310.1103/PhysRevB.23.2923 ↗
3. Siegal · Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. · 1995 · 25 · 22310.1146/annurev.ms.25.080195.001255 ↗
4. Bonse · Appl. Phys. A · 2002 · 74 · 1910.1007/s003390100893 ↗
5. Bonse · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2004 · 221 · 21510.1016/S0169-4332(03)00881-X ↗
6. Bonse · J. App. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 01353810.1063/1.1827919 ↗
7. Chimmalgi · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 192410.1021/nl051244q ↗
8. Kononenko · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2005 · 14 · 136810.1016/j.diamond.2005.02.009 ↗
9. Miyajia · App. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 19190210.1063/1.2374858 ↗
10. Miyajima · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 15210410.1063/1.2908208 ↗
11. Cappelli · Diamond Relat. Mater · 2008 · 17 · 147610.1016/j.diamond.2008.03.005 ↗
12. Lamberton · Thin Solid Films · 1998 · 333 · 11410.1016/S0040-6090(98)00848-7 ↗
13. Zhang · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2004 · 22 · 223910.1116/1.1789214 ↗
14. Tauc · Phys. Status Solidi · 1966 · 15 · 52710.1002/pssb.19660150224 ↗
15. Bullen · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 88 · 631710.1063/1.1314301 ↗
16. Morath · J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 76 · 263610.1063/1.357560 ↗
17. Tuinstra · J. Chem. Phys. · 1970 · 53 · 112610.1063/1.1674108 ↗
18. Kononenko · Appl. Phys. A · 2004 · 79 · 54310.1007/s00339-003-2356-5 ↗
19. Sundaram · Nat. Mater. · 2002 · 1 · 21710.1038/nmat767 ↗
20. Le Harzic · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 388610.1063/1.1481195 ↗
21. Nistor · Appl. Phys. A · 1994 · 58 · 13710.1007/BF00332170 ↗
22. Kautek · Appl. Phys. A · 2005 · 81 · 6510.1007/s00339-005-3211-7 ↗
23. Guosheng · Phys. Rev. B · 1982 · 26 · 536610.1103/PhysRevB.26.5366 ↗
24. Serrano · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 760610.1063/1.1519337 ↗
25. McDonald · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 15312110.1063/1.2193777 ↗
26. Nakamiya · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2001 · 10 · 90510.1016/S0925-9635(00)00536-7 ↗